Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

Assess the degree of freedom in Plato's republic.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Assess the degree of freedom in Plato's republic In Plato's republic someone living in that kind of society today would view it very differently from someone from Plato's era. This means that we have to put everything in context. The other societies that Plato talked about were rubbished due to too much power given to one individual, and the leader giving in to the popular demand of the people even though it may not necessarily be the best thing for them. Plato's society of the Republic gave more freedom than some of the other society's discussed yet no where near as much freedom as we have today in our society. In Plato's democracy children would have a communal education, and then they would be assessed as they grew up then divided into he classes of gold, bronze, and silver.

Middle

By being confined to a particular class freedom is also taken away from the individual to mix within the whole society. The freedom from harm principle can be applied to Plato's democracy as everyone is assigned to a particular class this allows people the freedom to excel in the class that has been chosen for them. However there is clearly freedom that has been taken away for instance to mix between each of the given classes, this separation may cause the under classes to aspire to something they can't reach, giving them no incentive but to just do as they are told. Keeping individuals to these specific classes, allows Plato to act paternally on behalf of the citizens. It allows him to say 'I know what's best for you'.

Conclusion

would do good to them it could appear that the best way for him to gain the peoples trust is to let them make their own mistakes. If I were to tell you a certain food tasted horrible you would be more likely to try it yourself than just take my word for it; you get the chance to put your own mind at rest. In conclusion Plato's way of governing would be effective if everyone conformed yet it would limit the peoples freedom when the philosopher could in practice do as he pleased yet the people are limited greatly. However it can be argued that if the freedom is abstained from the individual then society will benefit as a whole. This could be true because the less freedom someone has the less likely they are to corrupt the system.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related GCSE Sociology

  1. Plato's "The Republic" ...

    Without light, even if eyes have the power of sight, the user will see nothing. In the same way when the minds eye perceives objects, which are illuminated by truth and reality, it can understand and know them, but when all it sees is the world of change and decay it will only be able to form opinions.

  2. Why did Plato think women could be legitimate political guardians?

    Plato believed that everyone should be used to make a community work and women as well as men should be used to this effect, as a benefit to the community rather then just as an individual going after individual

  1. Plato and the Republic.

    Thus the reason this is not the ideal society. A defective timocratic society is one where the courageous soldiers that founded the state have decided they should be the decision making body and have taken that privilege, which should belong to the more able and educated rulers, for themselves.

  2. Politics of Plato and Aristotle

    They are supposed to be the select few who know what is best for society (Hacker 33). Aristotle disagrees with the idea of one class holding discontinuing political power (Hacker 85). The failure to allow circulation between classes excludes those men who may be ambitious, and wise, but are not

  1. Sociology synopsis - To what degree is torture considered cruel and unnatural?

    Common sense would tell a person that after a body has been removed all its flesh, then have its hands in which the crimes were committed burnt and cut off... have the body quartered to then burn after; absolutely does constitute torture and its absolutely a different kind of torture that goes on today.

  2. The Cost of Freedom? Priceless.

    finally bring us all together, or finally tears us apart" (Daniel, 14). The controversy surrounding reparations is whether or not the government owns African-Americans who live in society today "something" for the oppression their culture has endured throughout this country's history.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.