• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the degree of freedom in Plato's republic.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the degree of freedom in Plato's republic In Plato's republic someone living in that kind of society today would view it very differently from someone from Plato's era. This means that we have to put everything in context. The other societies that Plato talked about were rubbished due to too much power given to one individual, and the leader giving in to the popular demand of the people even though it may not necessarily be the best thing for them. Plato's society of the Republic gave more freedom than some of the other society's discussed yet no where near as much freedom as we have today in our society. In Plato's democracy children would have a communal education, and then they would be assessed as they grew up then divided into he classes of gold, bronze, and silver. ...read more.


By being confined to a particular class freedom is also taken away from the individual to mix within the whole society. The freedom from harm principle can be applied to Plato's democracy as everyone is assigned to a particular class this allows people the freedom to excel in the class that has been chosen for them. However there is clearly freedom that has been taken away for instance to mix between each of the given classes, this separation may cause the under classes to aspire to something they can't reach, giving them no incentive but to just do as they are told. Keeping individuals to these specific classes, allows Plato to act paternally on behalf of the citizens. It allows him to say 'I know what's best for you'. ...read more.


would do good to them it could appear that the best way for him to gain the peoples trust is to let them make their own mistakes. If I were to tell you a certain food tasted horrible you would be more likely to try it yourself than just take my word for it; you get the chance to put your own mind at rest. In conclusion Plato's way of governing would be effective if everyone conformed yet it would limit the peoples freedom when the philosopher could in practice do as he pleased yet the people are limited greatly. However it can be argued that if the freedom is abstained from the individual then society will benefit as a whole. This could be true because the less freedom someone has the less likely they are to corrupt the system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Sociology synopsis - To what degree is torture considered cruel and unnatural?

    But in short this power is exercised rather than possessed. He says that punishment should not be a form of power over the criminal, which would mean that the criminal in a position of victimisation. But instead use the technology of power to understand why he commits the crime.

  2. Why did Plato think women could be legitimate political guardians?

    Like the philosopher king they should also be able to "see the good" [2] a thing which was a very important value to Plato and his republic because without it they would not be able to know what was best for the state and its citizens.

  1. Plato's "The Republic" ...

    Without light, even if eyes have the power of sight, the user will see nothing. In the same way when the minds eye perceives objects, which are illuminated by truth and reality, it can understand and know them, but when all it sees is the world of change and decay it will only be able to form opinions.

  2. Politics of Plato and Aristotle

    They are supposed to be the select few who know what is best for society (Hacker 33). Aristotle disagrees with the idea of one class holding discontinuing political power (Hacker 85). The failure to allow circulation between classes excludes those men who may be ambitious, and wise, but are not

  1. Plato and the Republic.

    Thus the reason this is not the ideal society. A defective timocratic society is one where the courageous soldiers that founded the state have decided they should be the decision making body and have taken that privilege, which should belong to the more able and educated rulers, for themselves.

  2. The Cost of Freedom? Priceless.

    Reparations for slavery can be made available to Blacks if they can agree that it will benefit their culture. The main debate over reparations is whether or not Blacks should allow white America to place a value on slavery, a historic legacy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work