• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that religion is a conservative force within society (40).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that religion is a conservative force within society (40). A number of sociologists argue that religion is a conservative force in society, that is, it produces stability not change within society and it reinforces the shared needs and values of society. For some sociologists this is a positive effect - the view of consensus theorists, for others it is a negative one - the view endorsed by conflict theorists. Durkheim is a consensus theorist, sometimes referred to as the father of functionalism, he supports the view that religion is a conservative force in society, reinforcing the existing society of society. He argued that religion should not be explained in terms of human ignorance, but as a result of shared social needs. He adopted a broad definition of religion throughout his analysis and defined it as a unified belief system of beliefs about the nature of sacred things. For Durkheim, shared religious belief systems were central to societal consensus as they set rules for social interaction and offered social solidarity and value consensus. In his book, "Elementary Forms of Religious Life", he examined the sources of order and stability in society and highlighted the part that religion played in sustaining this order. ...read more.

Middle

Religion emphasised the existence of an afterlife of eternal bliss - thus giving the oppressed something to look forward to - they felt that their treatment and the injustice against them would not matter when they died and went to heaven, and therefore they did not feel it necessary to rebel or disrupt the existing system as it was not encouraged by religion. Religion made a virtue out of the suffering produced by oppression, a virtue which made their present situation of poverty more tolerable as they knew they would be rewarded in the afterlife. Religion made the present more acceptable as it gave hope of supernatural intervention in the future when the problems on earth would be sorted out by God - the oppressed waited for this to happen instead of rebelling and overturning the system current at that time. The existing social order and hierarchy was justified as religion explained that it was decided by God. The oppressed accepted this philosophically as they believed there was nothing that they could do about it. Religion made the proletariats unsatisfactory lives bearable a it gave them hope in the future (in the form of an afterlife) ...read more.

Conclusion

on society as it helped capitalism to start off. Neo-Marxists dispute Carl Marx's original position and agree with Weber in saying that religion can produce social change. It is believed that Engels was the first to recognize that religion may be a vehicle of social change. This is demonstrated through looking back in time when early Christian sects resisted Roman rule - this shows that religion could be a source of resistance. A more recent account of the potential revolutionary force of religion is demonstrated in the following claim of the neo-Marxist Otto Manduro; Religion is not necessarily a functional, reproductive or conservative factor in society. It is often one of the main and sometimes the only available channel to bring about a social revolution. This claim is demonstrated by looking at; the Nationalist and Loyalist Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland, and the 1979 revolution in Iran when the Iranian royal family was deposed and Iran was turned into a strict Islamic fundamentalist state. It can be said that religion is a key agent of socialisation, that is, although it may cause a certain amount of change its primary effect on society is one of stability and cohesion. There are more cases of religion being a conservative force in society than there are of it being a radical one. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

The writer provides a good introduction, explaining consensus and conflict theories which are essential to understand in order to answer the question. It is correctly structured because it provides the Functionalist Durkheim’s views that religion is indeed a conservative force ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The writer provides a good introduction, explaining consensus and conflict theories which are essential to understand in order to answer the question. It is correctly structured because it provides the Functionalist Durkheim’s views that religion is indeed a conservative force (which the question asks for) and then continues to discuss theories of Marxism, Feminism, Calvinism and Neo-Marxism - so it addresses religion as a radical force also, therefore gaining lots of evaluative marks. This essay is well concluded, “There are more cases of religion being a conservative force in society than there are of it being a radical one” because the writer provides a final assessment of the question, coming to answer after considering both sides throughout. Overall this is already very impressive at GCSE level!

Level of analysis

Key terms are used correctly, “the elect”, “socialisation”, “revolutionary force” and are explained correctly, “...and the profane (not religious/secular)” which demonstrates sociological understanding. As this is essentially a purely theoretical question, the candidate does well to mention as many theories and theorists as possible, such as Durkheim’s “analysis of aboriginal society”. Usually Calvinism, Marxism and Neo-Marxism are poorly understood at GCSE so this essay is rather superior to lots I have seen – this candidate clearly knows them all inside out as they write a wealth of information about each one.
Different areas of the globe are discussed; “North of Europe” “Northern Island”, “Iran” which is refreshing because it shows that religion may be a conservative force in some countries but not others. Candidates tend to completely focus on the UK in Sociology, which decreases the amount of marks to potentially be awarded as sociology is the study of all different societies around the world.

Quality of writing

The writer has spelled the names of some key theorists wrong; it should be “Karl Marx” not “Carl Marx”, and “Otto Maduro” not “Otto Manduro”. Nonetheless these few mistakes would not lessen the overall high marks this essay would be sure to receive – it is very impressive at GCSE level and, to be honest, is just as good as lots of A Level essays I have seen. The quality of writing is quite good because the candidate uses a variety of punctuation, for example quotation marks and brackets, and also doesn’t make any major grammatical errors.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cwhite 14/09/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Marriage is no longer important. Evaluate the arguments for and against

    4 star(s)

    would get a sum of their money and their belongings, so lose everything, as they have the legal rights. Marriage is also important, because of the financial support and also emotional support it offers For example if in a family, the wife might not work, maybe, because they are unable to get a job and her husband might work.

  2. The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory

    The reality appears to be that nothing with such a narrow approach can promise anything with certainty. Similarly, the classical approach could not overcome the years of common law precedent built up in England at the time. It was inevitably impossible that England would be willing or even able to

  1. Functionalism and The New Right.

    Engles: > Explains how the evolution of the family is closely linked to private property. Zaretsky: > The family offers consolation in a brutal society, but is also oppressive. Cooper: > The family is oppressive to our creativity. Therefore an exploitive family produces an exploitive society.

  2. sociology research hypothesis - Attitudes towards Arranged and Love marriages In ...

    Social aspects "As of 2003, arranged marriage is still the most common form of marriage in several countries in South Asia, in particular Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. It crosses boundaries of religion, culture and caste, practiced by Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Jew and Muslims alike.

  1. Compare and contrast white collar crimes and street crimes, while understanding the definition of ...

    This, of course, requires money, something corporations have no trouble spending. They have no right to come and stop a story from airing because it might hurt their profit margin, yet it happens regularly. Obviously, large news organizations need to have a corporate division to handle business affairs, but business should not be allowed to effect good journalism.

  2. Is money the root of all evil

    Soon enough, crime becomes a factor and humans lose their morality and start stealing from one another. When I was in grade 10, my parents bought me a brand new IPod; nevertheless, it was stolen because someone wanted it as well.

  1. Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

    society became divided into two opposing camps: the bourgeois and the proletariat. Bourgeois ideology was false and most pertinently once the working class discovered that it was alienated it could embrace a model of liberation. Essentially the working class possessed an ambiguous identity; 'Class in itself' and 'class for itself'.

  2. How the film "Outsourced" shows the effects of culture shock on an American in ...

    Although Todd wants to stay at reserved hotel, Puro insists Todd living in his aunt own house. For Puro?s belief that Todd will fell comfortable and warming by receiving the care of aunti Ji. Therefore Todd is put into irritating manner.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work