• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that sociological arguments and evidence support functionalist views of the role and functions of religion in

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that sociological arguments and evidence support functionalist views of the role and functions of religion in contemporary society. Functionalists see society as based upon consensus, where each institution functions to help society work together as a whole with shared ways of thinking and behaving. So for functionalists such as Durkheim and Parsons religion is a way of integration and social control. They believe that the shared rituals and collective worship of religion help reinforce the consensual values and norms of society, and that without these shared values society could not function. Secondly it is thought to be a form of social control, providing divine backing and answers for society's rules, so people will abide by them. Functionalists such as Malinowski also believe that it is a way of coming to terms with life challenging events like death, marriage etc. For example the religious ceremonies enable individuals to cope with the life crisis by controlling their stress and anxiety whilst getting support ensuring they remain part of society. There is also the concept of civil religion, Durkheim argues that religion is in actual fact the worship of society and not a supernatural god. ...read more.

Middle

This expression of social solidarity reintegrates society. A second theory Malinowski puts forward is that religion is also a way of dealing with uncertainty and unpredictability, for example he noticed while studying the Trobriands that when the fishing was dangerous and uncertain rituals often preceded to ensure a good catch and the fishermen's safety. He therefore concluded that in situations which produce anxiety, religious rituals reduce the uncertainty by providing confidence and a sense of control. As for Parsons, he agrees with both Durkheim and Malinowski on some of their ideas, such as, Parsons believes that religion helps provide guidelines for human action. One example of this would be Christian belief in the Ten Commandments, these rules are seen as sacred and Christians aim to lead their lives according to these rules. It is essentially a form of instilling shared values and norms to society necessary according to Durkheim for the collective conscience. Also like Malinowski, Parsons sees Religion as a way of dealing with uncertainties and crises in life, he agrees that certain events can disrupt the normal order of things and that religion is a way of maintaining social stability by releasing the tension and stress they can cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unlike the functionalists who see the social control as helping to promote consensus, Marxists believe that religion promotes inequality and that it acts like a drug by helping to create the false conscience. It is seen as giving the subordinate group a false sense of reality and illusions of happiness so that they would question their role in society and accept their exploitation. Finally Feminists see religion as a patriarchal ideology, where beliefs support and legitimize gender inequality, this is because of such religions where females have to cover up from head to toe and be limited in what they do. Or for example in this country where women are not allowed to be priests. For Feminists religion is a way of oppressing women, not a way of promoting consensus. To conclude there are several arguments and evidence both for and against the Functionalist view of religion, the evidence can be manipulated either way. Depending on which theory is followed the way religion is viewed will be dominated by that ideology. For functionalists all evidence supports their view but Marxists can take the same evidence and turn it around to show the exact opposite. Some things however such as the religious wars cannot be ignored and cannot be manipulated to prove anything other than religion can be involved in conflict. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    is the idea that religion can be a major source of change through the intervention of significant ideas. He suggested that other societies do not have the values necessary for the development of capitalism. He argued that Judaism and Christianity had the key teachings and values, which encouraged capitalism, especially

  2. "Marxism and other theories of social conflict are irrelevant to an understanding of modern ...

    Functionalists like Durkheim believe in the "Structural consensus theory" as this explains social life through the learning and acceptance of shared norms and values. This belief of consensus, not conflict is a clear sign of the irrelevance of conflict theories.

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    Civil Religion Civil religion refers to a set of beliefs and practices related to the past, present and future of a nation, which is essentially 'sacred'. Civil Religion aims to reinforce value consensus though key figures or aspects of a country whose importance is understood by all.

  2. The position of widows in Nepalese society - sociological study.

    Migration is another consequence of widowhood. Many widows in rural area, unable to cultivate land or manage the cash crop without male assistance - and often in debt after nursing a sick husband - are forced to migrate to the town in search of cash.

  1. Defining religion.

    - distorting reality - creating 'class consciousness' therefore justifying different standards - diverting attention away from the real cause of suffering - helping the rich to accept/justify their own privileged position Defining Religion Functionalism o Durkheim defined religion fairly broadly - applying 'inclusivist' definition accepting as 'religious' anything which is

  2. "As researchers are also members of society it is impossible for them to be ...

    Howard Becker, an anti-positivist, thinks that this should be the case. He argues that it is impossible to conduct research 'uncontaminated by personal and political sympathies'. Becker argues that not only the research process but also the theories which lies behind it (in his case interactionism)

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    This relates to the extent immigrants felt comparable to the 'white' working class, and to what degree they participated in working class organisations, such as working class culture, the community and politics. (Rex, 1979, page 275) Rex and Tomlinson support the 'dual market labour theory' which states that there are two separate labour markets operating in the within Britain.

  2. "Assess the different sociological accounts of the role and functions of Religious institutions in ...

    Even if Durkheim was correct when he published his thesis, is the same level of totemism around in religion today? Robert Bellah would argue that this has been replaced with another type of religion, the civil or social religion. Bellah specifically looked at religious worship in the USA.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work