• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that the Nuclear Family can have a negative effect on the individuals within the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the view that the Nuclear Family can have a negative effect on the individuals within the family Many researchers in respected fields (such as psychology, anthropology, and of course sociology) have expressed concern that the (nuclear) family can indeed have a dark side. A major issue for concern and a significant possible cause of negativity in the family has been attributed to the increased isolation or 'private institutionalisation' of the over-idealised nuclear family; it's become very much introvert and separate from the outer world. This in itself is often a cause of individual deterioration as claimed by radical psychologists who believe the nuclear family can result in the upbringing of 'mentally damaged' children. R.D. Laing has introduced the idea of the Family as Gangsters and Ghetto. In the former, the family becomes a miniature internalised under ground community away from the upper world; family members may wage their own personal wars and may ally to others in defiance of leadership. ...read more.

Middle

For instance, sitting motionless and only eating when actually fed, and development of a mental condition which has her barred into a dream world which consists of a game of tennis. This is believed to be symbolic of the troublesome interactions in the family and therefore, caused by them. E. Leach, an anthropologist, believe that the modern nuclear family as being a malady and source of extensive problems that we're not present in the pre-industrial family. He claims that the modern family fails to provide adequate emotional support while provoking internal as well as external conflict by promoting introversion and localising stress which eventually gets out of control. External conflict is heightened by the nuclear family creating barriers to the world; a privacy which can lead to violence. Violence in the family is a controversial subject today and linked to individual relationship deterioration within the family environment. ...read more.

Conclusion

The fact that the nuclear family is seen as privatised and isolated is a reflection of continual alienation that the family suffers in the hands of fascist society. Marxists say personal fulfilment is attained not by privacy and limitation to the family, but by breaking down the walls to public life through proper socialisation. In conclusion, it does seem that the family is given too much time by itself. There is no doubt that this seclusion, in close proximity with other family members amidst stressful modern day life, can result in violence and psychological destruction over extended periods of conflict. However, the family (in this situation) has the ability to value their closeness and develop an environment of mutual trust and support which can benefit individuals. Ultimately it will depend on the attitudes and interactions within the family, personally I would prefer a society where the family has less power to limit the growth of its members and emphasis in life is placed on outside socialisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does the nuclear family benefit the bourgoisie?

    3 star(s)

    The capitalist system is based upon the domestic labour of housewives who reproduce future generations of workers. He also believes that family has become a vital unit of consumption. The family consumes the products of capitalism and this allows the bourgeoisie to continue producing surplus value.

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    have had to complete research studies in the past, and so understand the need for valid results. This therefore, would make the participant would put their full time and attention into disclosing accurate answers. As, they would want someone to do the same or them if it was for their research study.

  1. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    The 'Establishment' and its Ethos A hundred years ago, leading figures within politics, the judiciary and other significant institutions such as business and the Civil Service, formed a community largely congregated in central London, which overlapped considerably with upper class society (Moran 1989 p177).

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    Stage 2 was the early industrial stage from 1750 to 1900. This was the period in which home and work became separate and as factories excluded women, they became dependent on the men's wage. The 3rd stage is the modern industrial stage from around 1900.

  1. Is the Nuclear Family Disappearing?

    'newly wed' couples without children will have a different family life from those with dependant children. Robert Chester (1985) argued that the changes had only been minor. He claimed that the evidence found by writers such as the Rapoports was misleading, and the basic features of family life had remained largely unchanged for the majority of the British population.

  2. The links between school bullying and mugging and there affects on individuals lives.Is it ...

    According to Farrington (1993), Adolescents who lack good friends have no support when exposed to an offender's aggressive behaviour. The term 'mugging' refers to a psychological fear and possible physical attack on a victim. When pupils are constantly being assessed and classified, it is on this basis that they are defined as able or less able.

  1. Examine the paradox that the family may be simultaneously a source of fulfilment and ...

    Here feminists argue that one of the 'main ways women have been subordinated is through the organization of society around a private world of domestic work and the public world seen as the province of men'. The idea of man being the provider indicates how men are more privileged in

  2. History of womens oppression in Afghanistan.

    This has been true in Afghanistan. The Shariah laws and the structured Taliban and Northern Alliance forces have killed and punished collective activists, most notably Meena the founder of RAWA. (3) Apart from creating an injustice frame RAWA could use the fact that their leader was killed as evidence that, as Gamson (1992: 235)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work