• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxism as Models for the Way Society Operates

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxism as Models for the Way Society Operates Sociologists approach the study of society in different ways. Two concepts of society are functionalism and Marxism. Functionalists believe that different parts of society work together to keep the society running whereas Marxists believe societies are unequal and unfair. Both concepts differ in their views of how society operates for instance a Marxist would claim that there are only 2 classes and it is very hard to progress up a class whereas a functionalist would disagree and claim the harder you work, the more you achieve and the better your social position. Functionalists believe society works like a human body for instance every part of society works to keep it going just like organs in a body and that the human body grows and develops as does society. ...read more.


A Marxist strongly disagrees with this view and sees society as having only two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marxism states that the bourgeoisie control the jobs and in this society someone who has talent to be successful could end up a failure because of their social situation. Functionalism states that society is a group of people who share values, this value consensus is what makes the system work. Values exist as part of society rather than individuals and society needs us to be socialised into the values in order to work. On the other hand the Marxists believe the dominant values are those of the bourgeoisie, their values include 'work hard' and 'accept your place in society' and that rich people have worked hard in order to earn their money. ...read more.


For example society's institutions adapt to changing circumstances e.g education last longer these days because generally you need to be more skilled in working life these days. Marxists believe change in society is caused by revolution and conflict, where the lower class rise up against the higher class and change society in some way. Whereas functionalists believe all societies are based around values, Marxists feel societies are based around conflict. To conclude, Marxism and functionalism view society in very different ways, both have been criticised for ignoring a individual's perspective and choices. Both concepts think that society shapes the individual rather than the individual shapes societies. Society has changed and become more complicated so that Marxism and functionalism do not apply as much today as before. Both perspectives provide useful views on society but are not always truthful to real life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    The existence of sport in society is created by the interaction of people to fit their needs and interests, which is more then the needs of the capitalist economy (Dunning 1999, Coakley, 2004). Over time the organisation will reflect how the society is, yet sport can still be used as a way of protest and change.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    were under no obligation to look after the poor, people did not enjoy their wealth by spending it, instead reinvesting it to make more money. However, Weber also has the idea of "The Legitimisation Debate" where religion can be a source of change through the intervention of significant individuals.

  1. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    [Haralambos & Holborn 6th ed.] Although extremely critical of capitalism, Marx saw it as an essential and inevitable stepping stone towards communism by developing the technology to free people from material need and providing enough goods to feed and clothe the population.

  2. Main features of Functionalism.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ INTERPRETIVISM. The school created by Weber. They are the least scientific of all sociologists. SOCIAL ACTION THEORY. Action is to be distinguished from behavior in that it involves meaning or intention. Action theory is then, analysis of action starting with the individual actor.

  1. Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport.

    The Marxist's perspective is dominantly based on economic factors and over emphasises them; money is assumed to be everything within society and social life. This in turn leads to assumptions that those owning the productive and therefore economic resources are given the power and use it to control those without to maintain their hegemony.

  2. Gender-issues - which way forward

    The society is in real danger of falling apart, for the simple reason that no-one is taking responsibility: women have few legal responsibilities for their own actions - and are often prevented from taking responsibility even if they wish to do so - whilst vast numbers of men are too

  1. Society in which it operates.

    Examples of social responsiveness are evident as the Shepparton Preserving Company (SPC) contributes to charity with its "Share a can" day, where volunteers from among employees, growers and suppliers donate a day's work and materials to produce roughly $750,000 worth of food for the Victorian Relief Agency and Victorian Foodbank.

  2. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    Within the core sector there is evidence of significant adverse race and gender main effects on the earnings even after controlling human capital and occupational variables, while there is no significant evidence of this in the peripheral sector. The process of earning determination differs between sectors even when the analysis is restricted to full-time employed white males.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work