• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxism as Models for the Way Society Operates

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxism as Models for the Way Society Operates Sociologists approach the study of society in different ways. Two concepts of society are functionalism and Marxism. Functionalists believe that different parts of society work together to keep the society running whereas Marxists believe societies are unequal and unfair. Both concepts differ in their views of how society operates for instance a Marxist would claim that there are only 2 classes and it is very hard to progress up a class whereas a functionalist would disagree and claim the harder you work, the more you achieve and the better your social position. Functionalists believe society works like a human body for instance every part of society works to keep it going just like organs in a body and that the human body grows and develops as does society. ...read more.

Middle

A Marxist strongly disagrees with this view and sees society as having only two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marxism states that the bourgeoisie control the jobs and in this society someone who has talent to be successful could end up a failure because of their social situation. Functionalism states that society is a group of people who share values, this value consensus is what makes the system work. Values exist as part of society rather than individuals and society needs us to be socialised into the values in order to work. On the other hand the Marxists believe the dominant values are those of the bourgeoisie, their values include 'work hard' and 'accept your place in society' and that rich people have worked hard in order to earn their money. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example society's institutions adapt to changing circumstances e.g education last longer these days because generally you need to be more skilled in working life these days. Marxists believe change in society is caused by revolution and conflict, where the lower class rise up against the higher class and change society in some way. Whereas functionalists believe all societies are based around values, Marxists feel societies are based around conflict. To conclude, Marxism and functionalism view society in very different ways, both have been criticised for ignoring a individual's perspective and choices. Both concepts think that society shapes the individual rather than the individual shapes societies. Society has changed and become more complicated so that Marxism and functionalism do not apply as much today as before. Both perspectives provide useful views on society but are not always truthful to real life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    The existence of sport in society is created by the interaction of people to fit their needs and interests, which is more then the needs of the capitalist economy (Dunning 1999, Coakley, 2004). Over time the organisation will reflect how the society is, yet sport can still be used as a way of protest and change.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    However, there are a large number of differences between the two theories. For example functionalists explain everything in terms of the function it performs in society, particularly the way in which it keeps the social system as a whole in good order.

  1. Main features of Functionalism.

    Social change is adaptive and evolutionary, even rapid social change has the tendency to leave the basic institutional framework intact. v) Social integration is achieved essentially through 'value consensus' i.e. a pervasive set of principles which legitimize the existing political, social and economic structure.

  2. Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport.

    Motivating the members of the society to perform even less important or menial occupations in order to maintain society is vital and this can be achieved by rewarding. Within these two sociological perspectives it is fairly obvious that problems occur.

  1. Society in which it operates.

    Examples of social responsiveness are evident as the Shepparton Preserving Company (SPC) contributes to charity with its "Share a can" day, where volunteers from among employees, growers and suppliers donate a day's work and materials to produce roughly $750,000 worth of food for the Victorian Relief Agency and Victorian Foodbank.

  2. Gender-issues - which way forward

    and 'jobs for the girls' - a new self-appointed 'God's Police', as Australian feminist Ann Summers admits - in an entirely unnecessary 'gender war'. The basic political situation we have on gender issues in most Western cultures at present is that women have rights, and men have blame.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work