• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power. Karl Marx was a materialist philosopher who believed that all ideas came out of life, and its conditions not from any divine being or force, like the idealist philosophers believed(Hands,2000.P:11) This led him to present an analysis of power. According to Marx there was an underlying structure that determined social reality, and that must be grasped if social reality was to be understood. In his view the underlying structure was an economic one and its foundation is: natural resources, means of production and means of distribution. This underlying structure is "tantamount to the 'sum total of the relations of production. Furthermore, everything else in society must be built upon that foundation. The 'superstructure' is a 'reflex or a 'sublimate' of that underlying structure."(Harman,1997.P:43) It is essentially an ideological reflection of the forces at work in the socio-economic foundation. For example, a political constitution is just a legalizing of the privileges of the social class that owns the economic foundation of society. The police are heavily armed hired toughs who administer the 'rights' of the ruling class. So called morality is the defence of these advantages. The same with most art, literature, poetry, religion and what passes for science. To elaborate on these points in greater detail one must explore Marx's teleological view of history. Marx argued that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles."(Marx. ...read more.

Middle

Power is dynamic, not static as in the Marxist sense. It flows rapidly from one position to the next and is too mobile to be grasped, or be reduced to an economic base. With this constant flow of power people's individual understanding of their own identity changes and because of this Foucault finds an identity based on class hard to accept. Before the Renaissance there was a relative homogeneity and unity of authorised discourses. In short, there were only a few people or institutions who were authorised to, or could, communicate in a public way.-the monarchy, the church, the universities and artists. In addition, most of what was written , spoken and painted to support the status quo that is the authority of the church and monarchy. For any person, or institution, that spoke against the authorised discourses of the day the consequences could be drastic. When 'the Enlightenment' removed the Divine King it set up, in his place, the 'empty space' of democracy; power is fluid because the site of power is empty and potentially anyone can fill 'the Emperor's clothes'. However this also gave power the opportunity to conceal itself. The reason why Mulder, from The 'X Files', can not locate the truth is because no-one can really be sure what it is. Because knowledge and information are shared across government agencies, and there is no one person who is the King who is in the centre and able to explain everything. ...read more.

Conclusion

Foucault laments that while technologies of power, used in prisons, are supposed to produce 'compliant' bodies and behaviour but in reality the opposite happens. Prisons, in fact, function as 'criminal factories.' Prisoners become convinced that they are all the things the system says they are: 'lazy' 'scum' 'useless' etc. So the prisoners are brought together where they can exchange ideas, experiences and contacts. To put it bluntly where they can learn to become effective and efficient criminals and this is re-enforced because the prison system treats them like criminals. Zimbardo's prison experiment with randomly assigned roles of prisoner or guard, illustrates the influence of roles on attitudes and behaviour. One can conclude by saying that Marx presented an economic analysis of power. Power was something that was owned by the dominant class, in society, who owned the means of production. It flowed from the top down and its function was to repress, but because power was static one group could be overthrown by another and thus it could be grasped by the working class when they became a 'class for themselves'. However Focault sees history differently. He emphasises the discontinuties of history. Moreover after the removal of the 'Divine Rule of Kings' there was a change in the idea of the seat of power. Where power no longer flows from the top down but is instead owned by no-one. It can not be seized because it is dynamic that is to say it circulates throughout culture constantly moving from one position to the next. Like Marx Foucault agreed that power is more effectively exercised by hidden coercion's but he felt power was not only repressive but also positive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. In Discipline & Punish, Michel Foucault analyzes the emergence of disciplinary practices, as they ...

    The first difference is the object of control is no longer focused on the mind, but is more concerned with the body. An example of this is the vast apparatus of the Modern Prison that maintains a cell for each inmate to be placed.

  2. Using the factual accounts of the sinking of the Titanic, compare and contrast how ...

    The Carpathia on the other hand is some sixty miles away when it hears the calls for help, and immediately starts racing towards the scene. The Captain is portrayed as efficient, and concerned in the way he prepares his ships to receive the casualties.

  1. What Civil Society Can Do to Develop Democracy

    David Hume David Hume, in his Treatise on Human Nature, argued that there was no unity between Reason and Morality, and that people set their goals on the basis of Morality, but use Reason in achieving them. His three fundamental rules of conduct - the stability of possessions, their transfer

  2. Consumerism is a concept that has been increasing throughout society.

    Early researchers into consumer behaviour have argued that gender related aspects of consumption are frequently often understated or neglected (Fischer, 1991). A short advert for a product leaves little time within which to impart essential information about a product and thus, the advertiser must rely on what already exists in the minds of the target audience.

  1. The Hidden Curriculum; Hegemony and Capitalism.

    The hidden curriculum through its use of streaming programs is a form of hegemony. Hegemony is a theory created by Antonio Gramsci which, "refers to a social consensus created by dominant groups who control socializing institutions such as the media, schools, churches, and the political system; these institutions prevent alternative

  2. Is 'Patriarchy' a useful concept anymore?

    However this existence contained occupational segregation, where the females worked only in female jobs and males concentrated in male jobs. 'Middleton (1979) argued that women did carry many different agricultural tasks, but it was the men who did the high status work of plouging.'

  1. Environmental Lessons From History.

    Lessons Perhaps Easter Island is not the example to look at when we study our own environmental mistakes of modern times. It might seem that all the countries of the world could not contrive a mismanagement of resources to such an extent.

  2. Why Does the Work of Karl Marx, as a Classical Sociologist in the Nineteenth ...

    Uneven economic development on a global scale was dissected, showing that the process of industrial restructuring was passing beyond the control of the notion-state, increasing economic insecurity for many. The social power accruing to owners of land and capital, the effects of class position on private consumption and the impact

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work