• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Marxist and Functionalist accounts of religion.

Extracts from this document...


Darren Marks Sociology Compare and Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Accounts of Religion Both functionalists and Marxists share the common view that religion serves to legitimise the morals and laws within society. Many functionalists as well as Marxists do agree that society creates religion as a visual symbol of itself. Followers are ultimately not worshipping their religion, their worshipping society and everything it stands for. However, this is where the split in views begins. Functionalists see Religion as serving towards the 4 pre-requisites of society. (Namely: Social integration, shared values, social solidarity, and social harmony). By ensuring these needs are met, religion reinforces collective values and promotes solidarity. Functionalism is not over concerned about the 'why' religion is allowed to assume this falsified symbolism, but instead recognises it's use in keeping harmony and faith in society. Durkheim demonstrates this in admitting that religion does not have to be 'super natural'. It's important to note that mortal people and objects can gain a sacred status in society similar to that of the idols of religion. ...read more.


He did, however, agree that religion promotes solidarity. It does so by dealing with emotional stress / life crisis (disruptive events). Religion goes as far as to introduce ceremonies for dealing with various life crisis. Death is given a funeral. Love is given marriage. In all cases then hope is given through the expressed belief in immortality and fellow mourners serve to comfort and support the bereaved, so they can become functional members of society once again. Dangerous and unpredictable events are also surrounded in religious ceremony. Prayer is common before a possibly hazardous experience. These rituals reduce anxiety and increase confidence, strengthening unity in shared situations. Talcott Parsons shares this view and goes onto show how religious devices, such as the 10 commandments, provide the basis for many social norms and morals. Religion guides behaviour and helps in the formulation of decision through this. Finally, Religion is looked to answer the "ultimate questions" and give meaning to our existence. Humanity needs to feel as though there is meaning in all significant things; meaning to death and suffering, and justification of existence in itself. ...read more.


The idea of equal opportunity is ultimately crushed by harsh teachings and acceptance that a lower class worker is having a bad life because super natural forces placed them in that situation as punishment for wrongfulness in previous life. In conclusion, Marxist and functionalist similarities on the subject start and end with the acceptance of religion as a conservative force in society. Neo Marxism does accept the idea (like functionalism) that religion can sometimes be useful to society in bringing about change for the better. For instance the radical role of Liberation Theology. (Madura). Traditional Marxism is totally opposed to the oppressive role of religion and would be surprised to see that radical forces have emerged with some minority religious groups. Functionalists such as Durkheim and Parsons see religion as being a positive and perhaps essential part of the harmonious workings of society but have been criticised for ignoring the dysfunctional, disruptive, and divisive aspects of religion. They fail to consider hostility between religious groups within the same society. "It would seem that religion threatens social integration as readily as it contributes to it" (Stark & Glock). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the Functionalist and Marxist views of society.

    5 star(s)

    with the ideology of the bourgeoisie maintaining the false consciousness of the proletariat. Whereas the functionalist approach might view religion as a positive influence on society, Marx dismissed it as the "opium to the people". Marx predicted that this state of affairs would be overthrown and that conflict would be removed and replaced by communism.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Malinowski supported Durkheim's views on religion's role in society in reinforcing social norms and values and promoting social solidarity, but he does not see religion as reflecting society as a whole nor that religion is worshiping society.

  1. Evaluate Marxist and Functionalist Views of Religion.

    The Marxists also believe that religion does not solve any problems, they believe religion is just a bad attempt to make life more bearable. Promises of afterlife and hopes of an intervention from a supernatural being to make peace on Earth are the issues the oppressed look for.

  2. Functionalist views on Religion.

    With churches becoming more integrated with society, some would feel that the church had lost its power and intensity. This leads to the formation of a fundamentalist sect, with more intense commitment. 2. As a response to a decline in 'Community' For Wilson, the growth of religious sects can be

  1. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    They see the education system as driven by the needs of capitalism which wants a work force that is easily exploited and accepts their exploitation. Both Marxists and functionalists see education as a powerful influence on students, making sure that they conform to societies norms and values.

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    This is known as meritocratic, getting on by merit alone. Then on to religion, Talcott Parsons states that religion gives values and norms a sacred quality so that they become powerful moral codes governing behaviour; people conform to religious teachings and beliefs during the socialisation process, the ten commandments, one being "thou shall not kill" being a good example.

  1. Outline and assess the differences and similarities between the Functionalist and Marxist views on ...

    The Functionalist perspective has since often been criticized for what has been perceived as its failure to take into account the 'dark side' of society, and the theme of social deviance and isolation - for example functionalist writers such as Parsons project the image of the 'cereal packet' family and

  2. Compare and contrast the Functionalist and Marxist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    He recognised the direct link between the value of religion and of society. His study of Australian aborigines and totemism suggested that since the totem is both and outward sign of their principle God, and an emblem of each clan, the people are, in effect, worshipping the society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work