• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast two of the perspectives Marx & Weber Karl Marx is a German socialist who had strong views and ideas about class and society, his theory was what is called a macro theory. This is basically meaning that it has general theories for the masses and sees people working together, for a common goal. Max Weber also a German socialist on the other hand, separates people into small groups and individuals and is very much a 'dog eat dog' view of people and society. Weber believed that people competed against each other for resources, prestige and power in society. Marx theory is what is called a 'homogeneity' view, which sees everyone as the same and all being equal. Weber's theory however is called a 'heterogeneous' view in which everyone is different and people are not equal, there is a very clear divide between the 'working class' and 'middle class' exclusionary practices are common place, and it could be said that it is restrictive and aims to keep the rich rich and the poor poor. Marx believed that people needed to work together in order to get the basics of life e.g. food and material objects, by working together they enter social relationships or groups which are defined by the combination of 'forces of production' and 'means of production' the forces of production is the physical labour involved of production and the 'means of production' is the machinery and tools that are also required in the production. ...read more.


However Marx believed it was purely down to who owned the means of production and who didn't. Weber saw capitalism as making people richer and more prosperous due to the expanse of capitalist enterprises and the increase in demand of administration workers there became more 'white collar' or middle class. Marx however saw the polarization of the workers, as large companies expanded taking over small businesses and companies, which brought more white collar workers and less and less owners but more and more workers. Weber unlike Marx didn't believe in 'collective class' and saw no reason as why working class would attempt to organise each other and try to other throw capitalism so they could be a collective class and share the wealth. He did acknowledge it as a possibility as the 'common market' formed by the expanse of the capitalist enterprises would make it easier for working class to form groups, but saw it as nothing more than a possibility. Unlike Marx who thought political power should lie with economic power e.g. as the vast majority of society was working class they formed the economic power and therefore should have the political power as well, Marx saw it as unfair and unjust that the minority of wealthy classes had the majority of political power. ...read more.


religions, people who went to public schools mixing only with other public school families and reserving jobs only for people who also attended public school, an extreme example of status being restrictive is the Caste system in India. To a degree this contradicts Weber's theory of 'rewards' being handed to the 'superior' as there are other factors involved. In conclusion Weber seems to break down the barriers of class making people less 'class conscious' and weakening class solidarity. Because he sees people grouping themselves by their status it makes it less important. Whilst doing this he is still continuing the progression of the capitalist way of life. He seeked to bring people together by their attitudes, beliefs and values. Marx believed that being a member of a certain community defined by your wealth is what determines people's values and beliefs, he strived for social equality believing that class is the only element that forms social groups but his views can be seen as na�ve and basic. Weber sees people as being in control of their 'destiny' and 'rewards' not confined to the class they were born into. He believes society has a much more complex and diverse social structure than Marx's and believes the rewards should only be handed out to people who prove themselves to be superior and not given to groups just because they are the majority. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social ...

    However these classes are not, for Weber, located in the production process as they are in Marx's work. Rather Weber's classes are rooted in economic markets. Markets such as the labour markets, the commodity markets and the money markets. Therefore classes are the product of market relationships.

  2. Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies.

    RSPCA, trade unions or religious groups). Leaders and members in such organizations have different social power within a society. Weber suggested that the relationship between political groups and class and status groups are not always clear-cut. 'Weber argues that men do not only strive for power to enrich themselves.

  1. I will examine the social class theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber, and ...

    Subsequently, class is not defined as one of Marxist rigidity, but one of Weber's more flexible and less clearly defined model. However, there is a problem with this perspective, in that although the celebrities have the income and lifestyle of the upper class, they do not fit in with the traditional Marxist view of the capitalist as the upper class.

  2. Feminist Perspectives On Education.

    There was an obvious tension between the demands of such an ideology and the realities of a capitalist economy, which utilised women as a cheap source of labour. Most working class women were forced at some time in their lives to engage in paid labour just to survive.


    we can see all these things and more are vital for a society to exist and function on a balanced level. Looking at the caste system in India and referring to the Harijans, they are so degraded in society that they don't even play an equal role in the workforce, education, or even their own lives and wellbeing.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    ''Power, as well as honor, may be guaranteed by the legal order, but... [the legal order] is not their primary source. The legal order is rather an additional factor that enhances the chance to hold power or honor; but it cannot always secure them'' (926-7).

  1. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    focus on the issue of fixed returns, the assumption by human capital theorists that economic returns to worker characteristics are uniform. In order to do this, they rely on sectoral economic differentiation models based on theories of economic dualism. These models divide the industrial structure into distinctive sectors within which

  2. Using examples describe a range of sociological perspectives and theories (including both classic and ...

    It celebrates all things female, whether these derive from social, class, or biological circumstances of women's lives. Difference feminists see many gender traits as biological, or at least deeply structured cultural, traits. They celebrate the differences between women and men, seeing feminine qualities as a source of personal strength and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work