Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7

Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social class.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social class Inequality between people is the basis of the democratic system. Those who have the skills and abilities to perform and produce will succeed. But this belief is with the assumption that all people are given equal advantages and opportunities. During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Max Weber were two of the most influential sociologists who developed their own theories about why inequality is maintained. This essay, using sociological explanations, compares the differences and similarities between Marx and Weber's theories of class. It examines their theories of class, which are based on economic inequality. Finally, this essay reveals that Weber emerges as the better theorist as he can explain more of the complexities of modern stratification thereby providing a better explanation for class in contemporary society. As Giddens (1997:240) writes "inequalities exist in all types of human society". Sociologists have given the term 'social stratification' to describe inequalities. "It is necessary to make a distinction between social inequality, which is the existence of socially created inequalities and social stratification, which is a particular form of social inequality" (Haralambos and Holborn, 1995:21). Social stratification includes all forms of inequalities such as gender, ethnicity, age and political power, not only that of class inequality. (Bilton, Bonnett, Jones, Skinner, Stanworth and Webster, 1996:138). "Some dimensions of stratification may include the amount of property one owns, the honour one receives, the ethnic group into which one is born or the income one receives" (Waters and Crook, 1993:174).

Middle

Weber, unlike Marx, explains other dimensions of stratification besides class. One based on 'life styles' (or status), that may be quite different from class systems (e.g. particular occupations might have traditional status regardless of their levels of income or wealth). Status groups for Weber, may have sources outside class: people who work in the same place feel that they have much in common, for example, even if they belong to different classes. (Haralambos and Holborn, 1995:37). What members of status groups have in common is a style of life. Stratification therefore occurs along lines of lifestyles. Finally, there are independent systems of political power too, where groups known generally as 'parties' (which might include pressure groups or informal lobbying outfits like consumer protest movements) struggle for power to influence legislation or to control and limit markets etc. (Haralambos and Holborn, 1995:38). Just as status groups can both divide classes and cut across boundaries, so parties can divide and cut across both classes and status groups. Weber's arguments about bureaucracy must be added to this picture. The development of modern bureaucracy makes the picture of class more complex again. Weber notes, however, that bureaucracy is often bound up with class structure: bureaucracy is fully developed only in modern times and especially in the 'advanced institutions of capitalism' (Gerth and Mills, 1947:196). Bureaucrats form a status group, and one, which cultivates and reinforces its position. Marx believed that certain factors, such as capitalism 'alienating' workers from their job, would hasten the downfall of capitalism and that these factors will result in the polarisation of the two main classes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this essay has shown that both theorists agree that ownership of property and the value of labour are key causes of class stratification. But Marx puts his emphasis on property ownership, while Weber focuses on labour value. The result is that Marx sees the role of a capitalist government as protecting the bourgeoisie property rights and Weber sees it as introducing bureaucracy to stand between the bourgeoisie and their exploitation of the workers. Weber, unlike Marx, takes a multi causal approach when explaining social phenomena. We can see this multi causal approach at work in Weber's treatment of class. For here Weber is arguing that non-economic factors such as 'family background', 'educational attainment' and 'culture/beliefs' are important causal factors in the determination of class. Weber refuses to tie 'status' or 'party' too closely or necessarily to class. Weber emerges as the better theorist, because he can explain more of the complexities of modern stratification, while Marx is seen to reduce everything down to one fundamental model based on his own analysis of capitalism as exploitation. Weber's theories on class and stratification show that other dimensions of stratification, besides class, strongly influence people's lives. Marx's attempt at a formal definition usefully indicates the social bases of class; this approach fails to take adequate account of all the other classes that exist in society. The Weberian perspective gives credence to the importance of ideas in social life and in my view provides a better explanation for class in contemporary society.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related GCSE Sociology

  1. Crime and Social class - Hypothesis - 'There is a relationship between social ...

    Not many working class people are able to reach this level of achievement. They are stuck in dead end jobs with no chance of promotion. Consequently, there is a greater pressure on them to become successful. Crime offers one way.

  2. Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

    He believes that the 'market value' of an individuals skills are the most important thing in which class someone belongs, and that high demand job's receive the benefits of high salaries and rewards.

  1. The essay will interpret inequalities in health among the sub-populations of socio-economic class position, ...

    (Moon and Gillespie, 1995: 200) The culture and behaviour approach however has a 'common sense' appeal and it fits very well with assumptions about human rationality and the capacity for self-control and lifestyle through individual choice. However it tends to ignore the social and cultural context in which individual behaviour is located.

  2. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    Their market situation will directly affect their chances of obtaining those things defined as sought-after in society such as higher education, good quality housing and health care. However, Weber went on to develop a multifaceted and more intricate view of society. Social stratification is not merely a matter of class.

  1. Using examples describe a range of sociological perspectives and theories (including both classic and ...

    Environmentalism argues for better, sustainable balance between people and the natural environment. They are less concerned with how society is structured or social interaction but more interested with informing sociologists about the impact they are having in the area in that society is based.

  2. Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies.

    'Weber saw no evidence to support the idea of the polarization. Although there were some declines in the numbers of the petty bourgeoisie (the small property owners) due to competition from large companies, he argued that they enter white-collar or skilled manual trades rather than being depressed into unskilled manual workers.'(Haralambos and Holborn, 2000)

  1. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    These four main perspectives are the Functionalist perspective, the New Right perspective, the Marxist perspective and the Weberian perspective. The work of Karl Marx and Max Weber were the most important in the development of stratification. Weber's work, however, because of its accuracy and its reason, was more important than Marx.

  2. The cannabis debate

    MONEY & RESOURCES The fact that it is illegal means that not just growers and merchants make a living from cannabis, but customs and police officers, gangsters, drug workers, seed merchants and grow-manual authors aswell. (Matthews, 2003) Research has revealed that Britain's 'cannabis economy' is worth £5 billion a year in sales alone.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.