• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically compare Functionalist and Marxist theories of religion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay: Critically compare Functionalist and Marxist theories of religion Religion beliefs of one sort or another are present in every known society but their variety seems to be endless and it is therefore difficult to produce a broad definition. Two main approaches that look at religion can be used though and these are the Marxist and Functionalist theories. All definitions emphasize certain aspects of religion and exclude others. Functional definitions tend to be too inclusive - it is too easy to qualify as a religion; while substantive ones tend to be too exclusive - it is too difficult to qualify as a religion. Marxism and functionalism are generally seen as fundamental opposites. They do have some similarities but there are generally very clear differences between the two approaches, which is why they must be looked at and compared in closer detail... Marxism provides an alternative theory of religion to Functionalist writers such as Comte and Durkheim. ...read more.

Middle

It was seen by Marx and other Marxists to be a dangerous and oppressive system that had to be abolished. The following quote shows Marx's position as just described: "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give-up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give-up a condition which needs illusions.". Marx is thus arguing two things - firstly, that religious ideologies provide people with a sense of well-being and contentment that is an illusion. Secondly, that the need for illusions about the world comes from the conditions under which people live meaning at times we create illusions but for certain reasons in our life that are not necessarily clear above the surface. However, Functionalist sociologists focus their attention on the nature of institutional relationships in society. This perspective concentrates on the various ways individual behaviour results from the nature of institutional relationships in society. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, in the above respect, whilst we might expect to see a decline in the importance of religion as an aspect of modern societies, religious beliefs, values and ideologies will persist because religion is such a flexible, adaptable framework for the explanation of "certain things in our everyday lives. In some ways though, it can be argued that both theories have weak areas. For example, they both similarly fail to consider secularization. The ideological power of religion is undermines by the fact that less than 10% of people attend church. Either way, the comparisons are clear through such sociologists work as Durkheim, Malinowski and Marx, and can easily be concluded despite some similarities like the example above. The functionalist perspective examines religion in terms of society's needs and that the function of religion is the contribution it makes to meeting such functional prerequisites. Yet, Marxism tells us that religion is an illusion which eases the pain produced by exploitation and oppression and is a distortion or reality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    Marx says the only way to stop this, is to overthrow the bourgeoisie by revolution to get a communist "classless" society. Both functionalist and Marxist views support the status quo, functionalist don't want change where as the Marxist feels the need to overthrow is the only way.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Parsons developed Durkheim's analysis of religion as a force of social cohesion and agreed that religion embodied the values and morals of society. Parsons firstly sees the role of religion in society as providing guidelines for people to live by; religion legitimises the core values of society.

  1. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    In particular the various institutions, beliefs and values found in the superstructure that reflect and reproduce the relationships of domination and subordination found in the infrastructure. Therefore, the ruling class, that is the owners of the means of production, will benefit from strong political support and laws ensuring their interests

  2. Evaluate Marxist and Functionalist Views of Religion.

    This meant that attempts to change the social order would have been not merely acts of treason but also a blasphemous rejection of Gods plan, punishable by eternal damnation. In modern capitalist societies such religious teachings have been abandoned. Marx's basic premise was that religion is a human phenomenon rather than a supernatural one.

  1. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    where the skills they need to obtain to become a member of society are gained, such as respect and following rules that are in place. Emile Durkheim suggested the idea of differentiation. He said that as societies develop and become more complex, they need to enhance the division of labour and provide specialist agencies for executing this function.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    Having collected evidence regarding 'race issues' from a previous study she had conducted in South Africa, which Paterson believed illustrated a 'race situation', she was able to make the distinction between a 'race situation' and an 'immigrant situation'. For Patterson, a 'race situation' is moulded solely upon the obvious 'colour' divisions between different groups.

  1. Defining religion.

    Catholics in Ireland against English govt. Gramsci o Social superstructure is more independent of the economic base than Marx claimed o Religion's not as tightly tied to the wished of the ruling class & maybe a vehicle for w/c liberation Otto Maduro o Accepts many aspects of Marx's analysis of

  2. Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxist Theories of the Role of Religion These Two ...

    The third point is that religion justifies social class. This means everyone was too scared to challenge this system as they thought it was punishable to eternal damnation. The last point is that religion encourages people to accept their position. Religion says that if your poor your more likely to be able to go to heaven than a rich

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work