• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically Examine the Subcultural Approach to Crime and Deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically Examine the Subcultural Approach to Crime and Deviance. Subcultural theories share the common belief that people who commit crime usually share different values from the mass of law-abiding members of society. However, crime committing people do not live in complete opposition to mainstream values; rather they have 'amended' certain values so that this justifies criminal behaviour. As a way of structuring this particular discussion of sub-cultural theories, it is useful to distinguish between two main types of sub-culture; Reactive and Independent. A "reactive sub-culture" is one in which the members of a particular sub-cultural group develop norms and values that are both a response to and opposition against the prevailing norms and values that exist in a predominantly middle-class or conventional culture. In this respect, this form of sub-culture is sometimes called "oppositional" rather than reactive. Durkheim claimed that a state of anomie was occurring in modern society, where norms and values within society were becoming confused thus people do not know what to expect from one another which leads to deviant behaviour. Robert Merton adopted Durkheim's basic Functionalist position in relation to law and crime and refined the concept of anomie as a means of attempting to understand the conformity and non-conformity to social rules at the level of individual / group behaviour. A study made in the context of reactive / oppositional sub-cultures is one in which a link to the work of Merton is made; In this respect, Merton altered the general focus of Durkheim's use of the concept of anomie, changing it from a condition whereby a state of true normlessness existed, to one in which individuals could experience anomie if they were unable to follow the dominant norms in any society. ...read more.

Middle

And The "social or collective": where they provide a means for both "coping" with and "getting back at" society (as represented by those in authority). 3. Although Cohen's work was carried-out in the 1950's in America, more recent studies have tended to demonstrate much the same sub-cultural forms of response amongst working class boys in Britain. However, the response to this is that the working classes, by definition, are the least successful members of any society. They are the class to whom conventional means to success have least meaning. In this respect, the experience of working class adults (the fact of their failure by following conventional means) leads them to socialise their children in ways that will give them the greatest possible advantage in their adult lives (the greatest possible chance of achieving desired ends) - and this means adopting illegitimate / deviant means. This form of sub-cultural response involves the presence of three main conditions: a. A stable, cohesive, working class community: In this respect, the potential criminal will be able to develop contacts within both the mainstream working class culture and the criminal sub-culture (for example, stolen goods can be easily distributed through a wider mainstream culture that doesn't ask too many questions...). b. Successful role models: In this sense, there needs to be people of standing in the community who have "done well" out of crime. The young criminal can begin to model themselves upon such people - they represent tangible evidence of the fact that crime does pay and that crime is a potential route out of poverty, deprivation, low social status and so forth. ...read more.

Conclusion

3. Smartness: The ability to "look good" (especially on a night out) is a significant component of self-identity - if you look good then you feel good. There are perhaps two further aspects to this meaning of smartness: a. It represents a way of impressing people (especially women). b. It can be used as an exaggerated form of mockery in relation to middle class cultural values. The "Teddy Boy" phenomenon in Britain in the late 1950's, for example, involved the adoption, by working class boys, of an exaggerated, deliberately distorted, code of dress that reflected middle class norms and, by so doing, mocked such norms. 4. Excitement: The idea of "having fun" is significant mainly because Miller argued that, through their working lives lower class males were effectively denied much sense of self-expression. Only through their leisure activities could life become pleasurable, hence the emphasis by lower class males on "having a good time". Whilst in conclusion all of these theories on subculture approaches towards crime and deviance provide some kinds of explanation, there are a number of reasons for not viewing them as particularly convincing: They tend to assumes that people share similar ends. They see the socialisation process as being the crucial variable in relation to conformity / deviance and the particular form that an individual's deviation takes. There is, for example, little or no sense of the deviant making a conscious choice. Or they assume that the social reality portrayed through Official Statistics on crime is a valid one in relation to criminals / non-criminals: It's by no-means a clear-cut distinction that can be made between, on the one hand, criminals and, on the other, non-criminals. ?? ?? ?? ?? Mr. Petty 1 Holly Dale A2 Sociology Crime and Deviance ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in understanding crime and deviance

    Cloward and Ohlin then distinguished three possible responses to this situation: the 'criminal subculture', the 'conflict subculture' and the 'retreatist subculture': Firstly is the criminal subculture. Criminal subcultures tend to emerge in areas where there is an established pattern of organized adult crime.

  2. A Study of Football Hooliganism: Are Football Hooligans "Real" Fans?

    they have no other violent tendencies. Lucy Procter from the Liverpool Hope University College interviewed football hooligans as part of her research in her dissertation. In it she said that they (the hooligans) 'emphasised the fact that they fight at football with other 'firms' who want to fight them (usually after the game)

  1. Inventing Reality: Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    However, it is obvious that Svidrigailov is indeed real as he had a strong influence on Dunya's life. As soon as we learn about his history and the conditions under which he married Marfa Petrovna, it becomes clear that Svidrigailov is also a person who rejects society and feels alienated.

  2. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". According to Becker, after the individual has been labelled as deviant, they progress down the path of a 'deviant career' and it becomes hard to shake off the deviant label as others see it as a master status of the individual.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    upon the interests of men (this claim arises first as the problem of unjust suffering and just compensation for the unequal distribution of individual happiness in the world).

  2. It is argued that subcultures define themselves in opposition to the dominant culture. ...

    for a period of years and is even willing to subsidise the phase. However, for some people this break from the dominant culture becomes the place of permanent settlement. This is when a group moves towards becoming a counter-culture. There are several different theories on why youth subcultures form.

  1. Media, leisure & fashion - Britain in the 1930's.

    They also affected public opinion and were thus an important tool for anyone who wanted to manipulate public opinion. Television sets, although available in the 1930s, were very expensive, and so instead, children were kept entertained through comics. Paper making had undergone a technological revolution, with the use of wood

  2. Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in understanding of crime and deviance.

    Unlike sociologists like Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin who suggest that crimes in a result of distinctive subcultures. Miller (1962) spoke of six focal concerns of the working class culture that can lead males into crime. Miller argues that crime is an extension of normal working call values not a set of alternative values.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work