• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the Formation and Social Impact of Religion and Belief Systems

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the Formation and Social Impact of Religion and Belief Systems Belief systems, religions and societies have been around since the beginning of recorded time. Based on their longevity alone, it is easy to postulate that their origins and functions must be mutual, or at the very least, have a history of interaction. Therefore, unsurprisingly we find belief systems present in all known societies, and consequently, beliefs systems and religion have a social impact. To assess this social impact one must first be able to define and distinguish them in order to qualify their impact. A belief system is a set of organised convictions, predicating a way of thinking that pertains to acceptance or accreditation of something. Religion is centred in religious beliefs and the stylised enactment of them. However, in attempting to define religious beliefs we must encompass all varieties of religious belief without incorporating phenomena that are not normally thought of as religions. To overcome this problem two approaches have been adopted relying on functional and substantive definitions. Functional definitions see religion and its beliefs in terms of what functions it performs for society or individuals. For example, Yinger defined religion as "a system of beliefs and practices by means of which a group of people struggles with the ultimate problems of human life" (quoted in Hamilton, 1995). However, as with many functional definitions, it is too inclusive regarding belief systems and often puts forward functional means that can be addressed by other aspects of human life. ...read more.


On the other hand, Malinowski may have taken a particular function or effect that religion sometimes could be attributed to have (dealing with uncertainty) and mistaken it for a feature of religion in general. Obviously, by its own nature, the functionalist perspective of belief systems and religion does not account for the dysfunctional aspects the disruptive force of religion can manifest. These divisive aspects of religion also have a social impact and must be considered. The Marxist perspective focuses on the force behind religion, addressing both the functional and dysfunctional effects it can have on society applying a more holistic view. When comparing present society to his perfect ideal society, Marx saw religion as the 'opium of the people' (Marx in Bottomore and Rubel, 1963). He suggested religion acts as an opiate to dull the pain produced by oppression in a number of ways: Promising a paradise of eternal bliss in life after death; Making a virtue of the suffering produced by oppression; Offering hope of supernatural intervention to solve dire problems; and to justify the social order and a person position within it. Therefore, from a Marxist viewpoint, religion does not simply cushion the effects of oppression, it also acts and an instrument of that oppression. In terms of religion's social impact, the Marxist perspective sees religion as a potent mechanism of social control. He saw religion impacting on society to produce a false class consciousness, diverting peoples attention from the real source of their oppression with false justification and encouragement, and so helping to maintain ruling-class power. ...read more.


This gives support to secularisation and also the formation of sects and denominations. In my opinion, we are all inescapable social Darwinists and religion and belief systems are inherent forces being both product and producer of society. Importantly many theories (e.g. Marxim & Feminism) imply religion and belief systems to be an instrument of manipulation, this actually tells us nothing of their true underlying formation and social impact. For instance, just because art or drama can be utilised for ideological purposes this does not explain the existence or function of art or drama. As we move forward into a global society, the future formation and continuation of religion and belief systems is becoming more personal, born out of many different cross pollinations of cultures and societies. Postscript Theories cannot be based on undefined foundations, such as the word society and religion. Both can be interpreted in many different ways and consequently one theory's perspective will work for their interpretation of the words religion and society. Thankfully, the definition of belief system is irrefutable and so has little controversy when applied and built on. There is more than one approach to perspectives of religion and society and unfortunately many authors and critics I have read have allowed themselves to become fixated with useless simplified criticism. For example, all textbooks critique functionalist approaches by stating the perspective emphasises the positive contributions of religion to society while ignoring the dysfunctional aspects. They would be well advised to notice the word functional, not dysfunctional in 'functionalist approach' and stop writing about the blinding obvious. Only a fool would criticise the dictionary definition of a cat by saying it needed to encompass the definition of a dog. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    the only way the poor will escape poverty will be through their own political action and the clergy must play a role by expressing the discontent of the poor from the pulpit. Another example is Nazi Germany where priests opposed Hitler and South Africa where many of the clergy spoke out against Apartheid, led by Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

  2. The following essay will use the ideas of Durkheim to construct my social biography ...

    created by past and present generations .As stated by Haralambos (1980 p. 3) "The individual is not born a member of society, but becomes a member of society". Thus sense of identity is dependent on culture. The process where we learn our culture, develop an identity and become a member of society is known as socialisation.

  1. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    This is important because this could arguably be seen as the forerunner of modern women's movements. If this perspective is taken then patriarchy theory loses some of its affect because women can be seen to have power and hence not be pinned down by social control or oppressed by religion.

  2. Functionalist views on Religion.

    God created the social world and the idea is that because he created it, it is impossible to alter. Religion disguises the true nature of the ruling class exploitation by suggesting that some people are poor because they are sinful or because God is testing them.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Rationally active asceticism, in mastering the world, seeks to tame what is creatural and wicked through work in a worldly vocation (inner-worldly asceticism); 2) contemplative POSSESSION of the holy as found in mysticism. The individual is not a tool, but a vessel of the divine.

  2. Deforestation of the Amazon Rainfores- Humanities Essay

    coffee, rubber and herbal medicine in better quality and that would in turn increase profits by a larger margin compared to the income from cattle ranching and cereals. Finally, the last step would be to make international groups and governments work together to conserve the rainforest.

  1. Pitted against Patriarchy

    Where this novel is quite different from Judith Hearne is in its portrayal of the family unit. In Judith Hearne, the O'Neill family is set up as an institution which is a strong and powerful ideal with the father as the head.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    Migrants generally displayed incompatible values and norms to that of their host, such as being noisy with gregarious personas, less particular regarding housekeeping standards and were more inclined to be living together out of wedlock. Paterson stated that "No migrant group has in the mass so signally failed to conform to these expectations and patterns as have the West-Indians".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work