• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the key concepts within and state the similarities and differences between Marxism and Functionalism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the key concepts within and state the similarities and differences between Marxism and Functionalism. In my essay I will attempt to explain, through the use of course texts, class notes and online material, the similarities and differences between the conflict theory of Marxism and the consensus theory of Functionalism. I will make use of various perspectives including that of Karl Marx for conflict theory and Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons and Davis & Moore for functionalist theory. Marxism is often referred to as a conflict theory. To Marx, "history was seen as a record showing how individuals organise themselves to satisfy their material needs for food, shelter and clothing". The two main features (Haralambos & Holborn, 2004, xvi) of Marxism are as follows:- 1. The Means of Production which included the land, factories, capital, labour, machinery and the scientific and technical knowledge. All these factors were used in the production of material goods. 2. The Relations of Production which were the social relationships one entered into in order to produce the material goods. The means of production gave rise to a distinct set of social relationships that developed between those who owned the means of production, the bourgeoisie and those who did not, the proletariat. ...read more.

Middle

Talcott Parsons refined Durkheim's theory further and argued (Haralambos & Holborn, op cit, 940) that society could be analysed in terms of four basic functional needs that society had to meet in order for it to function. These were known as functional prerequisites:- Adaptation (Lawson & Garrod, 2003, 3) - how societies adapt to and shape their environment to meet their own needs for example, food and shelter has to be provided in order to meet the physical needs of its members. Goal Attainment (Lawson & Garrod, op cit, 114) - this is the need for all societies to set goals in order to direct social activity. The institution of the government sets goals and allocates resources for their achievement. Integration (Lawson & Garrod, op cit, 138) - This is the adjustment made in the social system for conflict. The legal system is the institution assigned to meet this need and the law standardises relationships between individuals to reduce the potential for conflict. Should conflict arise the courts will deal with it. Pattern Maintenance (Lawson & Garrod, op cit, 150) - this is the maintenance of the basic pattern of values within society. ...read more.

Conclusion

They see human activity as a product of social structure and both place great emphasis on society being an external structure containing the individual. Although Marxist theory is one of class conflict within a capitalist society, it to be replaced by a more equal communist society and we can see that in this respect it is not that far removed from the functionalist approach of harmony and resolution. Whilst it can be seen that there is indeed a divide between the perspectives in relation to the separate institutions within society, it is fair to say that all societies throughout history have a degree of consensus over values and at some point have had their fair share of conflict. Whether they are relevant to today's society as separate perspectives remains to be seen and they are indeed best applied depending on the standpoint of the individual, in that elements of them are relevant whilst others are not. In the words of Anthony Giddens "societies can no longer be understood through the application of general theories". If society is to be studied then it should be from a wide range of theories and approaches rather than just from the structuralist point of view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

    4 star(s)

    Additionally his picture is largely based on the American middle-class family that he treats as representative of American families in general. As Morgan states there are no classes, no regions, no religious, ethnic or status groups, no communities, in Parsons's analysis of the family.

  2. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    Many live events get changed due to Sky Sports as they have a major control over how each sport is broadcasted. They purpose select the times of the events changing them around to best suit their needs as this will make the most profit.

  1. The differences and similarities between functionism, marxism, and social action theory.

    Which brings me to Marxism. Like functionalism Marx (1818-1883) sees society as a system, they both regard it as structural, the functionalist recognises the family and education and religion as the basis for the structure and Marxism sees society as a structure divided into two major parts, the economic base or infrastructure and the rest of society i.e.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    [Haralambos & Holborn 6th ed.] For example within the family there are a number of roles such as mother, father, brother or sister which in turn are governed or structured by a set of relating norms. Therefore institutions such as the family, religion, law, education and political systems can be

  1. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    Each part of the body i.e. the heart/family, lungs/workplace and brain/government, have a particular job to fulfil within the overall system. However, you need them to be working in conjunction for the system to work properly. In a similar way it is the contribution we make within our society, which enable us to flourish.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    For example, 33% of West Indian men, more than 50% of Indians, approximately 50% of Pakistanis and 30% of East African Asians, occupied jobs within the metal industries that typically offer a low wage and little opportunity for promotion. Rex and Tomlinson further explained that immigrant women were also discriminated

  1. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    Those already born to privilege and attended the top schools have weathered well under meritocratic selection and if anything it has worked to their advantage. "The most outstanding schools have great advantages in meritocratic competition. Their pupils already come to them from privileged backgrounds.

  2. Main features of Functionalism.

    The introduction of concepts such as dysfunctions and the positive functions of social conflict in its role in systematic change have tended to weaken the general criticism of functionalism as a theory promoting the status quo. MAIN FEATURES OF FUNCTIONALISM.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work