• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relationship between literacy, orality and sacred texts with particular reference to South Asian society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

25.05.04 Jenny S�derlind Discuss the relationship between literacy, orality and sacred texts with particular reference to South Asian society. Traditionally, the relationship between literacy and orality has been regarded in what have are arguably quite simplistic and ethnocentric terms. Lack of literacy was viewed as signifying a lack of a literary tradition and an inability to think in abstract, objective terms. Oral traditions were generally given little attention, and even when they were, they were at times subjected to sweeping generalisations. It is not until relatively recently that alternative approaches have been put forward and the perspective towards orality has changed. This new view rejects the dichotomy between 'literate' and 'oral' societies and their supposed distinctive modes of thought, challenges the idea of literacy as a neutral and purely technological entity, and attempts to explore literate and oral expression as part of their own social context. I will begin by exploring the 'simplistic' view of literacy and orality, before presenting the arguments against such a perspective, illustrating the usefulness of a more nuanced, culturally specific approach with reference to the epics and sacred texts of India. One view explicitly or implicitly shared by many social scientists is that literacy is a neutral technology which can be detached from specific social contexts. Street (1984) delineates the arguments for this perspective, referring to it as the 'autonomous' model of literacy. Those who regard literacy in this way consider it a more useful distinction to make than the older divisions of societies into primitive/modern or logical/pre-logical. While the older versions of this 'great divide' theory were based on now rejected notions of race and biological determinism, this new incarnation is based on technology, the 'technology of the intellect' as Goody (1968, cited in Street) phrases it. While Levy-Bruhl's (1926) version of the great divide theory proposed differences in cognitive capacity between members of different cultures, those appealing to literacy are merely pointing to differences in cognitive development. ...read more.

Middle

Firstly, as Street (1984) convincingly argues, the concept of literacy is not neutral, it cannot be viewed in isolation from its social context. The practices and concepts of reading and writing in a particular society depend on the context, they are embedded in an ideology. The skills and concepts that accompany literacy are not caused automatically by its inherent qualities, and there is no simple relationship between the advent of literacy and the development of logic, science, and 'civilisation'. Thus the distinction between literate and non-literate societies rests is no more tenable than earlier versions of the 'great divide' theory, as it rests on the assumption that our particular social conventions regarding literacy are superior to those of other societies. The claims made by academics about the importance of literacy for cognitive development derive from their own social context, and serve to reinforce their practices and beliefs in relation to alternative practices in other cultures. Thus Street argues for the adoption of a more 'ideological' model of literacy, taking into account the social contexts and complexities of literacy and orality in each society. As Street (1984) shows, the assumptions in the autonomous approach to the study of the impact of literacy render the 'evidence' that oral language prevents abstract thought useless. Rather than testing for some objective ability, that of being able to think abstractly, what is being tested in the studies cited by Hildyard and Olsen is explicitness. Street argues that the differences displayed in schooled and unschooled children in this has nothing to do with cognitive capacities but instead reflect the convention of explaining explicitly and 'adopting a detached role' that schools instil in its pupils. Thus Greenfield and Bernstein, without realising it, are testing for conformance to conventions, the conventions of their own system. Work by Labov (1973, cited in Street) supports this interpretation of the studies. He found that the unfamiliar and authoritarian test situation discouraged response in less well schooled children who were not used to such test situations. ...read more.

Conclusion

An example of such a use are the sacred texts of the Jains, the agamas. These derive their meaning from the oral, ritual context they are presented in, and less value is placed on their actual content. As Dundas (1992) emphasises, the agamas are not taken to be the literal words of the Mahavira (one of the founders of the Jain tradition), but as existing without human or divine origin, as fixed truths without beginning or end. Thus the original religious texts are not the sole component of the agamas, but the commentaries on these texts are also revered as sacred. The study of these texts is not recommended, it is dangerous and unwarranted if not done in the right context. The language they are written in, ardhamagadhi, furthermore, is understood only by few, which increases their inaccessibility, and maintains their exclusivity. Rather than texts to be studied, they are seen as sacred objects, and performed as spectacle. When the Kalpasutra texts are performed, for example, they are told at such speed that it is impossible to follow the narrative. Altogether, it is clear that the actual content of the texts is not so relevant. Fuller (1984) further stresses that in the rare cases that the agamas are taught to priests, this is done orally, and it is not thought that learning from books can give any deep understanding. This illustrates the complexity of the relationship between written and spoken word and shows how culturally specific their uses are. Literacy and orality are thus both context-dependent and variable. Their uses differ depending on the society under study, and thus literacy has a range of different meanings and consequences. It is therefore of greater use to look at these practices as part of a whole, rather than attempting to extract the practice of writing as a neutral technology that separates some societies from others. Reality is more nuanced and complex than such a dichotomy and simplistic perspective would suggest. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Comparisions of Emma and Clueless Conventions - Social Contexts

    not always distinct - at Times very confusing Courteous to girls but not forceful or overpowering Less reserved in their approach to girls More friendly and on an equal level Important to be cool, popular and look good Good manners still important to impress girls Josh rescues Cher after the

  2. Sociology Content and Analisis

    As she comes from a religious family when she was younger her being single was seen as wrong, she therefore married the first "good man" she found, despite not being in love. Luckily she learnt to love him as she wouldn't have considered a divorce no matter what.

  1. Cultural Analysis of a Person: can we read people as cultural texts

    see from the outside, I decided to reserve my judgment until we had seen inside. During our wait for the landlord to arrive, Sarah enthusiastically decides 'I really like it' I told her I thought it would make sense to wait for the landlord to show us inside before we

  2. How did the social distribution of literacy skills vary in early modern Britain, and ...

    This shows an increase in the literacy rate. This rise in literature was not the same for every person in society, as Cressy argues; 'Every study demonstrates literacy in pre-industrial England was closely and consistently associated with social and economic position'.6 The historian R.A Houston, agrees with Cressy, feeling literacy

  1. With reference to female sexuality, evaluate to which a Foucauldian analysis enables a full ...

    Foucault describes the emergence of a dominant medical discourse in modern society, which has become established and accepted as the norm (Jones 2003). We acquire discursive knowledge in the same way that we acquire language, we are unable to resist this knowledge, however this is not repressive power as it

  2. In what way have contemporary philosophers and sociologists of science challenged the view that ...

    Kuhn also argued that the production of scientific truth is always influenced by fashion and trend, and by politics and the exercise of power. Scientific knowledge is not powerful because it is true but only seems true because it is powerful.

  1. The development of Spartan society.

    were 'subject to orders and the directions of the Ephorate, in the fear of being liquidated.'12 It was therefore rather detrimental for the kings to maintain favour with the Ephorate. The notion of a 'unique' Xenophon further attests 'when (the ephors)

  2. By considering the extent to which individuals and their actions are determined and limited ...

    Through Charles in 'The French Lieutenant's Woman' we are given an insight into the consequences social defiance, we follow him from being a loving fianc�, through to becoming outlawed from his social circles. Although we follow the same journey with Hardy's characters, Fowles' retrospective, omniscient perspective means that all aspects

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work