• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

Disucss the conention that weak leadership, rather than any economic or political factor was the main reason for the failure of Chartism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was weak leadership rather than any political or economic factors, the main reason for the failure of Chartism? By Samuel Nurding Candidate Number: 0175 Centre Number: 65217 Word count: How close did Britain come to having a major working class movement cause a full-scale political revolution in mid-Victorian England? It's an intriguing question, and historians still argue the point. It is questionable that Chartism was doomed to fail from the beginning; nonetheless, weak leadership has been blamed by many historians as a vital cause for the disintegration of the Chartist movement in 1841, but to what extent is this true? Chartism was a movement established and to an extent controlled by working men in 1836 to achieve parliamentary democracy as a step towards social and economic reform. Probably the best way to interpret the implications of the movement is to appreciate that it emerged towards the end of a long period of agitation by political outsiders. The Charter made six political demands but the organisation was naive in the belief that constitutional reform would automatically provide a better socio-economical environment. Perhaps Chartism was a matter of feeling. It was an emotional reaction against a changing economy and society, which was unjust and bewildering to the working man. Great social, political and economic changes took place between 1830 and 1850, speeded up by railways. The balance shifted from old 18th century values to new commercial values; agriculture declined as industry flourished. It was an age of paradox, to determine the 'Condition of England Question'. Chartism was a paradox because it reflected this society. It attracted its support from all those with a sense of grievance - whatever the grievance was about. During the late 1830's and early 1840's, pressure for further political reform had been building up in three main areas; Firstly, in London, the home of the original London Working Men's Association and the long-established heart of radical activity. ...read more.

Middle

This discontent brought weak leadership among the Chartist leaders. Chartist never won sufficient middle class support. Many potential backers who sympathized with the six points were frightened off by the Chartists' violence and by their attacks on wealth and property, they preferred to put money into the more respectable Anti-Corn Law League as suppose to Chartism. Additionally, these divided leadership problems and violence within physical force "alienated" the public, and caused a vast deal of confusion. Regional differences started to emerge as a result bad co-ordination within the leadership. Division was so much a condition of early working-class radicalism that to expect anything different would be idealistic. Chartism therefore was destined to be lead by "unquestionably the best-loved, as well as the most hatred man in the Chartist Movement".5 Until the 1980's, judgments about O'Connor and physical force were the main motives for causing insignificant middle class support. One opponent of O'Connor claimed that Chartism would have been the better for O'Connor's absence, 'What Chartism might have been and achieved if O'Connor had not pulled it down into the gutter it would be useless to speculate'. 6 Recently, however, O'Connor has been transformed as the essential inspiration which drove Chartism on in the demanding days of the 1840's. O'Connor was questionably the most important and significant leadership because he was able to combine elements of democracy and paternalism. To historians such as Mark Hovell and J.T.Ward, O'Connor was the man who took Chartism out of the hands of thoughtful moderates and transformed it into the victim of his own megalomania. Historian David Jones attempted to explain why O'Connor had so long been undervalued: "Resentment is at the heart of early Chartist history. Broken hopes and injured pride turned memories into thinly disguised denunciations of Chartist leadership. Men who had always been wary of excessive hero-worship attacked O'Connorites for their exaggerated claims of popular support, their obstruction and inconsistencies, and their willingness to divide the Chartist body and plunge the country into revolution" 7 Historian ...read more.

Conclusion

It transformed the confidence and expectations of the working people, produced top quality journalism both informed and educated and rose to the challenge of transforming artisan radicalism into something both broader and deeper, making it more effective to the rapid changed social and economic needs of the working class population in an urban, industrial culture. In conclusion, Chartism was a failure in the political world, as it made scarcely any impression at its time, even though five out of the six points did eventually pass later on. Unquestionably weak leadership was a big factor in the failure of Chartism, but other aspects such as the better life style for working class after free trade or the governments anticipating on the Chartist movements were all causes for failure. To what extent weak leadership was the main failure to the Chartist movement can only be looked that if the Chartists had good leadership then some issues might never have occurred, such as lack of middle class support, local differences or confusion with its followers, which might have helped the Chartists in achieving their aims. Whatever the divergence and the disagreement, one key point must be stressed; Chartism marked them all. It left an everlasting legacy of independence, self-determination and often caused bloody-mindedness. I believe that David Jones's assessment of Chartism catches the essence of Chartism and why it continues to matter for up to a half-century after 1848: "The history of Chartism after O'Connor's fall from power revealed....that each person had his own order of priorities, his own definition of freedom, and his own views of the relationship between power and knowledge and between the individual and the Government. For this reason Chartists reacted differently to the economic and political progress of the mid-Victorian era. Some settled down to an advanced Liberalism; some moved into independent Labour politics, and others retired in confusion and bitterness. But almost all of them retained that tough and independent spirit which made them 'Irreconcilables'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. "The Chrysalids" - book review.

    The arrogance of Man and his lack of self criticism always lead to self destruction, as in 'The Chrysalids', and are obvious in the post nuclear society depicted there. Thus, they did not recognize that the banishment of technology only eliminates the symptom, and not the true illness, which abides deep within us.

  2. The ancient civilizations of Central and South America

    It covers an area of thirteen square kilometers in total. It mainly consists of one story houses that are a perfect model of architecture. The clay bricks that were used were all the same uniform size, and that shows great architectural minds.

  1. Assess the view that deprivation is the main reason for the growth of NRM's

    In The Social Sources of Denominationalism H. Richard Niebuhr saw sects as the "churches of the disinherited"; because of their lack of economic and political power. The less privileged needed religion most, and sects and cults could provide their members with compensation for the lack of social and personal success.

  2. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    However, of the 1960 to 1969 cohort, only 19 per cent enjoyed its hallowed portals. This, and other, data suggests a less specifically oriented club membership on the part of elites than in the past" (Stanworth 1984 p269) Another factor reducing cohesion and bringing change to the traditional organisation of

  1. Who won their debate - Miliband or Poulantzas?

    an aggregate, via the dispositions and interactions of the individuals making up particular classes. Poulantzas in his criticism argues that the interpersonal ties between individual members of the dominant class were largely irrelevant to the argument, because the state and social class were social structures and could not therefore be reduced to the personal characteristics of their members.

  2. Is Delinquency a major factor in youth culture, what theory best explains delinquency?

    An already disillusioned electorate sought a scapegoat. Crime, particularly that of young people, was back on the agenda." "Just as the response to young people's offending in the 1960's had been to impose more treatment, the response in the 1990's was to impose more punishment" One area of delinquency associated

  1. Environmental Lessons From History.

    In her book Participating Forestry: The Process of Change in India and Nepal Mary Hobley describes how, in the early 1950's, many states in India settled on an ideal of collaboration between sustainable tree growth, agriculture and local people. This has now led to a greater awareness of the limits of deforestation.

  2. The Origins of Chartism.

    Appeared as an extension of government interface without any gains for the workers. E) Introduction of police forces in the localities. Which many workers regarded as part of the government policy of repression. F) Collapse of the Grand National Consolidated Trades Unions (1834.)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work