• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do macro-sociological approaches or micro-sociological approaches tell us more about why some pupils under-achieve in school?

Extracts from this document...


Do macro-sociological approaches or micro-sociological approaches tell us more about why some pupils under-achieve in school? Macro-sociology approaches offer explanations for social phenomena in terms of the way in which social systems work as a whole. Micro-sociology gives explanations in terms of how people make things happen by interpreting their experience and acting on their interpretations. Macro-sociology divides into consensus and conflict approaches. The former view society as similar to the human body, where everyone functions together to enable society to work well. Functionalists believe that society is run in the best interest for everyone. Conflict theories view society as a constant struggle between classes, caused by the individuals relationship to the economic system. Functionalism is the main consensus perspective. As with functionalist analysis in general the view of education tends to focus on the positive contributions made by education to the maintenance of the social system. Functionalists see school as society in miniature where the individual develops a sense of commitment to the social group; a place to learn rules and co-operate with people other than kin or friends, school prepares the individual to learn how to conform in society. ...read more.


It enforces class differences by helping the middle-class to succeed while preventing working class children from fulfilling their true potential. According to Poulantzaz the school is just part of the Ideological State Apparatus concerned with the manipulation of values and beliefs. Educational failure is thus seen as due to the fact that schools are a mainly middle-class institution. Different groups have fundamentally different ideas and interests and therefore education will benefit some more than others. There are various conflict theories which give different views about educational failure. For example Marxist approaches argue that the education system imposes the dominant values of the ruling class on the population; grades children according to their class background; trains people for jobs in order to produce greater profit; makes failure inevitable for the majority of the population, as it is the point of the system - to achieve and legitimise this failure. Bowles and Gintis believed "Equality is an Illusion" in education as it is in the whole of society. They suggest that the prime purpose of schooling is to produce a willing, subservient workforce which will continue to help make profits for the ruling class and not to challenge their dominance of society. ...read more.


Macro-sociology and micro-sociology are not necessarily inconsistent with each other. Sometimes the one can compliment the other, particularly interationism and conflict theory. For example Sharp and Green who combine structural factors such as class race, gender etc. with the activities and perceptions of teachers - the interactionist approach. After studying a progressive primary school they argue that pressures from both within the school and the wider society ensure that teachers tend to have higher expectations from middle-class pupils. Macro research reveals the higher the social class the higher the levels of educational achievement, but this approach does not take into account such factors as gender, race, religion etc. Similarly, micro-sociology describes the mechanism of educational failure rather than explaining it. Therefore it is difficult to reach a reliable explanation without analysing from both perspectives. Education is such a vast area; the question of why some pupils underachieve in school is complex and has many answers. It is therefore unfair to look at this area from just a micro or macro perspective. To really understand the reasons behind under-achievement and give accurate analysis, you need to consider all perspectives, and take into account factors such as gender, race and class. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    This is known as the American dream - where everyone has the chance/opportunity to be wealthy and a success.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Practical Constraints - Time - Lengthy research = not possible e.g. longitudinal study/P.O. If a quick response = desired - adopt soc. survey method. Money - if limited funds are available a comparatively cheap method needs to be found e.g.

  1. Putman's sociological theories

    Recent research on women's homeownership has shown that women are more likely to informally interact with their neighbors and take a lead in building a sense of community at the neighborhood level. (Gittell, Bustamante and Steffy, 1999). The current emphasis in public policy initiatives and foundation funding on comprehensive community

  2. Early sociological commentators can be characterised as either conflict or consensus theorists'. Discuss.

    Early sociological thinker Emile Durkheim focused on the concepts of social solidarity and socialisation, providing the basis for the work of Parsons. Social order and socialisation are the key processes for Parsons in attaining equilibrium. Socialisation is important as it is the mechanism for transferring the accepted norms and values of a society to the individuals within the system.

  1. "Are Children Born to Succeed or Fail".

    (See graph 1 at the end of the investigation) From this table I can see that out of 12 companies included 7 of 12 managers are male. Also in the 12 companies interviewed there was in total 44 people on management team, 52% of them are male.

  2. The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory

    It was inevitable that the compassionate, more civilised traits of humankind would emerge, to recognise that such treatment of even criminals was becoming not only ineffective, but also cruel and inhumane. Indeed, Beccaria promoted the concept of proportionate punishment and the protection of criminals, focusing on prevention rather than vengeful punishment.

  1. Cranford - A micro analysis of pages 1-4

    "Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots making a soft black drizzle, with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snow-flakes - gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun." (p13) From the offset it is clear that although both novels are from the same era there content and tone are completely dissimilar.

  2. In order for us to understand why sociological theories could be classified into 'consensus' ...

    Well, first let us look at Karl Marx and Conflict theory; there are two interpretations or paradigms of Marx's theory of conflict, Radical Humanism & Radical Structuralism. The works of Marx in his early years was interpreted by some social theorists as emphasizing the role of human beings in social conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work