• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does The Nuclear Family constitute an ideal living arrangement for individuals and society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does The Nuclear Family constitute an ideal living arrangement for individuals and society? This essay intends to critically analyse the nuclear family in order to determine whether it constitutes an ideal living arrangement for individuals and society. I will therefore look at different sociologists views on the nuclear family, whilst incorporating information from the items o come to a conclusion as to whether the nuclear family can be considered to be an ideal living arrangement for everyone. Traditionally, the nuclear family was one in which a family consisted of two parents- a mother and father figure and at least one child, whom lived on one house together. Functionalists today still see the nuclear family as a norm in modern industrial society, contributing to the well being of society through its functions; it is the primary agent of socialisation, teaching shared norms and valued- the members become 'personality factories' as Parsons called them. He also argued that the Beth theory is present in the nuclear family, the bath being the males family. (Somewhere for him to get rid of his stress.) Functionalists also say that the family functions in order to control members on a daily basis i.e. marriage functions to control sexual relationships. However, Functionalists views are seen to be very positive, and do not reflect real life. ...read more.

Middle

Marxists believe that the family, along with education systems and mass media pass on the ideology of the ruling class. Socialisation of this ideology of the ruling class therefore attempts to maintain false class consciousness by winning the hearts and minds of the working class- the expectation of 'good parents' means hat parents must work in order to provide material comforts and good life chances for their children, therefore, they were willing to work boring, unsatisfying and unrewarding jobs. This stopped them from taking action that might dispute the system. However, due to the industrialisation of society, these functions of the nuclear family can be disputed- there is a decline of marriage and growth of cohabitation- indicating that the nuclear family is not an ideal living arrangement for all individuals, and the fact that there are more births outside of marriage indicates hat it is not ideal for society either. Rising divorce rates, leading to re-marriage and the growth of the constituted family has lead to a decline in family size and the growth in 'single hood.' This could be seen as a weakening of extended kinship links and therefore, in modern day society, the functions of the nuclear family could be questioned. Although there may be some families and aspects of society that the nuclear family would seem ideal in their living arrangements to, the above facts indicate that this is not true of all families. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both Murdock and Parsons portrayed the image of the family as having well adjusted children and sympathetic spouses who care or each other's needs. Whereas functionalists say the family meets the needs of society by socialising children into shared norms and values leading to social harmony and stability, Marxists would say the family reproduces capitalism and meets the needs of capitalism by the ruling class norms and values, leading to a submissive and obedient workforce, giving stability for capitalism. For one reason or another, aspects of all these sociologists viewpoints of the nuclear family can be faulted and seen as both realistic an untrue in modern day society. In conclusion, although some aspects of a nuclear family remain today, an increase in the number of families such as single parent, foster children and the constituted family means that although there may be some families who feel that the nuclear family constitutes an ideal living arrangement for individuals and society, there are a large number of families who it would not be ideal for, whether it be because the male is not the breadwinner, as indicated in item b, because of a divorce in the family, or a birth outside of marriage leading to a "nuclear family" never being achieved, or being achieved and then lost. Therefore, the nuclear family can be constituted as an ideal living arrangement for individuals and society, but not for every member of society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    Also, because of the people I chose to interview were not all from different cultures, their answers cannot be representative of all the different cultures within society. Despite this, the interviews were a great help when answering my first aim.

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    However, contrary to this idea, R Chester (7) (1985) argues, "The nuclear family and marriage remain the normative experience for the great majority of Britons. This view is mirrored by J Bernardes (8) (1997), "Despite enormous real world variation and diversity, a common and popular image of the nuclear family is a young similarly aged white married, heterosexual couple with a small number of healthy children...

  1. Assess the Claim that the Nuclear Family is Universal.

    poverty is the basic cause of matrifocal families, which year after year has become the norms for West Indian families. Marxists would view the family as social control and reproduces capitalist society Although I couldn't find any research to back this statement up, in my opinion, from a realistic view

  2. Sociology - Womens and housework

    as the respondent answers the same questions in the same order and also by using self-completion questionnaire it'll be easier for me to take the results down and analyze it, and besides self-completion questionnaire reduce bias as there are no verbal or visual clues to influence the respondent's opinions.

  1. Assess the argument that decline in marriage and the increase in both cohabitation and ...

    For example, is it socially and personally preferable for two people who have grown to hate each other intensely to "stay together for the sake of the children" - or are the consequences of this potentially far more serious (in terms of violence, child socialisation and so forth)

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    The symmetrical nuclear family began to emerge because of social changes, which made the extended family less important as a source of support, and the family became nuclear. They conducted research in 1950, which showed that extended family existed in large numbers even in this late stage of industrialisation and

  1. Pitted against Patriarchy

    Most of the scenes take place in the parlour and living rooms, the heart of the home and family over which the wife and mother preside. It is the one aspect of the community toward which all others strive and an inability to achieve this, results in further isolation and in Judith Hearne's case, crisis.

  2. The links between school bullying and mugging and there affects on individuals lives.Is it ...

    (Cohen, 1955). By creating specific sub cultures, members, predominately young males, allowed themselves to achieve status positions within a structured group therefore satisfying their desire for some form of status (Cohen, 1955). These sub cultures often resulted to violent and aggressive behaviour towards their peer groups, taunting and victimising other youths, both physically and psychologically.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work