• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Durkheim is a consensus theorist, he supports the view that religion is a conservative force in society, reinforcing the existing society of society.

Extracts from this document...


Durkheim is a consensus theorist, he supports the view that religion is a conservative force in society, reinforcing the existing society of society. He argued that religion should not be explained in terms of human ignorance, but as a result of shared social needs. He adopted a broad definition of religion throughout his analysis and defined it as a unified belief system of beliefs about the nature of sacred things. For Durkheim, shared religious belief systems were central to common consensus as they set rules for social interaction and offered social solidarity and value consensus. Durkheim viewed religion as being a major source of social integration, all religious activity has one main function, the celebration of the community. Religion is not about the worship of god, but of society. People are drawn together through religious activity and this helps to create a value consensus and a common belief system containing the collective morality of that society. Durkheim saw religion as being social cement, binding people together. Durkheim's conclusions are based on his analysis of modern society. Durkheim said that in order to understand religion it is vital to recognize the difference between the sacred (spiritual/religious) and the profane. ...read more.


The existing social order and hierarchy was justified as religion explained that it was decided by God. The oppressed accepted this philosophically as they believed there was nothing that they could do about it. Religion made the proletariats unsatisfactory lives bearable and it gave them hope in the future (in the form of an afterlife) and explained to them that there was nothing they could do to change their situations. Marx also saw religion as creating false class consciousness, whereby the subject class were blinded to their situation and therefore the interests of the ruling class, powerful and elite, were maintained. Religion was, in essence, another part of the ruling class ideology, i.e. the pervading ideas of the ruling class in society which ensure that the existing social order of capitalism continued. Orthodox Marxist sees religion as integrating, stabilizing and regulating people's behaviour Feminists argue that religion is a conservative force in society and prevents social change, allowing the ongoing dominance of the patriarchy and of male ideology within society, thus preventing women from fully achieving equal rights. This is not a desirable effect for feminists who say that women will not be equal while religion plays an important part in society as it promotes the male dominated existing social order. ...read more.


on society as it helped capitalism to start off. Neo-Marxists dispute Carl Marx's original position and agree with Weber in saying that religion can produce social change. It is believed that Engel's was the first to recognize that religion may be a vehicle of social change. This is demonstrated through looking back in time when early Christian sects resisted Roman rule - this shows that religion could be a source of resistance. A more recent account of the potential revolutionary force of religion is demonstrated in the following claim of the neo-Marxist Otto Manduro; Religion is not necessarily a functional, reproductive or conservative factor in society. It is often one of the main and sometimes the only available channel to bring about a social revolution. This claim is demonstrated by looking at; the Nationalist and Loyalist Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland, and the 1979 revolution in Iran when the Iranian royal family was deposed and Iran was turned into a strict Islamic fundamentalist state It can be said that religion is a key agent of socialisation, that is, although it may cause a certain amount of change its primary effect on society is one of stability and cohesion. There are more cases of religion being a conservative force in society than there is of it being a radical one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that religion is a conservative force within society (40).

    5 star(s)

    Durkheim said that in order to understand religion it is vital to recognize the difference between the sacred (spiritual/religious) and the profane (not religious/secular). He believed that sacred items are assigned their spirituality by society and are an embodiment of the core values which society strives to embrace.

  2. Evaluate the view that Religion acts as a conservative force in modern society.

    The way people see the world can ultimately change the way they react in society. These meanings can be altered and even forged by Religion. For example, Global warming has caused a large amount of people to take their emissions into consideration to preserve the Gods earth.

  1. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    New Religious Movements are often synonymously intertwined with merchandise like videos and ornaments and are run like businesses. There is also the view of the feminists which is a more modern structuralist interpretation. They believe that religion serves to maintain the patriarchal characteristics of society.

  2. The Role of Religion As a Conservative Force and As an Indicator of Change.

    Religion as an indicator of social change The Marxist Otto Maduro (82) recognised that religion in some special circumstances could bring about radical change. He argued that ruling elites sometimes blocked all conventional avenues for change, e.g.

  1. Is religion a force for social change?

    and adopted them as their mascots. By worshipping these objects they were celebrating their own society. Religion, Durkheim proposed, performs a number of functions; it provides stability and cohesion within society, it gives people a social identity (for example, Muslim, Christian), it provides a collective conscience - morality, it causes

  2. Defining religion.

    the present life o Also serves the interests of ruling class because those who accept existing inequality in the hope of better things to come are less likely to challenge the status quo o Lenin "Religion is a kind of spiritual gin in which the slaves of capital drown their

  1. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    Recent debacles concerning the war in Iraq and the subsequent resignation of Clare Short clearly highlights that outward disagreement against the majority intention is simply not acceptable. From the above information, it is clear that both the political and judicial elite have the capability to exercise a great deal of power.

  2. Critical Appreciation on George Ritzer's "The McDonaldization of Society."

    The study illuminates many key features of McDonald's fast food chains, and its applicability of its principles to a variety of other existing phenomenon is dazzling. However, Ritzer's interpretation is primarily negative, and an extra list of the positive features of McDonaldization was included in an updated version of his study in 1996.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work