• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate 2 social theories of crime

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Two Sociological Theories to Crime and Deviance Sociological perspectives on society are divided into two areas; Structural and Action Theories. Both these theories aim to describe how society is structured, and what contributes to that make up. This document will look at the structural theories in relation to crime. It aims to show how two sociological theories can be used to analyse crime and give differing views. The structural theory looks at society as a whole. This is called a macro theory as it takes an overall view of society. The basis of this theory is how the structure of society impacts on human behaviour. The two perspectives that will be looked at are Functionalist and Marxist they both agree that society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society Crime and Deviance is part of our society. To clarify the meaning of both words in the context of this essay; crime is an unlawful criminal act, whereas deviance is a behaviour which is not a social norm (breaking the social rules). Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century many researchers into the phenomena of crime regarded crime as a social science in which modern scientific methods could be applied to. ...read more.


It allows the boundaries to be made clear to everybody although he acknowledges that too much crime is bad for society and it could help to bring about its collapse. A Functionalist would believe that the social stability is of paramount importance, problems in society can be solved through social reform rather than radical action. Durkheim had a belief in crime and deviance not just being the makeup of a few 'sick' individuals but is part of society and performs an important function. But there are criticisms in his theories and he doesn't completely explain why some people offend whereas others do not and there is no argument on laws and their validity on how they benefit society as a whole. Marxists would strongly criticise the way Durkheim seems to be ignorant of the 'concepts of power' and how a small number of people in power have an influence in setting laws and boundaries whereas the majority have no sat at all and to abide by these laws. The Functionalist view of crime seems to ignore the fact that conflict and power does exist in society. ...read more.


Both concepts were interesting and provided thought and the pioneers of both set precedence and have long since been adapted by others. However both the perspectives ignore the individual motivation for crime. The question of the mental state of an individual hasn't even been raised by any of the sociologists to explain why a person may offend. Marxism has it criticisms and concepts that aren't always backed up with fact. There isn't any clear argument regarding individual motivation to commit crime only that it gets completely caught up with the concept that capitalism is the root cause. The view on high crime and the criminal being the black working class youth and biased policing and that they are simply forced into crime due to unfair laws only suiting the purpose of the wealthy and more privileged. It doesn't explain how someone of a middle class background could fall into and take on a crime spree. There is a belief in the manipulation of values, that laws are created to control and enforcement to further re-iterate the control but dismisses entirely that an individual may simply by their own choosing become a criminal. XVZ V ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 Andrea Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    Cohen suggested that 'prostitution performs such a safety valve function without threatening the institution of the family'. It provides a release from the pressures and stresses of family life without ruining the families' stability, due to the fact that when a man goes to a prostitute there is not an emotional attachment.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    Those from a poor background may have the academic capabilities but because they lack the necessary class status, they will not be able to achieve as highly as those with the inherited social status. The Bowles and Gintis theory on the hidden curriculum places itself open to criticism because it appears to generalise.

  1. Sociological Theory and Methodology - Crime and Deviance.

    was males aged 21-34. This can be attributed to males of this age group being more likely to be risk takers. There has also been a rise in the crime committed by women, with a rise in the ladette culture perpetuated by beer drinking celebrities such as Zo� Ball and female radio DJ's.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    must allow themselves to be re-socialised in to the accepted cultural values and norms of the British population. This procedure involved the migrants conforming to all the traditional British customs, such as, conforming to formal marriage ceremonies, queuing at bus stops, lowering their unrealistic expectations and ensuring prevention of 'chip-on-the-shoulder' attitudes.

  1. Causes of Crime

    Take for instance the Columbine Shooting. The two students involved were the "odd ones" of the school and people knew they were isolated and probably made fun of. It did not seem as if the teachers or parents had much concern about the two and this ended in a mass murder.

  2. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    Criminals can be just as shocked by the acts of other and can show remorse and offer explanations for their crimes. Labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is expected

  1. Critically evaluate Marxist approaches to crime and deviance.

    Walton and Young, where they looked at Marxism and linked crime to the wider society. The new criminology was intended to provide an alternative to existing theories of crime and deviance, and its objective was to synthesise structure and action theory.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Politics, then, means striving to share power or striving to influence the distribution of power, either among states or among groups within a state. The state is a relation of men dominating men by means of legitimate violence (you already know the three ways it can get legitimated, so I'm not telling you).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work