• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate 2 social theories of crime

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Two Sociological Theories to Crime and Deviance Sociological perspectives on society are divided into two areas; Structural and Action Theories. Both these theories aim to describe how society is structured, and what contributes to that make up. This document will look at the structural theories in relation to crime. It aims to show how two sociological theories can be used to analyse crime and give differing views. The structural theory looks at society as a whole. This is called a macro theory as it takes an overall view of society. The basis of this theory is how the structure of society impacts on human behaviour. The two perspectives that will be looked at are Functionalist and Marxist they both agree that society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society Crime and Deviance is part of our society. To clarify the meaning of both words in the context of this essay; crime is an unlawful criminal act, whereas deviance is a behaviour which is not a social norm (breaking the social rules). Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century many researchers into the phenomena of crime regarded crime as a social science in which modern scientific methods could be applied to. ...read more.


It allows the boundaries to be made clear to everybody although he acknowledges that too much crime is bad for society and it could help to bring about its collapse. A Functionalist would believe that the social stability is of paramount importance, problems in society can be solved through social reform rather than radical action. Durkheim had a belief in crime and deviance not just being the makeup of a few 'sick' individuals but is part of society and performs an important function. But there are criticisms in his theories and he doesn't completely explain why some people offend whereas others do not and there is no argument on laws and their validity on how they benefit society as a whole. Marxists would strongly criticise the way Durkheim seems to be ignorant of the 'concepts of power' and how a small number of people in power have an influence in setting laws and boundaries whereas the majority have no sat at all and to abide by these laws. The Functionalist view of crime seems to ignore the fact that conflict and power does exist in society. ...read more.


Both concepts were interesting and provided thought and the pioneers of both set precedence and have long since been adapted by others. However both the perspectives ignore the individual motivation for crime. The question of the mental state of an individual hasn't even been raised by any of the sociologists to explain why a person may offend. Marxism has it criticisms and concepts that aren't always backed up with fact. There isn't any clear argument regarding individual motivation to commit crime only that it gets completely caught up with the concept that capitalism is the root cause. The view on high crime and the criminal being the black working class youth and biased policing and that they are simply forced into crime due to unfair laws only suiting the purpose of the wealthy and more privileged. It doesn't explain how someone of a middle class background could fall into and take on a crime spree. There is a belief in the manipulation of values, that laws are created to control and enforcement to further re-iterate the control but dismisses entirely that an individual may simply by their own choosing become a criminal. XVZ V ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 Andrea Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The following essay will use the ideas of Durkheim to construct my social biography ...

    In my conclusion I would like to mention one last theory by Anthony Giddens who incorporates both structure and agency in his theory. Giddens believes that there is a complex interplay between structures in society and our social action as agents. Bilton, Bonnet, Jones, Lawson, Skinner, Stanworth, Webster (2002 p.18)

  2. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    The ruling class uses the state and only passes laws that will enable the ruling class to control the subject class. Marxists argue that laws are not for everyone in society but are an indication of the ruling class philosophy and consequently laws are not beneficial to society as a whole but are only beneficial to the ruling class.

  1. Evaluate the subcultural theories of crime

    Their final subculture is known as the retreatist subculture. They claim this is mainly based around illegal drug use, because they failed to succeed in all social structures, and, in this sense, are seen as double failures. Walter Miller did not believe that a deviant subculture arose from the inability

  2. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". According to Becker, after the individual has been labelled as deviant, they progress down the path of a 'deviant career' and it becomes hard to shake off the deviant label as others see it as a master status of the individual.

  1. Compare and contrast the six main sociological theories of religion as well as examining ...

    Worshipping the totem, as the aborigines do, means worshipping society. Religion, therefore, really consists of reverence for the central values of any society. Every time a religious ceremony takes place, the group affirms its belief in the central values. Religion clearly involves a spiritual dimension, and the individual in ceremonies feels him/herself in contact with supernatural forces.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    A criticism of functionalism is that it seems to place too much emphasis on the power of the school in regards to shaping peoples attitudes. Functionalism seems to overlook the role of the family once the child is at school when it comes to obeying rules.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    and Islam, and they are chosen because they have a large number of followers, and for no other reason. He will also consider Judaism, since it is an important precursor to Christianity and Islam and because of its significance for the development of the economic ethic of the West.

  2. Outline and evaluate Marxist theories of crime.

    which provides a free health service for all and is paid for out of the taxes which members of the ruling class have to pay. Another pair of questions used as the basis of the Marxist theory are, who breaks the law, and who gets caught?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work