• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the Contribution that Subculturalist theory has made to our Understanding of Deviant Behaviour.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the Contribution that Subculturalist theory has made to our Understanding of Deviant Behaviour Deviance is defined as behaviour that challenges widely accepted norms and values. It is generally non-conformist and usually attracts moral disapproval from members of society. Many theories have developed, especially in the past 100 years concerning deviance. Subcultural theories developed around the 1950's and followed sociological schools of thought such as physiological and sociological theories. They differ from structural theories of deviance as they explain its origins in terms of the position of the individual in society whereas subcultural theories explain deviance in terms of the subculture of a particular group. That is, certain groups develop norms and values which are different from those held by other members of society. The theory is fairly deterministic and mainly focuses on working class males. This is a criticism in itself as other forms of crime are largely ignored. Subculturalist theory attempts to contribute to our understanding of deviant behaviour, an issue I will discuss. Firstly, Robert K Merton (1938) explains how deviance can result from the culture and structure of society. He primarily begins from a functionalist perspective - that all members of society share the same values. He believes that all members of society strive for the same goal of success which is largely measured in material possessions and wealth. Merton therefore assumes that society is meritocratic. ...read more.


Also the research is only of males who, in addition, must be excellent sociologists to work out middle class values and deliberately attempt to invert them. Another set of Subculturalist sociologists are Cloward and Ohlin (C&O). Richard A Cloward and Lloyd E Ohlin in 1961 wrote 'Delinquency and Opportunity'. Although they accepted Merton's explanation of deviance in term of legitimate opportunity structure, they criticised him for failing to consider the illegitimate opportunity structure. Just as the opportunity to succeed by legitimate means varies so does the means by which to succeed illegitimately. An example is an 18-year lad in an environment where there may be a thriving deviant subculture will have more opportunity to become a successful criminal in an area that does not have such a culture. Similarly to Merton, Cloward and Ohlin believe that working classes are more likely to deviate due to greater pressure, as there is less opportunity to succeed by legitimate means. C & O have identified three possible responses to this situation - Criminal subcultures - a thriving local community of organised deviant and criminal activity. Young people have the opportunity to rise within an established hierarchy. Conflict subcultures - develop in areas where there is little access to either legitimate or illegitimate opportunity structures. Gang warfare develops to serve a release of anger and frustration. Retreatist subcultures - (Merton would refer to these as having no means nor goals to achieve neither legitimately or illegitimately) ...read more.


For example - denial of responsibility or loyalty to higher causes than the law. These might be 'I was drunk' or 'I was just defending my mate'. Matza argues that the use of techniques of neutralization make us doubt the idea of deviant subcultures. This is firstly because their existence is evidence of guilt and shame which suggests at least a partial acceptance of mainstream values. Secondly, one set of mainstream values is sometimes used to justify breaking another. For example, assaulting homosexuals could be justified since it supports mainstream sexual behaviour. There are critiques to Matza's attack on subculturalist theory however. Box (1981) questioned the evidence that Matza used. Delinquents may not be sincere when they say that they regret their actions. Jones (1998) adds that Matzo's theory cannot adequately explain persistent delinquency and violent acts. In conclusion to my essay, I identified the contribution that subculturalist theory has in allowing society in understanding deviant behaviour. It is fair to comment that the theories must be relevant and useful as there have been recent studies based on the original theories where evidence has been proved in modern day society. However, as research methods, sampling techniques and researcher bias have a strong impact on case study findings, subculturalist theory may not be as relevant as once thought. Despite this, I believe that subculturalist theory has allowed sociology to progress giving future researchers a basis of theory upon which to use - either to prove or disprove the various thesis's. Sarah Lee Sarah Lee ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

    4 star(s)

    dependency and the nature of the family denies women the opportunity to participate in the wider society and achieve equality with men. Feminists challenge functionalist's views that women are sensitive, patient and kind by nature, with their expressive role involving them looking after men, children and the home.

  2. Assess the contribution of functionalist theory to our understanding of society

    The concept of functionalism is what the functionalists use to describe the relationship between the individual aspects of society in relation to the whole. They outline all institutions as beneficial but three as indispensable as well, which in modern sociology it is still the case.

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    FCC = particularly acquired through ideological channels = consumer fetishism. Marx believed the Bourgeoisie impose their definitions of how society should be on the Proletariat e.g. class, opportunities and ideology. POWER = A ruling class can impose their social arrangement Possible Strengths Of Marxism 1.

  2. Evaluate the subcultural theories of crime

    They began their explanation of working class delinquency from the same point as Merton: there is a greater pressure on members of the working class to deviate for they have a lesser opportunity to succeed by legal means. Cloward and Ohlin then proceeded to distinguish three responses to the situation.

  1. Assess the usefulness of subcultural theories in understanding crime and deviance

    Secondly is the conflict subculture. Conflict subcultures tend to develop in areas where adolescents have little opportunity for access to illegitimate opportunity structures. There is little organized adult crime to provide an apprenticeship' for the young criminals and opportunities for them to climb the illegitimate ladder to success.

  2. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    Too much crime though, could bring about its collapse. This contrasts with the view that crime, by its nature, is harmful to society. Society has expectations of behaviour, based on shared values and beliefs. Boundaries of acceptable behaviour need to be defined and made common knowledge.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Science can judge these ideas and ends ONLY according to a logical and historically defined standard of value which can be elevated to a certain ''level of explicitness'' beyond individual sentiment. Science can tell a person what s/he can do, not what s/he should do.

  2. Compare and contrast white collar crimes and street crimes, while understanding the definition of ...

    Weirton Steel and its owners as an ESOP hurt itself. How could the owners let this happen? The fundamentals were unstable from the beginning. National Steel needed to sell, it was cheaper for National to sell then to revamp the organization.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work