• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the sociological arguments for and against the idea that religion is essentially a conservative force in society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Suzanne Bembridge Evaluate the sociological arguments for and against the idea that religion is essentially a conservative force in society For religion to be considered a conservative force it would need to be the case that religion prevents social change and maintains the existing order of society. Some sociologists would agree with this and others would argue against such a claim. As a result, one side would argue that religion prevents change and the other would argue that it could cause social change. One sociologist who believed that religion prevents social change was Durkheim. He believed that religion acts as a conservative force. He thought that religious worship is like worshipping society and that religious beliefs strengthen the values of that society. Durkheim's justification for this view was expressed in the practice of totemism among Australian aborigines. The totem pole was considered to be a sacred object with each clan having an individual symbol on the totem. The carvings on the pole are meaningful to that society and everything from the group's history to its very existence is invested in the pole. Durkheim saw religion in this case as a means of reaffirming the collective conscience. However, there can be criticisms made of this view. One criticism is that the theory doesn't seem to be particularly relevant in modern societies. Durkheim's view is more relevant to small pre-industrial societies. ...read more.

Middle

Weber thought that the sanctions and discipline of the Protestant ethic encouraged men rationally to achieve wealth. These aspects were, according to Weber, a major factor in industrialisation. If this were the case then it would be true that religion can play a part in social change. Weber also considered the idea of Calvinism. This held the view that people are either born among the 'elect' or not and only these 'elect' would be allowed into heaven. Wealth was considered a sign of being one of the 'elect' and therefore people would try to acquire wealth. It would appear that striving to become wealthy to fulfil religious aspirations would involve a social change among those who attempted to improve their fortune. This would seem to be a clear indication of religion as a con-conservative or radical force. In response to Marx' ideas that religion merely reaffirms communism, Weber studied non-western societies and found that other pre-industrial societies had the preconditions to begin capitalism but lacked the motives to abandon traditional ways. What makes Weber's ideas different from the structuralist views of Durkheim and Marx is that although Weber acknowledges that social forces can influence an individual's behaviour, he believes that the forces are socially produced. He describes it as being a two way process in that the individual can shape society as well as be influenced by it. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is particularly relevant in today's society with religious fundamentalism as seen in Afghanistan with the Taliban, Palestinian fundamentalists in Israel and Muslim fundamentalists in Iraq who the west would call terrorists, whilst they would refer to themselves as freedom fighters. In all these cases their fundamentalism stems from traditionally conservative forms of religion, but involves radical methods in an attempt to control the people, overthrow regimes or resist occupying forces. So is religion always conservative, always radical, or both in different circumstances? Marx and Durkheim are both associated with analyses that see religion as conservative whilst Weber is more clearly associated with the idea that in certain circumstances, especially the development of capitalism in Western Europe, religious beliefs can contribute to social change. On the other hand, the treatment of women within many religious groups can be seen as fundamentally conservative and failing to keep up with social change in the secular world. In conclusion, although the likes of Durkheim and Marx provide very good evidence of how religion may act as a conservative force, once you consider modern examples such as Islamic fundamentalism, the state of Israel and Ireland and the apparent process of secularisation, it seems that religion is not necessarily as conservative as Durkheim or Marx believe. If religion were responsible for anything, then it would seem less likely to be preserving the status quo and the social norm. If anything it would seem that religion is often a source of great conflict and surely this cannot be viewed as a conservative force. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Marriage is no longer important. Evaluate the arguments for and against

    4 star(s)

    the breadwinner of the family and with a male dominator, teaching a children typical gender roles, with married parents playing a key part in the socialization process for children. Marriage is also important, because lots of people believe that getting married is the only way you can truly show your love to your husband or wife..

  2. Evaluate the view that Religion acts as a conservative force in modern society.

    Weber believes that the number of Protestant religions which developed in the 16th century was directly responsible for the rise of capitalism. This was due to the work ethic of the 16th century, outlined in Weber's study, 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism'.

  1. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    Therefore they believe that the bible is written and promoted in a way which portrays women as inferior to men and the church itself is organised in a way which discriminates against and exploits women. This can be best seen from the fact that there was a major debate within

  2. Functionalist views on Religion.

    * Both see religion as a conservative force. It inhibits change. * Both see it as providing comfort/support to individuals. Differences * Functionalists see religion positively, it promotes value consensus, and social solidarity. Marxists see religion negatively, it hides, distorts, and legitimises inequality and perpetuates class societies.

  1. The Role of Religion As a Conservative Force and As an Indicator of Change.

    o Some religions even present suffering and poverty as a virtue to be welcomed and accepted as normal. Such ideas promote the idea that there us no point in changing the here and now. Rather, people should wait patiently for divine intervention.

  2. Is religion a force for social change?

    functional to the needs of society, and therefore a good thing, while Marx sees it as being functional only to the needs of capitalism. Halevy would agree that religion is social change inhibiting, as he claims that during the 18th and 19th centuries, discontented workers were kept only from action

  1. Defining religion.

    Religious beliefs provide guidelines for human action & standards o 10 commandments provide the basis for many social norms in Christian societies o Religion acts a way to generate social solidarity & stability o Life doesn't always follow smooth patterns - religion maintains social stability by relieving the tension &

  2. The position of widows in Nepalese society - sociological study.

    Even taday, women who are divorcees are stigmatized in the Hindu tradition. Thus, a divorced woman has litde chance of remarriage within her own sacicoconomic greup if she comes from a high caste/class Hindu family. The need, from the religious paint of view, to keep the clan blood pure is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work