• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the sociological arguments for and against the idea that religion is essentially a conservative force in society.

Extracts from this document...


Suzanne Bembridge Evaluate the sociological arguments for and against the idea that religion is essentially a conservative force in society For religion to be considered a conservative force it would need to be the case that religion prevents social change and maintains the existing order of society. Some sociologists would agree with this and others would argue against such a claim. As a result, one side would argue that religion prevents change and the other would argue that it could cause social change. One sociologist who believed that religion prevents social change was Durkheim. He believed that religion acts as a conservative force. He thought that religious worship is like worshipping society and that religious beliefs strengthen the values of that society. Durkheim's justification for this view was expressed in the practice of totemism among Australian aborigines. The totem pole was considered to be a sacred object with each clan having an individual symbol on the totem. The carvings on the pole are meaningful to that society and everything from the group's history to its very existence is invested in the pole. Durkheim saw religion in this case as a means of reaffirming the collective conscience. However, there can be criticisms made of this view. One criticism is that the theory doesn't seem to be particularly relevant in modern societies. Durkheim's view is more relevant to small pre-industrial societies. ...read more.


Weber thought that the sanctions and discipline of the Protestant ethic encouraged men rationally to achieve wealth. These aspects were, according to Weber, a major factor in industrialisation. If this were the case then it would be true that religion can play a part in social change. Weber also considered the idea of Calvinism. This held the view that people are either born among the 'elect' or not and only these 'elect' would be allowed into heaven. Wealth was considered a sign of being one of the 'elect' and therefore people would try to acquire wealth. It would appear that striving to become wealthy to fulfil religious aspirations would involve a social change among those who attempted to improve their fortune. This would seem to be a clear indication of religion as a con-conservative or radical force. In response to Marx' ideas that religion merely reaffirms communism, Weber studied non-western societies and found that other pre-industrial societies had the preconditions to begin capitalism but lacked the motives to abandon traditional ways. What makes Weber's ideas different from the structuralist views of Durkheim and Marx is that although Weber acknowledges that social forces can influence an individual's behaviour, he believes that the forces are socially produced. He describes it as being a two way process in that the individual can shape society as well as be influenced by it. ...read more.


This is particularly relevant in today's society with religious fundamentalism as seen in Afghanistan with the Taliban, Palestinian fundamentalists in Israel and Muslim fundamentalists in Iraq who the west would call terrorists, whilst they would refer to themselves as freedom fighters. In all these cases their fundamentalism stems from traditionally conservative forms of religion, but involves radical methods in an attempt to control the people, overthrow regimes or resist occupying forces. So is religion always conservative, always radical, or both in different circumstances? Marx and Durkheim are both associated with analyses that see religion as conservative whilst Weber is more clearly associated with the idea that in certain circumstances, especially the development of capitalism in Western Europe, religious beliefs can contribute to social change. On the other hand, the treatment of women within many religious groups can be seen as fundamentally conservative and failing to keep up with social change in the secular world. In conclusion, although the likes of Durkheim and Marx provide very good evidence of how religion may act as a conservative force, once you consider modern examples such as Islamic fundamentalism, the state of Israel and Ireland and the apparent process of secularisation, it seems that religion is not necessarily as conservative as Durkheim or Marx believe. If religion were responsible for anything, then it would seem less likely to be preserving the status quo and the social norm. If anything it would seem that religion is often a source of great conflict and surely this cannot be viewed as a conservative force. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that religion is a conservative force within society (40).

    5 star(s)

    are, in essence, just more complicated versions of these basic communities and they still have the same basic needs/requirements. Durkheim studied the aboriginal religion of totenism whereby certain clans associated themselves with certain objects imbued with sacred powers (birds, animals, plants)

  2. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    Therefore they believe that the bible is written and promoted in a way which portrays women as inferior to men and the church itself is organised in a way which discriminates against and exploits women. This can be best seen from the fact that there was a major debate within

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    * Functionalists (At least Durkheim) believe that there is 'something eternal about religion', although it would become less important as society evolved. Neo Marxists While accepting many of the basic Marxists traditions, Neo Marxists have adapted and developed Marxism. One adaptation is that the superstructure can have a degree of independence from the Infrastructure.

  2. Is religion a force for social change?

    functional to the needs of society, and therefore a good thing, while Marx sees it as being functional only to the needs of capitalism. Halevy would agree that religion is social change inhibiting, as he claims that during the 18th and 19th centuries, discontented workers were kept only from action

  1. The position of widows in Nepalese society - sociological study.

    a paramount factor in thus condemning women to single status for life or to a loss of social status, if her first marriage fails. In India, as in many developing countries there is no national pension scheme, although some states have (derisory)

  2. One is not born, but rather becomes a woman' (de Beauvoir 1956). Discuss the ...

    Lamb et al (1980) also studied 3 -5 year olds at play. They found boys and girls tended to play with sex-appropriate toys e.g. cars for boys and dolls for girls. They were critical of each other for playing with toys seen as more appropriate for the opposite sex.

  1. Defining religion.

    Argued that human actions directed & controlled by norms provided by the social system o Norms which direct action are affected by the values & beliefs of the cultural system Eg. Norms in Western society are expressions of the value of materialism o Religion's part of the cultural system o

  2. "Assess the different sociological accounts of the role and functions of Religious institutions in ...

    The commandment 'Thou Shalt Not Kill' can be seen to touch on situations from settling an argument through to driving a car safely. In this way religion helps to enforce essential guidelines for conduct which are expressed in a variety of norms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work