• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the view that structuralist theories of crime place too much emphasis upon the social structure as a stimulus to crime and not enough on the meaning of the act to the individual.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the view that structuralist theories of crime place too much emphasis upon the social structure as a stimulus to crime and not enough on the meaning of the act to the individual. (50 marks). In crime and deviance, the main two stucturalist theories are Functionalism and Marxism. Structuralist theories in sociology give priority to the analysis of social structures, rather than the individual. Both Functionalist and Marxist theories are macro theories, this makes them top down as they look at how society shaped the individual. Emile Durkheim is a key functionalist who suggests that societies could only exist if the members shared certain common beliefs which he called the 'collective conscience'. Functionalists believe that every part of society has a function and compared society to the human body, claiming that each part of society has to do its job in order to function properly just as in the human body. However, Marxism, a perspective that emerged from the work of Karl Marx stresses the role of conflict in society. They believe that the ruling class exploit the working class and that laws are a key tool in this process. ...read more.


As is shown here Merton's theory is really a continuation of Durkheim's theories. There are five forms of behaviour which can be understood as a strain between goals and means. Conformist- here the individual continues to adhere to both goals and means despite the limited chance of success. Innovator- is a person who accepts the goals of society but uses criminal or deviant means to reach them. Ritualist- is a person who uses accepted means but has lost sight of the actual goal. Retreatist- is where the individual ejects both the goals and the means, often become homeless and addicted to drugs and alcohol. Rebel- again rejects both the goals and the means but this time replaces them with his own ones e.g. a political activist. Merton was criticised by Valier for his stress on the existence of a common goal in society, he argues there are a variety of goals in any given society. Some sub cultural theories are functionalist from origin, for example Albert Cohen (1955) who combined both structural and sub cultural theories of deviance. Cohen believed that deviance collective rather than an individual response and criticised Merton's work for ignoring on0-utilitarian crimes such as vandalism which provide no financial reward. ...read more.


Deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label." So what he is saying is that it is not the act itself which is deviant, it's only deviant when someone puts a label on it. This view has been criticised for suggesting that deviants are no different than normal every day people. Being labelled deviant has many consequences for that person, a clear example of this comes from Edwin Lemert who distinguished between primary and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is rule breaking with little importance and secondary deviance is the consequences of the response from others - this is significant. The person labelled as deviant will eventually see themselves as bad. Becker used the term master status to describe this and says that once a label had successfully been applied to an individual all other qualities become unimportant. In conclusion it appears that the structuralist theorists do base too much emphasis on social structure and can be seen to ignore the individual. I feel that it is important to look at the factors why a person turns to crime as after all prevention is better than cure. Stucturalist theorists try too hard to put everyone into categories when everyone is different and has their own reasons for choosing to commit crime or not. ?? ?? ?? ?? Vickie Annear Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    David Hargreaves, Stephen Hester and Frank Mellor argue that teachers make sense of and respond to a student in terms of the way in which they have typed them. Hargreaves et al distinguish three stages of typing. The first stage is said to be where the teacher will speculate about

  2. Sociological Theory and Methodology - Crime and Deviance.

    The health story unfolds with a working class mother. Due to her class group it is acceptable for her to smoke during in her pregnancy this then leads to a low birth weight baby, who in turn will suffer poor health due to this factor.

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    (Rex, 1979, page 275) Rex and Tomlinson acknowledge that there is an 'overlap' pertaining to the similar experiences endured by the 'white' working class and their new West Indian and Asian 'neighbours'. However, the common ground shared between the two is menial and therefore does not warrant the supposition that

  2. Causes of Crime

    First of all, the world in which we live in depends a lot on financial standards. This includes poverty, social classes and the simple fact that money makes the world go around. However, it is not fair enough to say all criminals come from a poor background, but evidently a

  1. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    The concerns of the working-class culture can lead working-class males into crime. Crime is an extension of working-class values, not alternative ideas. Most subcultural theorists approaches emphasise that subcultural values are distinct from the majority of the population and that those within subcultural groups are subject to forces stronger than they e.g.

  2. Critically evaluate Marxist approaches to crime and deviance.

    Neo Marxists do not see structure in determining behaviour, like Marxists say or that action on the ground determines the structure like interactions say, but each has an effect on one other.

  1. Gender differnces in Crime

    Box, however has reviews self report sentences and states the majority, do not indicate leniency towards females. Crime against women is often referred to as 'gendered crime', where women are victims of men (Heidensohn 1989) e.g. domestic violence, rape, sexual harassment which often filter through the Crime Figures invisibly due

  2. Evaluate the subcultural theories of crime

    The fourth response is known as rebellion. This is a rejection of both success goals and institutionalised means, and replaces them with different goals and means. Those who adopt such beliefs want to create a new society, and Merton himself argues that it is "typically members of the rising class rather than the most depressed strata who organize the resentful and rebellious into a revolutionary group."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work