• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

examine functionalists and marxisms view on family

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist explanations of the family in 'modern' Britain. In this essay I am going to be comparing and contrasting the views of two sociologists. The sociologists I am discussing are functionalists and Marxists. Functionalists are capitalists and Marxists are communist this creates different opinions of how they think the societies family functions and I am going to be assessing different areas of society in family situations like education, rearing children, domestic work, authority within a family and general opinions of how they think the family functions in modern Britain. Modern Britain is Britain after Primitive communism and the industrial revolution. Primitive communism there was no private family and when poverty was owned collectively. The community was shared and your family was the society. ...read more.


Marxists believe that women have to do most of the domestic work around the house and claim that a women's role within society is seen as 'no better than prostitutes'. They also state domestic work is slave labour that is unpaid. The Functionalists argue against this and state that a study carried out in the 1950's showed that household tasks are becoming more shared throughout sexes. Marxists claim the women mostly do that child rearing. There beliefs are that this work is unpaid, creating more financial dominance for the males within society. A quote from 'a wives role is seen no better than prostitutes.' And this is reflecting inequalities of these members of society. Functionalists do not share this opinion and a study by Young and Wilmot stated 'Fathers are increasing participating in child care activities' Functionalist do agree that the father should have a main role of instrumental (work) ...read more.


Marxists claim that the origin of the family is purely 'private property and state'. This is critised claiming it didn't actually coincide with the emergence of capitalism. Functionalists claim that nuclear families exist all over the world and the history of religion shows that the nuclear family existed pre- revolution. Functionalists claim that the family is evitable and useful. Marxists also claim that within some employment workers cannot strike because of there responsibilities of the family. Females now in modern Britain have to work as well as rear children and Marxists claim that the society is 'oppressing' and 'Exploiting' them. The family have a large consumption rate, i.e. when children are growing up and regularly need new clothes and shoes. With tax on this Marxist claim that society is again against them and taking them away. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    outside marriage * Social Trends 1997: "In 1994 1 in 5 families with dependent children in Britain were headed by single parents, over 90% of whom were women" Research Method For my research I have chosen to complete an extensive survey to find out if the nuclear family is still the norm in British society.

  2. Assess the view that the modern family is symmetrical

    The researchers from Oxford University found that working full time has a minimal impact on the amount of time devoted to work around the house for women. Man-yee Kan, who undertook the research stated that on average women in full time employment spent nearly 12 hours a week on household

  1. Aesthetic Labour at 'Brewsters' family theme pub.

    After making me wait 45 minutes before seeing me and numerous glances from afar, he stated I was not suitable, due to the fact I was wearing trousers. Why? School sent me for the interview for work experience. I wore trousers because they were smart and it was cold, unaware that wearing them would discriminate against me.

  2. Assess the contributions that functionalists, Marxist's and feminists have ...

    Parsons' states that unless the child is taught the specific norms and values, the societies'cultre will not exist and so the society will not exist. Parsons argues that the family is a 'factory' which produces human personalities. He cannot conceive of any other social structure which could take over this function.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work