• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family The pre- industrial family was said to be an extended family consisting of three generations, the children, parents and the grandparents. The family would all work together in the farms to help provide for the entire families needs, children as young a 5 or 6 would have been found work to do. However this was until the Industrial revolution when factories become the main source of work and development. The pre-industrial societies were largely based on extended kinship networks; land and other resources were commonly owned by a range of relatives that extended well beyond the unit of the nuclear family. It was very common for families to work alongside their cousins and even live with them. This extended family was responsible for the production of the shelter, food and clothing for the family. Roles in the family were usually ascribed to the offspring rather than being achieved. These roles would hardly ever be rejected and in return for this commitment, the extended network would perform other functions for the members. The family gave its members the skills and the education in which to take their place in the family division of labour. ...read more.

Middle

Young and Willmott believed that there were four stages of the family and from those four there were three main stages. They studied family life in London (1950's - 1970's) using historical research and social surveys, this allowed them to obtain both qualitative and quantitative data. Young and Willmott say that stage one was represented by the pre industrial family. They believe that in stage one the family works together as a team for example in agriculture. They say that this family was as a result of the industrial revolution, but it continued into the nineteenth century and is still represented in the minority of families today. Stage two of their studies researched its peak in early twentieth century. The family ceased to be a unit of production due to industrial members being employed as wage earners. In early nineteenth century working class poverty was widespread and the family responded to the high unemployment by extending its network to include relatives beyond the nuclear family. The extension of the nuclear family was built by women in defence of themselves and their children. Women formed a trade union which excluded men. Young and Willmott claim husbands were pushed out of the female circle and took to the pub as their own defence. ...read more.

Conclusion

by interviewing working class women. Her research allowed her to compare with earlier findings, but she only looked women and their roles in the family so she didn't actually identify any roles changes after industrialisation. Also she only interviewed working class women so her findings fail to provide a clear representation for society. In conclusion it seems, although everyone had some theory to how and when the nuclear family came to be, no one could actually be sure. Parsons theories seem to be flawed and as Young and Wilmott suggested the speed at which Parsons suggested the evolution of the nuclear family happened seems almost exaggerated and wrong. All in all industrialisation apart from families no longer having to grow there own crops and provide for themselves, really seems to have had little effect on the family until 1960 when the nuclear family appeared in great numbers according to Young and Wilmott. Contradicting this, Laslett seems to suggest that the nuclear family has always existed but worked as an extended family and that industrialisation only occurred because of the nuclear family and not the other way around. So if Laslett is correct then there was no extended family but two nuclear families working as an extended unit, living under separate roofs. This greatly flaws Parsons and Young and Wilmot's theories of the extended family consisting of three generations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Assess the Claim that the Nuclear Family is Universal.

    In the kibbutz it is the case that sexual and reproductive functions are served through marriage. After a period of cohabitation, kibbutz members normally marry under Israeli law, yet contrary to Murdock's definition, the relationship called 'marriage' has no economic functions.

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    Using my secondary data I have collected on this topic, I can see that the extended family has gone through some changes. The secondary information I have is from two books. These are, "Themes and Perspectives" by Haralambos and Holborn and "An Introduction to Sociology" by Ken Brown.

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    Liz Steel & Warren Kid in their book "The Family" describe the nuclear family as a "mother, farther and children living together in harmony with mother looking after home and farther going to work to support the others." 2.

  2. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    The process of conducting my research went well although I would make a number of changes if I were to carry the experiment out again. For instance I decided that half an hour would be suitable and a long enough space of time for respondents to record the tasks done.

  1. What are the implications for social policy of the changes which have occurred in ...

    This change has largely been bought on by the increasing participation of women in the workforce who no longer requires male counterparts for financial stability. In Europe in the 1960s, 48.73% of women were in the workforce compared to almost 70% in 1999.

  2. The Nuclear family

    From the 1960's onwards Feminists and Marxists questioned whether the family was a beneficial institution and they began to expose the dark side of the family. Feminist perspectives have varied strands of theories such as Marxist Feminists, Liberal Feminists and Radical Feminists; they state that the nuclear family benefits men

  1. As a forty-four year old lady with a family, I was very nervous about ...

    were to late for the dinner time then you would not be aloud any food! D-deck was a very lively deck, though with not much entertainment provided by the crew, we had to provide our own entertainment such as observing the view, painting and talking.

  2. Gender Socialisation

    However, that condition or requirement has the effect that it disadvantages a larger amount of one sex than the other. Again proof lies with the applicant. The law applies the idea of equality in the work arena but must also do so in other areas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work