• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the differing reactions of people in Britain to the policy of Evacuating children during the Second World War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the differing reactions of people in Britain to the policy of Evacuating children during the Second World War. In 1939 just before the outbreak of the Second World War the British government decided to evacuate school children, expectant women, and teachers, mothers with small children, disabled, the elderly and the sick from major towns and cities to the designated reception areas. This policy of evacuation had a big impact on people, reaction and change in morale on all the above people mentioned and other people not being evacuated such as fathers, the host families and the government. In this essay I will be looking at the different reactions of all the evacuees and even people who were not being evacuated such as the men. In this essay I will also be discussing how the different reactions of working and middle class evacuees differed and why they differed. One of the main groups of people evacuation had an affect on was schoolchildren. It was feared that many child casualties would affect parents' morale, so pressure was put on parents to send their children away to the safety of the countryside. To do this, posters and leaflets were issued from the government to inform civilians of the plans of evacuation as one is illustrated below: The children themselves had differing reactions to each other this is partially due to their social class. Some children were from middle class families while most were from working class families. In this paragraph I will be concentrating on how this difference in class affected the children's reaction towards evacuation and how they were different to each other. I will do this by looking at different sources where children from middle class and working class families look back at their reactions and feelings towards evacuation. ...read more.

Middle

Some middle class liked the experience because the same luxuries were made available to them in the country. The middle class evacuees found the working class evacuees very dirty which was a shock to them. So I finally conclude that the working class children that were evacuated had different experiences to the middle class children that were evacuated. Many children were confused and upset while some were happy and excited. Parents were also another big group affected by evacuation. Working class women played a very important role in the war as the government were relying on them to work in factories making weapons and munitions for the war. The women would have taken the men's jobs while the men went to fight in the war. Some mothers who had small children were evacuated with their children but working class mothers were left to work in towns and cities making weapons and munitions for the war, while just their children were evacuated. Mothers who were not being evacuated would not feel happy having to leave their children but would feel happy knowing their children were safe therefore there morale would be high. On the actual day of evacuation when the mothers had to say goodbye to their children many mothers were upset at parting with their children "...many were upset at parting with their children-many were crying and hugging their children". They would have been hugging their children because they probably wouldn't see them for a long time. Other mothers stayed calm as having their children evacuated would make her feel happy knowing her children were going to be safe from a German attack. Pregnant women were another group that were evacuated. ...read more.

Conclusion

The hosts were more kind to the middle class evacuees because the host and the middle class were from the same class so they would have had plenty of things in common. I finally conclude that evacuation experiences varied widely. The main reason for the differing reaction was due to the evacuees coming from different classes and ways of life. The two different classes were working class and middle class. Working class people found it was a happy experience that would change there way of life forever. On the other hand many working classes found it was an unhappy and stressful experience. However to others it was an experience that, at worst, would scar some children into adulthood. The main differing reaction was due to two very different groups of people being bought together, such as working class evacuees, middle class evacuees, host families and many more, and these different people experienced different things from there new environment and people who were new to them and the new way of life. Most middle class evacuees were used to that way of life but working class evacuees were not because they came from the city which was a very different way of life. Evacuation bought together two different types of social classes who met and shared there different ways of life, this had a big impact on all the evacuees feeling. It must be remembered that evacuation did save countless lives and was necessary to protect the vulnerable and to maintain a high morale amongst the British people so the war could be won. Evacuation caused lots of small problems but the government believed that evacuation outweighed the problems that it caused. By Asim Bhatti Asim Bhatti Page 1 of 6 History coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. What effects did World War One have on social classes?

    (Unit 7-10 page 98). The aristocrats. The reasons behind this group in society being the worst hit by the war has a lot to do with it being the smallest group in numbers. I have often heard that in this country 10% of the population own 90% of the wealth, behind wealth power inevitably follows.

  2. Theory and Practice of Work with Young People

    Am I concerned with oppression and anti-oppressive practice? Much of what I and Nightstop as an agency do in our work involves enabling young people to live within a system that is discriminatory, unfair and biased towards a particular form of family ideology that suggests that young people should remain

  1. Outline some of the Background to the present role of home care workers within ...

    (Topic 13, p 7) Freud suggested that there are three elements, the Id the Ego and the Superego, which makes up the structure of the personality. Freud explained that the ID is the most primitive part of the mind, which holds the basic biological drive of life.

  2. Long term relationship with the people of Britain Asians- The first Asians coming in ...

    wary, now there treated equally and a key part in Britain's society. Caribbean- At first they were liked because they made a good difference to the country, they brought new ideas and a different style of life. Then as more Caribbean's came over to Britain the people who already lived in Britain became wary and they isolated them.

  1. Town and Country in Locorotondo

    Another adaptive strategy is that the younger Artisan takes up new trades rather than apprentice to the older ones. Galt's informants in Chapter 6, were the older population tell him of the loss of intrinsic values, such as work and the knowledge of sacrifice due to too much money (page 80)

  2. Social Policy work Experience

    It is an organisation, which enables students to help others. The project I am participating in is based in a school in a deprived area of Sheffield and involves helping pupils aged between eleven and fifteen produce a school play.

  1. Social Security Policy.

    balance between them and the responsibility of the state can differ over time and between countries. The aims of Social Security policy are not merely to be measured in income terms. Social and political participation may be seen as important civic virtues by a broad spectrum of political opinion.

  2. Social security policy.

    The liberal regime advocates residualism, laissez-faire, individualism and a severe stand on poverty. These are all dominant subjects in USA debates on welfare, yet the USA does not have a unified welfare system. The predominant measures of federal provision came in the 1930's from the Roosevelt administration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work