Explore conflicting accounts of Jewish Identity in

Authors Avatar

Explore conflicting accounts of Jewish Identity in “The Mandlebaum Gate”.

The Mandlebaum Gate is a novel by Muriel Spark set in the territories of Jerusalem and Jordan during the Eichmann Trials.  Within the novel there is a character “Barbara Vaughan” who is a Gentile Jewess.  She travels within Israel and Jordan on a pilgrimage to see the holy shrines and has various adventures and encounters during her trip.  It is clear from the first few pages of the novel that Jewish identity is a key theme and continues to be as such throughout.

The first chapter “Freddy’s Walk” immediately helps to set the scene as we see him travelling through the “amazing alleys of the Orthodox Quarter of Israel’s Jerusalem” During this chapter Freddy collides with a small boy whose mother immediately  reacts by scolding the child, “evidently trying to impress upon him the undesirable nature of Freddy”.  Freddy believes that the mother reacts in this way because she presumes him to be “a modern Jew, one of the regular Israelis of whom this sect disapproved perhaps more heavily than they did of the honest unclean foreigner”  Freddy goes on to consider “Why couldn’t people be moderate?” in the way they behave towards one another and accept differences rather than persecuting against them.  This immediately illustrates the attitudes that a Jew could encounter at this stage in Israel due to lack of public acceptance and conflict within the territory.  A little later in this chapter Freddy meets with Barbara Vaughan and they discuss the beliefs of Jews, Freddy states “Most of the Jews here are unbelievers as far as I can gather” to which Barbara curtly replies, “being a Jew isn’t something they consider in their minds, weigh up and give assent to as one does in the Western Christian tradition.  Being a Jew is inherent”.  Freddy, a little taken aback by this outburst is ashamed by his own ignorance when Barbara, who he had previously considered to be a “pleasant English spinster” states, “As a half-Jew myself, I think I understand”.  As soon as Barbara reveals her identity Freddy immediately begins to take note of “the Jewishness of her appearance, something dark and intense beyond her actual shape and colouring”  and seems to feel uncomfortable with her until he is able to share “an English giggle” with her about the wine served in Jerusalem, which is always lukewarm.  This reaction to Judaism by Freddy suggests it is something to be ashamed of or uncomfortable with, although as the novel progresses it seems as though Freddy is more at ease with Jews.  It has been suggested that the inclusion of seemingly straightforward characters such as Freddy Hamilton, who act against there typical stereotypes is a device to “maintain a sense of disruption”.  This disruption heightens the sense of conflict which radiates from Barbara Vaughan's tumultuous, confused identity.

The second chapter of “The Mandlebaum Gate” is titled “Barbara Vaughan’s Identity”.  Within this we are introduced to Barbara’s inner quandary which centres on her origins and how they position her in the world, the “split identity of Barbara Vaughan reverberates throughout the novel”.  Whilst travelling within Jerusalem she is constantly questioned about her Judaism.  When asked about her origins Barbara states that she is “A half-Jew”.  This is met with anger by many of the Israelis who state that she is not a half-Jew at all due to the fact that Jewishness is passed down through the mothers lineage and as it was her mother who was Jewish she is in fact “a whole Jew”.  Barbara’s lack of willingness to define herself as a Jew is met with further hostility when it is discovered that she has converted to Catholicism, she is asked “Why have you made yourself a Catholic to deny your Jewish blood?”  These questions lead to Barbara becoming uncertain and “displaced” within herself, “she felt her personal identity beginning to escape like smoke from among her bones” and she gives in to the questioning “with the resigned dying-fall of a victim deprived of fresh air and civil rights”.  The imagery and language used within this section of the novel gives the impression that Barbara associates her Jewishness with being a victim, like the Jews persecuted within the Holocaust she too feels as though she is being put on trial whilst the people around her try to categorise her.  However with a renewed strength Barbara states “I am who I am” and decides that she does not have to provide a definition of herself in order to satisfy the man questioning her. By doing so she therefore transcends categorisation, defiantly thinking that “Mystery was acceptable to her”.  It seems that Barbara is uncertain as to how to categorise herself due to all the different opinions which have been pressed upon her by external influences, one of the strongest of these influences being her family.

Join now!

The Gentile side of Barbara’s family seem to find it very difficult to accept her Jewish lineage; constantly suggesting to her that she will be more “comfy” if she stays with them.  They ignore and belittle her Jewish ancestry stating “No one could possibly blame you for skipping it.  After all, you don’t look as if you had a drop of Jewish blood”.  Her Grandmother speaks to her with approbation for her suffering in having to deal with her Jewish relatives exclaiming “Well I admire you for it”. Barbara, who cannot understand this dissent states “For what?” to which ...

This is a preview of the whole essay