• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Functionalism in the Social Sciences

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Functionalism in the Social Sciences Functionalism is the logic that everything has a use, or quite bluntly, a function. Just because something seems foreign or primitive, one mustn't just disregard it as just "something that culture does". The idea is very simple if looked upon shallowly, such as a knife is used to cut, but the deeper one dives into it the more complex it becomes. Functionalism has two meanings, or rather two different ways of looking at it. You can decide to concentrate on that everything MUST have a purpose or that it has a function but not a direct purpose, in the form of social organization. For example the North-American Indian "rain dance". Scientifically it doesn't actually cause nature to change and thus rain, but rather it brings the group together when they are all suffering as one in the "drought". ...read more.

Middle

The fathers or the basic concepts of functionalism are Bronislaw Malinowski (1884-1942) and Alfred R. Radcliffe-Brown (1881-1955). Although their views are different, they are still very much the same. Malinowski was a pioneer in the 20th century for participant observation, and spent two years studying the Trobriand and believed that to properly study a culture, one must spend the absolute minimum of one year living amongst the people, Learning the language is a very important tool which enabled him to learn more about the people, more so than if he remained just an observer. He concluded, while studying the Trobriand society that no matter how it may look to an outsider, all customs and traditions has its function and purpose. His ideas include how culture functioning also has roots in the basic drives, such as eating and reproduction. ...read more.

Conclusion

Radcliffe-Brown was regarded as one not well suited for ethnographic work and participant observation, but rather relied more on surveys. A reason for this could be that he was very reserved and quiet, or so go the opinions of him from his colleagues and students. His main aim was to formulate laws on how social behaviour crossed different cultures and his approach was what coined the phrase structural functionalism, where as Malinowski was considered just a functionalist. The main difference between the two is that Radcliffe-Brown concluded that it was impossible to study culture as it was too abstract but rather to focus on the social structure of a society. Studying the social structure is observing people in a society and determining things such as what social rank they have or what their job/function is and the relationship between all the people in the society. It is because of these two that functionalism has two real meanings, considering which side of the coin you look at. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The problems of knowledge as it applies to the natural and social sciences. Can ...

    For example, dating methods used in natural sciences; they cannot be verified and there fore we already have a problem of knowledge. When looking at social sciences it is also easy to find an example of a problem of knowledge.

  2. Main features of Functionalism.

    Social change is adaptive and evolutionary, even rapid social change has the tendency to leave the basic institutional framework intact. v) Social integration is achieved essentially through 'value consensus' i.e. a pervasive set of principles which legitimize the existing political, social and economic structure.

  1. Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport.

    Further factors that can form and shape society like gender, ethnicity, age, culture etc. are not taken into consideration and neglected. Hence the Marxist perspective focuses on 'having' versus 'not having', 'earning' versus 'not earning' and 'powerful' versus 'powerless'. As the Functionalist's view of society is based on value consensus,

  2. Epistemology of Social Sciences and International Relations.

    An analyst, in order to explain a situation in social sciences has to base it on the known factors that affected it. The problem here lies to the fact that not all the aspects of an issue are known for several reasons.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    These folks owned their own arms: this is key. In places like Egypt, Asia, India and China, irrigation was a big issue, and so kings' bureaucracies developed. The king and his staff required the compulsory service of the dependent classes; they in turn were dependent on that bureaucracy.

  2. Environmental Lessons From History.

    was non-existent. They were convinced that there was a better life awaiting them on the mainland. The morning papers on Saturday the 30th August 1930 reported the evacuation of the Island and according to the Government of the time it was because the Islanders wanted to leave.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work