• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gender-issues - which way forward

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Gender-issues - which way forward? The gender-issues debate has become so dominated by inflated hysteria and 'politically-correct' thinking (if that's the right word...) that it's difficult to get back to the real issues. The basic theme of equality is simple: "The needs, concerns, feelings and fears of women and of men are of exactly equal value and importance" Yet it's surprising how many people have enormous difficulty with that concept... Men;s descriptions of their experiences are exactly as true as women's accounts of similar situations: no more true, but also no less true - a point which many people would apparently prefer to be forgotten... Regrettably, much of the so-called 'feminist research' on gender-issues in general, and on domestic violence in particular, can only be described as ill-researched, ill-thought-through rubbish which suffers badly from circular reasoning and a psychological problem known as 'projection'. Probably the least-known - certainly the least-publicised - fact is that in almost every category, from infancy onwards, males suffer far more violence, from both sexes, far more seriously than females: yet it is only the protection of females - and adult females at that - which is promoted politically as a serious concern. Abuse of girls in childhood is rightly regarded as abnormal and wrong; yet abuse of boys is considered so normal, even so 'right', that an abusive mother may legally be classified as the victim of her infant son... Men's status, women's safety: they're both societal obsessions which work directly against any gender-equality in our society. Worse, most of the information used to promote the current 'politically correct' view of women's risk of 'assault by the patriarchy' is at best methodologically indefensible, often simply wrong, and on occasion even intentionally and knowingly false.[1] As a result of the flood of spurious pseudo-'facts' from this 'research', most public perceptions of the problems are completely wrong - as is invariably shown by any methodologically-sound study of genuine source-data, especially if data on both sexes (rather than solely on women) ...read more.

Middle

Yet, again, whilst enormous work has been done in the past few decades to counter the women's side of this stereotype, the male side has, if anything, been reinforced. There are constant demands that men should say what they feel - but are actively silenced or denigrated if they do. The Melbourne journalist Terry Lane commented that the instant response of his wife and daughter to his innocuous comment that he'd 'like to climb the Himalayas whilst he still had the knees to do it it' was "You don't feel that! You can't feel that! You shouldn't feel that! You have no right to feel that!" - the notion that he actually did feel that was simply not permitted to exist. Yet our feelings are our link into reality: if our feelings are constantly denied by others - if we are constantly told that we do not feel the feelings we actually experience - we slowly lose touch with reality, and may eventually go insane. In many ways, this is actually the so-called 'normal' experience of most males, especially in mother-dominated or mother-only households... yet our society 'blames the victim' in these cases because they are male... More disturbing is that many self-styled 'feminists' have argued, either implicitly or even explicitly, that women have an inalienable right to abuse males, on the assumption that men have no feelings, therefore cannot be hurt, therefore must accept whatever abuse any woman cares to dish out (for example, Dale Spender's oft-repeated exhortation to "insult at least three men a day, on principle, to keep them in their place"). The reality, as shown in a Australian national study, is that adult males experience at least as much psychiatric illness arising from abuse as women, and adolescent males at least twice as much psychiatric illness arising from abuse - yet support services are reserved almost exclusively for women, on the assumption that men's feelings simply do not matter... ...read more.

Conclusion

For details of the situation for women thirty years ago, see Erin Pizzey, Scream Quietly Or The Neighbours Will Hear; as Pizzey herself now argues, the situation was always much the same for both women and men, but whilst support for women has radically improved, that for men has radically worsened - a result, for the most part, of intense lobbying and intentional misinformation by self-styled 'women's organisations'. [back] 7. Again, Christina Hoff Sommers' Who Stole Feminism? provides detailed analysis of many examples. [back] Notes from visitors From: diane simard ([error: sidi544]) Date: 10-Oct-2003 gender issues l will get to you for the lucky there is no winners what you see is wwhat you get when you look please at least look with 2 wide open eyes and you will be surprise that women and children are getting miettes (french) of bread that is a good looking for the politically correct that is all now is there any solutions yes there are but the price is very very high and not politically correct and probably people around you won t like it you bet never never forget books contains half thruth (50%) l do have to get the rest which is my own conclusion and something l will live with like a blanket see you next comments l will get bak to you shorthly l do believe equally chance 50% for women 50% for men it is possible but many works From: I'm a guy, Date: 25-Oct-2003 and this article makes me uncomfortable I think feminist-sympathetic men need to be able to say what they think. Unfortunately, this piece is gratuitously hostile and bitter. Calling newspaper stories about women \"ludicrous\" looks like misogyny to me. The author needs to get his shit together. Let women figure out what \"feminism\" is. Men should claim some other term. I think \"egalitarianism\" is a pretty good word. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Mateship has long been a major aspect of the national image as projected by ...

    That resulted partly from government support (e.g. the Australia Film Development Corporation and the Australian Film Commission) and partly from the advent of the Australian cultural revival and the public's strong desire for self-representation on screen. According to Rattigan (1991, p7-8), the period between 1970 and 1982 saw two significant phases of development in Australian cinema since its renaissance.

  2. The cannabis debate

    Legalisation would reduce the enormous amount of money spent on enforcement and reduce the amount of police time spent on cautioning small time users, whilst at the same time increasing the country's revenue. This would enable police to spend more time and money on hard drugs and violent crimes and

  1. Gender Capital ? - Bourdieu and Gender Inequality

    Yet as gender is an 'asymmetrical category' (McCall, 1992:846) so society prioritises the masculine over the feminine habitus. This also affects those men that society deems 'feminine', such as gay men. For they too find themselves exhibiting a feminine gendered habitus and accordingly are treated as less than 'real men'.

  2. Pitted against Patriarchy

    Right, whether it be James Madden or the screen idol, Victor Mature, or linked with the machinations of that patriarchal institution, the Catholic Church. These hopes and desires, however, become unraveled as one by one they reject her. Even Father Quigley, the bully from the pulpit, has not enough interest

  1. Sociology – the Underclass

    According to their article, Gunnar Myrdal introduced the term in the early 1960's to 'describe those being marginalised and shut out of the labour market as a result of structural economic change.'11 It was first used in Britain to draw attention to the exclusion of immigrants from welfare.

  2. What do you understand by the term 'patriarchy'? Is the concept still relevant to ...

    This idea has been further developed by Walby (1990) who attempted to provide a definition of patriarchy which would apply to many people's day-to-day lives. She identified six structures within which sets of 'patriarchal practices' are carried out. These structures are namely; the mode of production, paid work, the state, male violence, sexuality and within cultural institutions.

  1. Who won their debate - Miliband or Poulantzas?

    "mass production", "the factory", "the corporation", or "the market").' [Archer, 2004] Methodological collectivism thus posits that parts function in association with other parts and that the properties of wholes therefore cannot be predicted on the basis of the parts alone, and that the actions of individuals cannot be understood without reference to external factors such social facts.

  2. Psychology - Gender identity issues.

    There, Katie and family saw a clinical social worker, a member of the multi-disciplinary team who agreed that she appeared to have a gender identity problem. During five visits, Katie, her sisters and parents talked about how they felt. Often Katie would sit on the floor playing with blocks or drawing as the rest of the family vented their views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work