• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Has the family became symmetrical?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Has the family became symmetrical? When we talk about family, we should think of the relationships and the roles between the individuals in families. Young and Wilmott's 'The symmetrical family' is the study based on middle class families in London, showed that families have become more equal and symmetrical with husbands and wives having an equal share of responsibilities in the home. They see the family as having passed through 3 stages to reach this: 1. The Pre-industrial families - the family is a unit of production, parents and children work as a team to provide shelter, food, clothing etc. in order to survive. Family unit mainly consisting of extended families. 2. Early Industrial families - this phase was seen as one of disruption, in which the family and household were torn apart by the effects of the industrial revolution. The father became more absent from the family and role of housewife and mother became more common for women. ...read more.

Middle

She found that although in middle class households there was a greater degree of equality, that generally women were responsible for household tasks, and that few marriages could realistically be described as egalitarian. Elston (1980) found that even in households where both partners were full-time doctors, women nevertheless did the great majority of the shopping and cooking, while men undertook most of the household repairs. Interestingly, in 71 per cent of these medical household it was the women who took time off work when their children were ill. Such findings led to a questioning of the assumption that conjugal roles were changing among the middle class, let alone the working class. Far from being a present reality, joint conjugal roles and the 'principle of stratified diffusion' were unlikely to be realized in the near future. One reason for Willmott and Young's optimism could be that their own ideas of joint roles did not mean equal roles. ...read more.

Conclusion

Obviously, these two different point of views point out their own views of whether nowadays families symmetrical or not. Young and Wilmott's 'The symmetrical family' points out that the Industrial Revolution does a great effect on families life nowadays, so that families have become more equal and symmetrical with husbands and wives having an equal share of responsibilities in the home. This theory was called 'optimistic view of an egalitarian' by Ann Oakley, who holds the different view of symmetrical families theory. Other facts also proved that the theory of Young and Wilmott's is a slight optimistic view. Although the symmetrical family theory is not the perfect point of view, it pointed out the influence of the Industrial Revolution in the family members, it has changed the roles and the relationships. Compare to families before, the conclusion could be like this, families have became symmetrical, but unsymmetrization still exists. ?? ?? ?? ?? Samuel Dai 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the claim that the family has become increasingly symmetrical

    4 star(s)

    In the main, these factors are inter-linked and go together to bring husband and wife closer and make the home a better place and housework easier which enables men to do more. Feminists reject the views of the 'march of progress' and Willmott and Young.

  2. The modern family is not symmetrical.

    The services a wife provides for her husband are not fixed or finite. A wife does not receive wages for her labour and she cannot change her husband in the way that workers can change their employers. These specific economic relations are the basis of what Delphy calls the 'domestic

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    For my secondary data, as I've stated, I used "Sociology Themes and Perspectives" by Haralambos and Holborn. A particular chapter in this book related to my first aim fully, the chapter was about the symmetrical family, Young and Willmott's theory about a symmetrical family.

  2. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    The second disadvantage is typical because I do not know the amount of confidence I can have in the usualness of the day recorded. Most people's lives follow regular patterns but if my diary period of ten days is untypical then my picture as the researcher will be distorted. EVIDENCE.

  1. Assess the view that the modern family is symmetrical

    Jane Millar (1991) emphasises that employment is not a guarantee against poverty for lone mothers. A survey carried out in 1989 found that 65% of lone mothers working 24 hours or more earned less than two thirds of median male hourly earnings (Bradshaw & Millar, 1991).

  2. Assess the claim that the family has become increasingly symmetrical

    participation in housework and only 25% participated in a high level of childcare. Also from her research she found that industrialisation lead to the segregation of family roles around the home. Mary Boulton also suggests that many surveys done exaggerate how much childcare is actually done by husbands.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work