• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have Social Democratic governments had to limit their ambitions to being mere managers of capitalism?

Extracts from this document...


Have Social Democratic governments had to limit their ambitions to being mere managers of capitalism? Before any political party could come to power as a 'social democratic' government the idea of social democracy had to be developed first. The unfolding of social democratic thought and doctrine that had to happen before the idea could be brought into government is an important pointer toward how these budding 'workers' parties' would act in any future position of rule. I will argue that the policies and practices of social democratic governments can be foreseen from their electoral tactics that were modified from their original purpose into one which would enable the party to be elected. I will also argue that once the history of social democracy in power began, it's various guises throughout western Europe could only hope to be mere interventionist, reformist managers of the capitalist world that they inherited. Firstly, what does social democracy mean? What policies did social democratic parties pursue? What electoral measures did they take to attempt to win the majority vote that would allow them to enter government? And what signs could we see at this stage that would give us an idea of the nature and role of any future social democratic ruling party? Briefly, social democracy developed due to a split in the socialist parties and their following. ...read more.


Thirdly, the acceptance and almost embracement of capitalist institutions such as the electoral process and the apparatus of the state. Lastly, but equally as important as the former points, was the fact that at the time of social democratic parties coming to power they were doing so in a western Europe that already was rooted and embedded in a capitalist structure of society. " Socialists had to govern in an essentially capitalist world." (Schumpeter 2000, p 364). All four of these factors point toward how social democratic rulers would rule. They all demonstrate a weakening of socialist ideals in the face of capitalism, through it's institutions, it's supporters, and the very fact that it was already cemented into the machinations of the economy, trade, markets and the social institutions and communities of western Europe. The means of pursuing power would be reflected in the ends of power. A reformist, interventionist party in opposition would be a reformist, interventionist party in government. The first time we can see this is in the coalition governments of Sweden and Norway of the 1930s. To be able to have a say in the governance of their respective countries, the social democratic parties had to deal and barter with their opponents in order to gain at least some footing in the ruling coalitions. Although this is not an example of outright, majority social democratic government, it reinforces the four pre-emptive factors of the nature this type of government would take. ...read more.


"The fundamental premise of social democracy is that nationalisation of the means of production is not necessary to overcome the irrationality of capitalism." (Przeworski 1992, p 132). Social democracy's apotheosis in the late 60s and early 70s still made no decisive change to the organisation of wealth and capital. For a political party to gain power through the ballot box it must win a majority of the vote. To do this, the majority of the electorate must be catered for in the policies of a party. In a society that is already predominately made up of capitalists, especially the more entrepreneurial middle-class, a victorious party will only be a reflection of this society. Thus, we see the eternal dilemma of social democracy - capitalism must be paid lip service to gain power in an already capitalist society. By doing this, the ends of social democracy change to ones of capitalist management, reform and intervention. In today's increasingly globalised economy social democratic governments can be seen as having to shift their policies and their practices even further toward a capitalist approach. As the seemingly only eternal principle of governments is to remain in power, all other principles become secondary. Throughout the history of social democracy capitalism has, at best, merely been diluted. From origins of socialism by revolution, through socialism by democracy, to reformist and interventionist governments, the future of social democracy can be predicted as one that finds itself forced to try and limit how far capitalism manages social democratic governments rather then the other way round. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays


    Sweden as a Social Democratic State (Epsing Anderson) provides social protection on an more equal basis compared to the UK, as it provides to citizens regardless of age, status and income, the state does not wait until their citizens have exhausted all means before intervention. As the key element on the provision of welfare services is universalistic, provided

  2. The Hidden Curriculum; Hegemony and Capitalism.

    In Ontario, it has been shown that, "Students are not streamed in any random way: rather, children of working-class, ethnic/racial minority and single parent families end up in the lower streams in highly disproportionate numbers," (Curtis, Livingstone & Smaller, 1992: 53). There are both explicit and implicit modes of streaming.

  1. Why, according to Lee Kuan Yew, are Western democratic systems unsuited to East Asia?

    The main, fundamental as Lee calls it, cultural reason why Western democratic systems are unsuited to East Asia is the difference between the place and status of the individual in those societies. The fundamental difference between Western concepts of society and government and East Asian concepts...is that Eastern societies believe that the individual exists in the context of his family.

  2. Does Boxing have a future?

    There are many benefits that herald from boxing and participation in the noble sport form. One benefit may be considered that boxing induces a fit and healthy society. The training undertaken by boxing participants increases their general level of fitness and health.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    specified spheres of competence involving a) sphere of obligations as marked out by a specialized division of labor, b) provision to incumbent of necessary authority to do his sphere of thangs, c) necessary means of compulsion clearly defined and their use subject to definite conditions. 3)

  2. Who Voted Nazi and Why?

    For it is quite likely that while people like Fritr Thyssen (industrialist involved with steel), Emil Kirdorft (Coal) and Otto Wolfe would be willing to help fund a popular far right party simply in order to weaken the left, but they may not have voted Nazi preferring their traditional DNVP.

  1. Environmental Lessons From History.

    Mutual distrust and lack of contact had made the Highlands more isolated and less receptive to external influences than the Lowlands, a process that accentuated the differences between the two areas. Rents were usually paid for in produce (Whittington & Whyte, 1983).

  2. Abolishing the Electoral College

    Since almost 3,500,000 votes were not even represented by this process in 2000, it is faulty. In history, the popular vote has been disregarded four times now in U.S. Elections, so we should stop the Electoral College process before the next election (Walbert par.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work