• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Durkheim in using the "Scientific method". In hindsight would you have conducted research on suicide in a different way?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was Durkheim in using the "Scientific method". In hindsight would you have conducted research on suicide in a different way? In this essay I will discuss some of the approaches to the study of suicide and its social causes described by Durkheim. I will then present a few alternative theories or critiques of Durkheim; and finally conclude with a Personal reflection on Durkheim`s analysis. Durkheim believed that society is a part of nature, and a science of society has to be based upon the same logical principles as those which obtain in natural science. Therefore Durkheim set out to prove that sociology was a science by applying his theory to the study of suicide. The study of suicide is seen as particularly important because it illustrates the wider theoretical and methodological debates in sociology. The study of suicide, by Durkheim was based on using statistics from several countries and looked for causes of suicide. This illustrates the positive approach. Later studies such as those by Atkinson and Douglas use interpretative and phenomenological approaches, which question the value of statistics and the idea of causes and try instead to understand how meanings are attached to actions. ...read more.


(O'Donnell, Page 315) Gibbs and Martin (1964) argued that, since Durkheim gave no clear definition of social integration, it was not possible to operationalise this idea. As an alternative, they proposed using the idea of 'status integration', in order to measure the extent to which an individual's different social statuses overlapped. The less the overlap between an individual's different statuses, the greater the likelihood of role conflict and, in this respect, there was less likelihood of support for an individual in times of social crisis/social dislocation. As an example of this idea, a man who has been married for a number of years before his wife suddenly dies is also confronted by a social crisis. His life may appear to lose it's meaning and the norms by which he has lived his life over a number of years suddenly become almost irrelevant and mundane. In this situation, such a person could be seen as being 'at risk' of committing suicide due to the anomic changes. For Gibbs and Martin, the greater the level of social support he is able to get from his other statuses in life he less he is to actually commit suicide. ...read more.


Some people do not want to die - they may be making a cry of help - while others gamble with their lives, taking a considerable risk but not knowing whether they mean to die or not (Taylor calls this 'Parasuicide'). The study of suicide then needs to be expanded to include risk taking, and understanding this requires looking at both meanings to individuals and the wider social structure. Taylor has also been associated with the argument that Durkheim's work, in seeing underlying forces guiding but not determining individual behaviour, is in fact more realist than positivist. The theoretical methodological issues raised by Durkheim's pioneering work remain unresolved. In conclusion, the research undertook by Durkheim was statistical and taken at face value he did not explore the reasons why suicide had taken place although he discussed some social factors his viewpoint may be seen to be bias. This view could be taken because Durkheim himself was a Catholic when he was discussing the role of values and morality within Catholicism as being superior. On the other hand Durkheim's approach has been useful in that other sociologists can learn from his methodology and the drawbacks in it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Choice of topic Theoretical Preference ?? Practical Considerations Research Method Theoretical Preference - If the researcher possesses positivist approach the aim will be to measure as objectivity as possible using quantitative measures e.g. structured social survey. If researcher takes int. approach the aim will be to study the subjective meanings which underpin individuals behaviour + to probe feelings/intentions - using qualitative techniques i.e.

  2. Evaluation of the difference between Positivist and Interpretivist methodologies

    To Popper the hypothesis that Marx put forward of a future world-wide Revolution of the Proletariat cannot be disproved just because it has not happened so far, as the original theory was not precise in giving a time frame for the event.

  1. The following essay will use the ideas of Durkheim to construct my social biography ...

    First, the internal society forms the 'collective moral conscious (Bilton, 1981). In other words, it is the defining mechanism in shaping our beliefs and attitudes for survival in the world. If society does not conform to the internal society, then social isolation, ridicule, and other forms of punishment could occur (.Bilton, 1981).

  2. In what way have contemporary philosophers and sociologists of science challenged the view that ...

    "scientific knowledge is nevertheless tentative and uncertain and influenced by numerous social and cultural factors" (Butt 2006 p38). Butt (2006) introduces the idea of a holistic science, which works along side religion, specifically the Muslim faith. The Islamic conception of man is that he is essentially 'a moral being and

  1. Should Sociology Be Scientific?

    to become working class, or being working class causes a person to commit crime. One problem with this part of the positivist scientific methodology is that some correlations found by researchers may just be by chance or indirect. This can happen where two social facts are found together but in actual fact don't have any direct connections to each other.

  2. Positivism: "Love, Order, Progress" - Auguste Comte (1795 - 1857) and Emile Durkheim (1858 ...

    There is no doubt that the nineteenth century in Europe was and was experienced as a particularly turbulent time, as turbulent and dramatic as the seventeenth century which had so unsettled and stimulated Thomas Hobbes. Very simply we can see two sorts of responses to these crises.

  1. Philosophies of Social Science.

    understanding of individual actions directed toward other people and guided by their expected behaviour' (Hayek, 1949, p.6). But we also find Hayek's ideas being taken up, directly and indirectly, by the Thatcher government in the 1980s and being used as part of a political programme.5 This connection between individualism as

  2. Scholarly detachment in scientific research.

    Therefore I agree with Becker and how he thinks the issue is "not whether we should take sides, since we inevitably will, but rather whose side we are on" (Becker 239). IF we were to as a group take a side then all sociological research would be known and understood as either influenced by other methods or simply knowledgeable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work