• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is religion a force for social change?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is religion a force for social change? There are two views on the issue of whether religion is a force for social change in society. Certain theories adopt the view that religion is more of a conservative force, maintaining the status quo. Other theories have taken the view that religion is a force for social change, bringing about revolutions in society. With all views, there remains the problem that there is no universal definition of religion. Marx's view for example, would be that religion would inhibit social change as it legitimises and justifies the status quo, where as this is usually contrasted with Weber, who suggests that religion can cause social change, in that it helped the development of capitalism. The functionalists and early Marxists are the theorists who claim that religion is a conservative force. The functionalists believe religion is a conservative force because they believe religion promotes a stable society, with no disruptions. Early Marxists, on the other hand, believe religion is a conservative force for different reasons, which are mainly that they believe the Bourgeoisie use religion to maintain their position of power in society, therefore keeping things as they are. Marx claimed that religion was an effective agent of social control, referring to religion as the "opiate of the masses", pumping perception-distorting drugs into the proletariat like a hypodermic needle. For him it was a mechanism of social control, it regulates the behaviour of the working class and prevents them from seeing their true situation. ...read more.

Middle

Durkheim viewed religion as being a major source of social integration - all religious activity has one main function - the celebration of the community. Religion is not about the worship of god, but of society. People are drawn together through religious activity and this helps to create a value consensus and a common belief system containing the collective morality of that society. Durkheim saw religion as being social cement, binding people together. Durkheim's conclusions are based on his analysis of aboriginal society. Durkheim said that in order to understand religion it is vital to recognize the difference between the sacred (spiritual/religious) and the profane (not religious/secular). He believed that sacred items are assigned their spirituality by society and are an embodiment of the core values which society strives to embrace. Like Comte, the founder of sociology, Durkheim believed that eventually society would secularise and religion would virtually disappear or be replaced by a new religion and other representations of society would take its place, like technology. Technology demonstrates values of enterprise, initiative, materialism, mass commercialism and so forth - things very valuable to society today. Durkheim saw religion as a positive force within society as it has essential and beneficial effects for society. In formulating his theory of religion, Durkheim thought it necessary to find evidence that could be used to support his views. He supported his theory by using secondary research on Aboriginals - research that someone else had already carried out. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1968 a conference of Bishops met in Medellin in Colombia, concerned with the general situation in Latin America. The Bishops recognized the temptation to resort to revolutionary violence. They did not believe violence would result in any permanent change. The term "Liberation Theology" became popular. Priests became active in joining movements to fight for injustice and oppression, becoming prepared to speak out. The Liberation Theology supports the idea that religion can be a force of social change and goes against the Marxist idea. Also in criticism of Marx is the fact that some religions are revolutionary like the Levellers and Puritans, also, supporting Liberation Theology, in Nazi Germany many priests spoke out against Hitler, likewise in South Africa Archbishop Desmond Tutu spoke out against apartheid. Also British Church leaders campaigned against inequalities in Capitalism during Thatcher's time as Prime Minister. The Church of England commissioned various reports to show what a poor condition the poor were in. In conclusion, according to Marxists and other perspectives coming from a structural perspective, religion does not promote, rather keeping society stable and encouraging the social structure. Weber and Nelson see religion as a promoting social change and undermining stability. They believe that religion can act as a catalyst for social change. However, religion can both encourage and inhibit social change, but it depends on the circumstances and of course the role of religion in society and how influential it is. Many may argue that religion is not as influential in today's society as it once was due to society becoming more secular, therefore is neither a force of social control, nor change. - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    The Orthodox Jewish Prayer places the role of a women firmly beside the role of a slave: "I was not a slave...I was not a woman" This is also seen within the Church of England and Catholic Church which contains many books written with sexist language, the ten commandments are even written addressing men as opposed to women.

  2. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    person, like myself, a little woman, and she worked during her childhood, younger than myself, in a factory." Aberdeen had spent 41 years working in the mill and had recently been sacked, therefore as a primary source it is biased as it is very personal but it is also dated

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    It inhibits change. Religion, as part of the superstructure legitimates the interests of the ruling class. Marxists refer to working of religion to support their case-the Case system is the best example. In Hindu societies, there is Caste system which has five levels or 'Castes' People are born into their Caste-status is ascribed.

  2. The Social Effects of the Industrial Revolution

    They will become accustomed to the isolation of family love, and will begin to "emancipate" themselves from their parents (Engels 144). Such dissolution of the family can only be attributed to the rise of the factory system because Engels insists that this problem was new to the Industrial Revolution.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    The individual was forced to follow the path of his own destiny decreed for him from eternity without help from others or from the Church -- complete elimination of salvation through the Church and the sacraments (which Lutheranism retained). This meant the elimination of magic from the world.

  2. The following essay will use the ideas of Durkheim to construct my social biography ...

    Durkheim believe that society consist of institutions that are required to perform functional pre-requisites that are necessary for society to function. Schools are one of these institutions, and contribute to society by educating children and providing them with necessary skills needed in working life later on.

  1. Defining religion.

    hold 'together' o Social life is impossible without those shared values & moral beliefs - without them there'd be no social control, solidarity or cooperation - there'd be no society o Unified moral code gains supernatural status therefore religion maintains social solidarity & religion is essentially a conservative force [Social

  2. The different theories of religion

    by preaching the importance of legitimacy of children and marriage. He however argues that this view is outdated. Religion according to him, has lost this vital function within modern capitalism, as the individual and property is less important to the maintenance of ruling class power, it has become depersonalised.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work