• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies. In Karl Marx's perspective, social class has a two-class system whereas Max Weber argued that social class has three dimensions of stratification: class, status and party. In this essay, I will explain and analyse why Weber carried out this theory that these three dimensions are distinct entities and cannot be resolved under the single concept of class. A "class" is any group of persons occupying the same class status. Unlike Marx's two-class system, Weber divided "class" into four categories: propertied upper class, propertyless intelligentsia (white-collar workers), the petty bourgeoisie, and the manual working class. A propertied class is placed at the top because they own economic power, social status and political influence. A propertyless intelligentsia is a professional class. It was placed next because they not only have relatively high social status and some political influence, but also have higher position in the labour market. and ownership of lesser forms of property than propertied class (e.g. stocks and shares). A petty bourgeoisie was placed third because they have less property ownership, less social status and less political influence (e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Since such status order existed, very strict rule of dividing people into different status groups is inevitable. Criteria for entry into a status group may take forms as sharing of kinship groups or certain levels of education. The most typical form of a status system with a high level of closure is a caste system. The caste system was so extreme that it completely excluded outsiders to enter the status group by restricting members marrying people from other status groups. Status distinctions are guaranteed not only by law and convention, but also by religious and races. The elite self-recruitment in modern Britain is also a type of social closure. E.g. Those children whose family has a higher status could attend public schools, they are also more likely to go to Oxbridge and be employed in higher positions such as judges, senior civil servants whereas children from lower status could not achieve. . Class and status groups can be differed in certain ways although their situations are closely linked. Economic ownership is not a always a factor of status qualification whereas it is a factor of class qualification. ...read more.

Conclusion

Considered those factors, he carried out the theory of three distinct aspects or dimensions: class, status and party. Class represents economic situation, status represents social honor and esteem, party represents social power. From the analysis above, it is obvious that these three dimensions are distinct entities, hence, cannot be classify into single concept of class, according to Marx. However, Weber's multi-dimensional approach to the concept of social stratification has its strengths (as I trust we have seen), but it also has some potential weaknesses. Weber's pluralistic approach to social stratification makes it very difficult to specify stratified social groups in society. The boundaries between various groups are almost impossible to specify and we tend to end-up with a stratification system that is highly fragmented, there is no way of knowing where this fragmentation could stop. E.g. Women are one status group, they having a great deal in common but considered in class terms, they man not have very much in common in terms of their life chances, experiences. A working class woman may only have the biological fact of her sex in common with an upper class woman. Therefore, in my opinion, neither Marx's and Weber's theory of social stratification has adequately reflected the distinction of social class. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social ...

    As Giddens (1997:244) writes "most of Marx's works were concerned with stratification and, above all, with social class". For Marx the key classes in the capitalist mode of production are the bourgeoisie (the class which owns and controls the means of production and property)

  2. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    On the other hand, Marx tended to explain both status differences and party organisations in terms of class. In contrast to Marx, Weber saw no evidence to support Marx's claim of the polarization of classes. He never rejected the idea that the number of bourgeoisie was falling due to the

  1. I will examine the social class theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber, and ...

    Stemming from these two major groups, Marx recognised the middle or intermediate class, which he termed the petty bourgeoisie. This class contributes to the capitalist surplus, by using their skills to administer and keep the capitalist system functioning effectively, but unlike the other two classes, is considered as a transitional class.

  2. Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

    An example of this at work would be the rise of the `Consumer Society' and the ideological shift in describing people as 'individual consumers' rather than 'collective produces' which breaks down any sense of class solidarity. This form of power according to Freire (1993, P:58)

  1. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    If anything, one might suspect that changes in wider society (the workplace, for example, and a general change in perceptions for male and female adult roles) are more likely to have contributed to a change in educational performance. In this respect, the argument here is that the secondary socialisation process

  2. Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

    These people are often seen as vulgar and having bad manners and so are not awarded a high status in society however Marx's theory they would be seen as upper class. The status theory can also be seen in other areas of society where people form groups striving for a

  1. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    He put forward the view that in market economies, people have similar positions because they receive similar economic rewards. However, he argued within the propertyless class, which Marx termed the proletariat, people have a variety of skills that they can market.

  2. SOCIAL INEQUALITIES- CASTE AND CLASS

    In Jayaraman's essay, we can see that they considers the idea of Sriniva, where he states that 'relations between castes are governed not only by the concepts of pollution and purity but also economic, political and numerical power" (4), the power of purity overrules and is the power, which in fact controls all aspects of society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work