• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

major theoretical perspectives on socil stratification

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Major theoretical perspectives on social stratification Marxists, Weberians and functionalists all have different theoretical perspectives on class and social stratification. This essay will establish and evaluate their major similarities and differences. It will discuss the main theories, their strengths and weaknesses, their usefulness and how true they are to today's society. Functionalists split class into a number of layers, based upon economic achievement such as occupation. So according to functionalists a company director would be of a higher class layer than that of a plumber. This is a good way to determine class as it is very simple and obvious, however not as good as many people believe, as do Weberists, there are a lot more factors to take into account. According to functionalists society is layered due to unequal rewards being given for different jobs. They believe that this layering is essential in society, as otherwise everybody would choose to do the easiest unskilled jobs and nobody would train for the more difficult ones, as the money is the same either way. ...read more.

Middle

This is relatively true to life as the business owners do tend to lead a completely different, separate life than that of the workers. However this is not so true to life, as Marxists believe that it is very difficult for somebody of the proletariat to change class as they have very little to give, other than their labour, which the bourgeoisie exploit. This is very different from the functionalist view which is that everybody as equal opportunity to succeed in life. Marx's view is more true to life as a lot of people do not have the money in the first place to pay for the training required if they are to succeed. However the functionalist view is also true as there is a lot of financial help and support available in today's society making succeeding more possible. Marx believed that capitalist society would eventually lead to a revolution resulting is a communist society. ...read more.

Conclusion

The functionalist view mentions that there are an unlimited number of levels in today's society; this can be seen as being true to life today as there are so many different people doing different things that could make them of a slightly higher or lower position then someone else. However with Marx's view there is no question about what class somebody would be in, it simply breaks class in two easy parts. Marx believed that in a communist society it would be fairer as everybody would be equal. However this view is not good as certain essential roles would not be filled. Social stratification is good as it allows various roles to be filled and also gives people something to aim for; functionalists believe everybody has an equal opportunity. However social stratification is not good as is causes inequality which may result in higher crime and social marginalization. Therefore functionalism is the most true to today's world. Paul Gilbert ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    The interplay of class, status and party in the formation of social groups is complex and variable and must be examined in an historical and cultural context.

  2. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    This system consist of five levels or castes namely the Brahmins ( priest at the highest caste), the Kshatriyas (rulers and warriors), the Vaisyas (merchants and traders), the Sundras (cultivators and menials), and the Outcaste (labour force). This system is one in which power and prestige rest in the hands

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    However, for Rex and Tomlinson, a small minority of ethnic individuals might possibly attain relative absorption and a larger amount, they surmised held assimilationist aspirations. (Rex, 1979, page 275/6) Ken Pryce's 1979, longitudinal study of "Hustlers and Slave Labour", from a social action perspective, is centred on the discrimination endured

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    ends, but involve disputes about the normative standards of value which lie in the domain of general cultural values. This conflict over general cultural values does not occur solely between 'class interests' but between general views on life and the universe as well (take that, Karl).

  1. Social Stratification.

    The un-employed, those in part time or unsecured jobs, older people, the sick and disabled, members of large families and single parent families are all particularly likely to be living in poverty. They are mainly poor because of their relationship to the labour market many are outside it altogether.

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    effects of an institution actively promotes and sustains an unequal position when compared to their white counterparts. There is some support for this position in "Introductory sociology" which states that the 1944 Education Act was designed to allow fair access to schooling for not only boys but also girls.

  1. Thin Layer Chromatography

    i. Using a ruler, calculate the distances each color traveled and determine your respective Rf values for the different colors. V. Data a. Our actual Chromatography strips. b. Rf Values i. Chlorophyll Colors Distance Traveled Rate of Flow (Solvent/Color) Solvent 6.8cm N/A Yellow 6.1cm .89 Orange 5.3cm .78 Dark Green 3.5cm .51 Green 3.3cm .49 Light Green 3.0cm .44 ii.

  2. Social stratification.

    This meant people from lower estates were legally obliged to do certain things for owners of higher estates for example work on their land at least one day per week. The feudal system had little or no social mobility, as it was very difficult for a person to move from one estate to another.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work