Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

major theoretical perspectives on socil stratification

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Major theoretical perspectives on social stratification Marxists, Weberians and functionalists all have different theoretical perspectives on class and social stratification. This essay will establish and evaluate their major similarities and differences. It will discuss the main theories, their strengths and weaknesses, their usefulness and how true they are to today's society. Functionalists split class into a number of layers, based upon economic achievement such as occupation. So according to functionalists a company director would be of a higher class layer than that of a plumber. This is a good way to determine class as it is very simple and obvious, however not as good as many people believe, as do Weberists, there are a lot more factors to take into account. According to functionalists society is layered due to unequal rewards being given for different jobs. They believe that this layering is essential in society, as otherwise everybody would choose to do the easiest unskilled jobs and nobody would train for the more difficult ones, as the money is the same either way.

Middle

This is relatively true to life as the business owners do tend to lead a completely different, separate life than that of the workers. However this is not so true to life, as Marxists believe that it is very difficult for somebody of the proletariat to change class as they have very little to give, other than their labour, which the bourgeoisie exploit. This is very different from the functionalist view which is that everybody as equal opportunity to succeed in life. Marx's view is more true to life as a lot of people do not have the money in the first place to pay for the training required if they are to succeed. However the functionalist view is also true as there is a lot of financial help and support available in today's society making succeeding more possible. Marx believed that capitalist society would eventually lead to a revolution resulting is a communist society.

Conclusion

The functionalist view mentions that there are an unlimited number of levels in today's society; this can be seen as being true to life today as there are so many different people doing different things that could make them of a slightly higher or lower position then someone else. However with Marx's view there is no question about what class somebody would be in, it simply breaks class in two easy parts. Marx believed that in a communist society it would be fairer as everybody would be equal. However this view is not good as certain essential roles would not be filled. Social stratification is good as it allows various roles to be filled and also gives people something to aim for; functionalists believe everybody has an equal opportunity. However social stratification is not good as is causes inequality which may result in higher crime and social marginalization. Therefore functionalism is the most true to today's world. Paul Gilbert

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related GCSE Sociology

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    Social stratification is not merely a matter of class. Two further aspects also shape it: status and party. These three overlapping elements of stratification produce a vast number of potential positions within society, rather than the more rigid bipolar model, which Marx projected. According to Weber, social divisions derive not only from control or lack of control of the

  2. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    The lower the stratum, the more population increases. Hence an illustration of a system of stratification can be represented by a pyramid or a triangle. The Indian caste system can be used as an example of a system of stratification.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    They are fundamentally different and irreconcilably opposed. The ethic of ultimate ends, formulated in religious terms, is: ''The Christian does rightly and leaves the results with the Lord.'' If an action of good intention leads to bad results, then, in the actor's eyes, not he, but the world, or the

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    (Haralambos, 2000, page 229) For Pryce, Hustlers are a subculture, which developed in response to the 'humiliating effect of racial discrimination', and the recognition that their initial hopes and aspirations before entering Britain, were merely built upon a deceptive perception.

  1. Thin Layer Chromatography

    i. Using a ruler, calculate the distances each color traveled and determine your respective Rf values for the different colors. V. Data a. Our actual Chromatography strips. b. Rf Values i. Chlorophyll Colors Distance Traveled Rate of Flow (Solvent/Color) Solvent 6.8cm N/A Yellow 6.1cm .89 Orange 5.3cm .78 Dark Green 3.5cm .51 Green 3.3cm .49 Light Green 3.0cm .44 ii.

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    effects of an institution actively promotes and sustains an unequal position when compared to their white counterparts. There is some support for this position in "Introductory sociology" which states that the 1944 Education Act was designed to allow fair access to schooling for not only boys but also girls.

  1. Social stratification.

    The feudal system of classification was mainly found in medieval Europe. "The levels of the social hierarchy were called estates and based on ownership of land"(Brown K 2000) People of higher estates had more legal rights and privileges than lower estates.

  2. Social Stratification.

    Crude death rates are calculated in the same way as the birth rates, the number of deaths per 1,000 of the population per year. 2) There are two types of poverty, absolute and relative. Absolute poverty refers to the lack of basic requirements needed to have a healthy life.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.