• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

major theoretical perspectives on socil stratification

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Major theoretical perspectives on social stratification Marxists, Weberians and functionalists all have different theoretical perspectives on class and social stratification. This essay will establish and evaluate their major similarities and differences. It will discuss the main theories, their strengths and weaknesses, their usefulness and how true they are to today's society. Functionalists split class into a number of layers, based upon economic achievement such as occupation. So according to functionalists a company director would be of a higher class layer than that of a plumber. This is a good way to determine class as it is very simple and obvious, however not as good as many people believe, as do Weberists, there are a lot more factors to take into account. According to functionalists society is layered due to unequal rewards being given for different jobs. They believe that this layering is essential in society, as otherwise everybody would choose to do the easiest unskilled jobs and nobody would train for the more difficult ones, as the money is the same either way. ...read more.

Middle

This is relatively true to life as the business owners do tend to lead a completely different, separate life than that of the workers. However this is not so true to life, as Marxists believe that it is very difficult for somebody of the proletariat to change class as they have very little to give, other than their labour, which the bourgeoisie exploit. This is very different from the functionalist view which is that everybody as equal opportunity to succeed in life. Marx's view is more true to life as a lot of people do not have the money in the first place to pay for the training required if they are to succeed. However the functionalist view is also true as there is a lot of financial help and support available in today's society making succeeding more possible. Marx believed that capitalist society would eventually lead to a revolution resulting is a communist society. ...read more.

Conclusion

The functionalist view mentions that there are an unlimited number of levels in today's society; this can be seen as being true to life today as there are so many different people doing different things that could make them of a slightly higher or lower position then someone else. However with Marx's view there is no question about what class somebody would be in, it simply breaks class in two easy parts. Marx believed that in a communist society it would be fairer as everybody would be equal. However this view is not good as certain essential roles would not be filled. Social stratification is good as it allows various roles to be filled and also gives people something to aim for; functionalists believe everybody has an equal opportunity. However social stratification is not good as is causes inequality which may result in higher crime and social marginalization. Therefore functionalism is the most true to today's world. Paul Gilbert ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    means of production, but from economic differences, which have nothing directly to do with property. Status in Weber's theory refers to differences between social groups in the social honour or prestige they are accorded by others. In traditional societies, status was often determined on the basis of first-hand knowledge of

  2. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    This system consist of five levels or castes namely the Brahmins ( priest at the highest caste), the Kshatriyas (rulers and warriors), the Vaisyas (merchants and traders), the Sundras (cultivators and menials), and the Outcaste (labour force). This system is one in which power and prestige rest in the hands

  1. Thin Layer Chromatography

    i. Using a ruler, calculate the distances each color traveled and determine your respective Rf values for the different colors. V. Data a. Our actual Chromatography strips. b. Rf Values i. Chlorophyll Colors Distance Traveled Rate of Flow (Solvent/Color) Solvent 6.8cm N/A Yellow 6.1cm .89 Orange 5.3cm .78 Dark Green 3.5cm .51 Green 3.3cm .49 Light Green 3.0cm .44 ii.

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    There were two reasons for widening access to education by the Government. 1. To encourage a fairer society. 2. This was linked to national prosperity and the recognition of a large untapped source of labour lay in the abilities of working class boys and girls.

  1. Social stratification.

    The feudal system of classification was mainly found in medieval Europe. "The levels of the social hierarchy were called estates and based on ownership of land"(Brown K 2000) People of higher estates had more legal rights and privileges than lower estates.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Mercantilism signifies the development of the state as a political power, this development is to be done directly by increasing the tax paying power of the population. However, mercantilism wasn't free market: the govt supported monopolies, gave colonial privileges, etc.

  1. Social Stratification.

    Crude death rates are calculated in the same way as the birth rates, the number of deaths per 1,000 of the population per year. 2) There are two types of poverty, absolute and relative. Absolute poverty refers to the lack of basic requirements needed to have a healthy life.

  2. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    -Size of one's organizational cohort and its relation to other cohorts significantly affects career outcomes. E.g. members of small cohorts experience enhances mobility prospects. IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY -Automation raises the average level of worker skill and increases the variance within firms, giving rise to skill-based career lines that reflect job idiosyncrasies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work