• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Marx, Durkhiem and Weber had a distinctive perception of the development of society from pre-modern to modernity, the problems

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Marx, Durkhiem and Weber had a distinctive perception of the development of society from pre-modern to modernity, the problems that would be faced and their predictions as to the future. Outline and evaluate these differing perspectives. 1,495 words. 1,521 inc. references. Sociological perspective has benefited from Marx, Durkhiem and Weber's theories, regarding human nature and the development of their societies. Each one had their differing characteristics. Marx saw class conflict and Capitalism central to his theory, whereas Durkhiem concentrated on Industrialism and the division of labour and Weber rationalization and bureaucracy. Marx had three major features in his analysis, mainly how goods and services are organized; the conflicts which arise and how it motivates change from one system to another. Although Auguste Comte established sociology and some of the original disciplines Emile Durkhiem is responsible for turning the subject into a more academic discipline. One of Durkhiems main principles was to consider 'facts as things' and his 'Organismic analogy' idea maintains that societies are like living organisms. He believed that the only way one can analyze the complete picture, is to look at all the parts and its contribution. ...read more.

Middle

The study also highlighted that one social group was more likely than another to commit suicide so the suicide rate was not a reliable answer. In his rules of sociological method he emphasized the importance of social facts by distinguishing between their causes and their social functions. He believed that "the study of any social fact's functions must be different from the study of its causes". Central to Durkhiems work is morality which also represents a 'social fact'; to understand how social order can be achieved Durkhiem assumes that morality helps to regulate societies. As morality is external to individuals as well as constraining it serves two purposes. Social order is threatened when individual's constantly demand more of everything; therefore it can never be satisfied. Morality helps to restrict these desires. He believed that social order, solidarity, and happiness could only be achieved if individuals adhered to the same shared morality, this was termed as the 'conscience collective'. In Durkhiems first work "The division of labour in society" he explains how societies have changed, from smaller communities where the population would have been largely the small illiterate type, to larger more complicated industrial types. ...read more.

Conclusion

The workers {Proletariat} do not own the means of production therefore are exploited by selling their labour power, and it is this situation which causes the most tensions and conflicts. Marx believed that the end of capitalism would come, because profit seeking would always be unstable, the division between rich and poor would produce too many tensions and a revolution would follow, which would lead to a classless society. Marx relied too much on historical events and put to much importance on external factors carving out people's destinies in a definite way; instead individuals have freedom of choice to alter their own destinies. The economic issues surrounding the superstructure of ideas and culture do not fully explain the modern cultural conflicts of gender, nationalism and ethnicity. The prediction of a more polarized division of class, central to Marx's theory has developed into a middle class emerging instead, with everyone enjoying a higher standard of living, with the acceptance of capitalism. Instead of a false ideology at work, society enjoys more civil liberties, material progress and stronger democracies than most other systems. Sociology in Focus. Paul Taylor et. al. Causeway Press Ltd. Pg 33-34. Pg 657-660. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Student number. 0465802/1 Assignment number. SOB 2019 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

    Weber though that class is the only basis for power, as he saw the higher classes as being superior and far more intellectual, therefore deserving of the power. Weber also had another view about how people formed groups which was much more in-depth than Marx's theory.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    The Q method = 1 of the main tools of measurement in positivism. Criticisms of Q's Those who adopt a positivist perspective often reject the entire procedure of operationalising concepts, selecting indicators, constructing Q's + quantifying the results. They argue that rather than providing a valid picture of the soc world, such research in fact distort soc reality.

  1. Response to Fritjof Capra's "The Turning Point"

    Perhaps in the seventies that worked, but now it does not. I would argue that the Newtonian/Cartesian worldview was always naturally heading towards a more holistic approach. Not so much because humans are intrinsically brilliant, but because science could divide the world up into smaller and smaller parts only so much before it stopped making sense - vis-�-vis genetics.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Parties ''Parties reside in the sphere of power'' (938). ''Parties are... only possible within groups that have an asssociational character, that is, some rational order and a staff of persons'' (938). Parties aim for social power, the ability to influence the actions of others, and thus may exist in a

  1. The development of Spartan society.

    council played a relatively inconspicuous part.'7 The democratic assembly or 'ekklesia' as Plutarch alludes to, was the 'major organ of the Spartan state (for) every full citizen over the age of thirty had the right to its membership.'8 Such allowances possibly broadened the scope and dynamics of political involvement within the Spartiate community.

  2. Evaluate the secularization thesis.

    would cease to rely on religious meanings and explanations and instead use rational explanations to understand their world. He believed this was an inevitable outcome of modernisation. Religion as Marx believed was an illusion that kept the working class in their place and maintained the power of the ruling class (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000).

  1. Marx, Weber and Durkheim have significantly advanced our understanding of industrial capitalist societies. ...

    In other words, he would explain that people's values, ambitions and ideas are related directly to their economic position, i.e. their function in capitalist society. Marx found that "conflict between economic groups is the major engine of change" (Macionis & Plummer, p.79).

  2. Free essay

    What was distinctive about gender roles in the nineteenth century?

    However, these gender distinctions relating to the nineteenth century home were only possible in a middle class ideal. In a working class environment, gender distinctions changed. Working class women in the late nineteenth century should have seen improvements to their lives as individuals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work