• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport.

Extracts from this document...


2 Sociological perspectives: Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport This essay will be about two different sociological perspectives. It will compare Marxism and Functionalism aswell as highlighting their benefits and problems. At the end of this essay there will be thoughts about the contribution of Marxism and Functionalism to sport. Both, Marxism and Functionalism are sets of ideas trying to provide an explanation for human society. But as both perspectives have different priorities they will not give a fulfilling answer to that explanation as it can be seen later on in the essay within the criticism of each. Marxism and Functionalism are both related to a structural view of sociology. That is according to Giddens (1996) observable patterns of behaviour within a society that shapes the individual. The structural view of society belongs to the macroperspective of sociology and therefore looks at the society as a whole within its large-scale principles like family, education, religion aswell as 'examining wider structures, interdependent social institutions and historical processes of social life' (Marshall, 1998 pp. 378-379). The structural view of society can be subdivided into two furthermore perspectives: the Consensus and the Conflict view. Marxism will represent the Conflict perspective of society, Functionalism the Consensus view. Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German social theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the politics, culture and economics of the newly emerging nations within Europe. ...read more.


Both perspectives, Marxist and Functionalist do not only have negative aspects but positive and beneficial ones as well, especially when applied to sport. Marxism tries to identify which sports are accessible to whom. Therefore participation rates will be examined. A recent example: in contemporary British society class differences regarding participation rates in different sports can be found. The higher the social class, the more likely the individual is to be more active and to attend a sports event. The explanation therefore: a lack of resources in finances and availability of those in the working class. Affected sports are walking, jogging, swimming, weight-lifting, snooker, and soccer. (Abercrombie et al, 2000). Even though not listed in that research, those sports traditionally considered to be upper class like polo, golf and equitation should be regarded too, as the equipment and availability for the working class is again limited due to lack of resources, especially financial resources. Furthermore a Marxist focuses on the distribution of power in sport: Who has got the power and why? Inequality can again be identified. Sport is determined and shaped by the economic system in the hands of the powerful Bourgeoisie and does yet again promote the interest of those: increasing capital, maintaining power and privileges. Besides labour, sport is another tool of exploiting the working class as sport is just another form of controlling the society through a form of popular entertainment respectively giving access to certain sports only to certain, volitional members. ...read more.


sport, and therefore focuses on conflict caused primarily by money. Functionalism in contrast 'stresses the extent to which the different parts fit together harmoniously'' (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000 p.1032). Marxism seems to be a social utopia as a society without exploitation is not realistic whereas Functionalism is a too positive way to describe society, neglecting individual's needs and further influencing factors. Sport can obviously not only be seen through a Marxist's or Functionalist's view but it will benefit if both views are put together to solve the negative aspects of each perspective, this could then form a theory to describe the society today. Reference list: GIDDENS, A. (2001) Sociology 4th ed. Cambridge. Polity Press. HARALAMBOS, M. and HOLBORN, M. (2000) Sociology Themes and Perspectives 5th ed. London. HarperCollins Publishers Limited. MARSHALL, G. (1998) Oxford Dictionary of Sociology 2nd ed. pp. 378-379 Oxford. Oxford University Press. ABERCROMBIE, N. et al (2000) The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology 4th ed. London. Penguin Books. ABERCROMBIE, N. et al (2000) Contemporary British Society 3rd ed. pp. 359-362 Cambridge. Polity Press. COAKLEY, J J. (1994) Sport in society-Issues and Controversies 5th ed. pp.27-51 Madison, Brown and Benchmark. KELSO, P. and HOPPS, D. (2003). January 11. England set to play in Zimbabwe The Guardian-Sport. P.14 SociologyOnline [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.sociologyonline.co.uk> [Accessed 12 January 2003] Sociological Theories [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.coe.unt.edu/kweiller/sociological_theories.htm> [Accessed 12 January 2003] <URL:http://www.longroad.ac.uk/accreditation_project/subject_sociology/booklets/class_identity.pdf > [Accessed 12 January 2003] Map of Sociological Theory [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.hewett.norfolk.sch.uk/curric/soc/Theory.htm> [Accessed 12 January 2003] Ben Johnson [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.infoplease.com/ipsa/A0109318.html> [Accessed 12 January 2003] 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

    4 star(s)

    grandparents, parents, and children. Additionally, Murdock felt that the family is an institution, which performs primary socialisation the teaching of norms and values to children initially by parents. By teaching norms and values to children, Murdock felt the family maintains social solidarity within society, hence improving society.

  2. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    There is also a clear link with talking about power, in that a range of social control measures were proposed, and many actually introduced, to exercise power and punishment over the groups. Cohen said these groups came about due to the youths rejecting the 'work ethic'.

  1. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    functional prerequisites. The natural balance develops through common values and also through different aspects of the society like family, education, religion, sport etc. (Coakley, 2004). So the family's contribution is to reproduce new members as well as socialising them, teaching them the values that are needed in society.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    and efficiency while, at the same time, consuming products of the economy and increasing the rate of demand. Thus they are all integrated on the basis of materialism. Ideas of materialism and production are explored further and in more depth by weberian theorists and more significantly in Marxist based theories.

  1. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    David Hargreaves, Stephen Hester and Frank Mellor argue that teachers make sense of and respond to a student in terms of the way in which they have typed them. Hargreaves et al distinguish three stages of typing. The first stage is said to be where the teacher will speculate about

  2. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    Things we are taught as children, that we go on to instil in our own children. Functionalists see conflict and disagreement as minor disturbances within society. They seem to be of the school of thought that sees that the different groups within society will always have minor disagreements, as we all have different interests and needs.

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Garfinkel asking students to go home and pretend to be lodgers. Comparative Method > Comparing similarities + differences between the societies -{allows analysis + allows soc. change over a long period. > Also known as the natural expt or "Quasi-expt" -{ less moral + ethical problems therefore less likely to affect the behaviour of those studied.

  2. Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxist Theories of the Role of Religion These Two ...

    man Marx's last point about religion was that it was a compensator and oppressed pain in the following ways. Religion promises life after death (makes life worth living), Those who don't complain will be awarded in afterlife, Rectifying injustice on earth and lastly offering hope of supernatural intervention to solve

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work