• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport.

Extracts from this document...


2 Sociological perspectives: Marxism and Functionalism and their contribution to sport This essay will be about two different sociological perspectives. It will compare Marxism and Functionalism aswell as highlighting their benefits and problems. At the end of this essay there will be thoughts about the contribution of Marxism and Functionalism to sport. Both, Marxism and Functionalism are sets of ideas trying to provide an explanation for human society. But as both perspectives have different priorities they will not give a fulfilling answer to that explanation as it can be seen later on in the essay within the criticism of each. Marxism and Functionalism are both related to a structural view of sociology. That is according to Giddens (1996) observable patterns of behaviour within a society that shapes the individual. The structural view of society belongs to the macroperspective of sociology and therefore looks at the society as a whole within its large-scale principles like family, education, religion aswell as 'examining wider structures, interdependent social institutions and historical processes of social life' (Marshall, 1998 pp. 378-379). The structural view of society can be subdivided into two furthermore perspectives: the Consensus and the Conflict view. Marxism will represent the Conflict perspective of society, Functionalism the Consensus view. Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German social theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the politics, culture and economics of the newly emerging nations within Europe. ...read more.


Both perspectives, Marxist and Functionalist do not only have negative aspects but positive and beneficial ones as well, especially when applied to sport. Marxism tries to identify which sports are accessible to whom. Therefore participation rates will be examined. A recent example: in contemporary British society class differences regarding participation rates in different sports can be found. The higher the social class, the more likely the individual is to be more active and to attend a sports event. The explanation therefore: a lack of resources in finances and availability of those in the working class. Affected sports are walking, jogging, swimming, weight-lifting, snooker, and soccer. (Abercrombie et al, 2000). Even though not listed in that research, those sports traditionally considered to be upper class like polo, golf and equitation should be regarded too, as the equipment and availability for the working class is again limited due to lack of resources, especially financial resources. Furthermore a Marxist focuses on the distribution of power in sport: Who has got the power and why? Inequality can again be identified. Sport is determined and shaped by the economic system in the hands of the powerful Bourgeoisie and does yet again promote the interest of those: increasing capital, maintaining power and privileges. Besides labour, sport is another tool of exploiting the working class as sport is just another form of controlling the society through a form of popular entertainment respectively giving access to certain sports only to certain, volitional members. ...read more.


sport, and therefore focuses on conflict caused primarily by money. Functionalism in contrast 'stresses the extent to which the different parts fit together harmoniously'' (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000 p.1032). Marxism seems to be a social utopia as a society without exploitation is not realistic whereas Functionalism is a too positive way to describe society, neglecting individual's needs and further influencing factors. Sport can obviously not only be seen through a Marxist's or Functionalist's view but it will benefit if both views are put together to solve the negative aspects of each perspective, this could then form a theory to describe the society today. Reference list: GIDDENS, A. (2001) Sociology 4th ed. Cambridge. Polity Press. HARALAMBOS, M. and HOLBORN, M. (2000) Sociology Themes and Perspectives 5th ed. London. HarperCollins Publishers Limited. MARSHALL, G. (1998) Oxford Dictionary of Sociology 2nd ed. pp. 378-379 Oxford. Oxford University Press. ABERCROMBIE, N. et al (2000) The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology 4th ed. London. Penguin Books. ABERCROMBIE, N. et al (2000) Contemporary British Society 3rd ed. pp. 359-362 Cambridge. Polity Press. COAKLEY, J J. (1994) Sport in society-Issues and Controversies 5th ed. pp.27-51 Madison, Brown and Benchmark. KELSO, P. and HOPPS, D. (2003). January 11. England set to play in Zimbabwe The Guardian-Sport. P.14 SociologyOnline [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.sociologyonline.co.uk> [Accessed 12 January 2003] Sociological Theories [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.coe.unt.edu/kweiller/sociological_theories.htm> [Accessed 12 January 2003] <URL:http://www.longroad.ac.uk/accreditation_project/subject_sociology/booklets/class_identity.pdf > [Accessed 12 January 2003] Map of Sociological Theory [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.hewett.norfolk.sch.uk/curric/soc/Theory.htm> [Accessed 12 January 2003] Ben Johnson [online]. Available at: <URL: http://www.infoplease.com/ipsa/A0109318.html> [Accessed 12 January 2003] 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    Delinquency is seen a 'collective solution to a structurally-imposed problem'. The problem here is how to cope with parts of society that look like they are out of individual control, especially the uneven allocation of wealth and power and a very low status in the labour market.

  2. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    functional prerequisites. The natural balance develops through common values and also through different aspects of the society like family, education, religion, sport etc. (Coakley, 2004). So the family's contribution is to reproduce new members as well as socialising them, teaching them the values that are needed in society.

  1. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    Social order requires a certain degree of co-operation to maintain the Status Quo. As most of our values and norms are gained by socialisation and social interaction within the different social groups, it can be assumed that our values are learned from peer groups.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    The interactionist theory looks at the interaction between students and teachers and also interaction amongst fellow peers. It looks at how these interactions may affect the performances of pupils in the educational system. Interactionist theory suggests that a teacher will type or categorise pupils as bright or troublesome, good or bad.

  1. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    [Haralambos & Holborn 6th ed.] The economy views productivity as its main goal, while the political system often legislates in favour of productivity and often concerns itself with improving material living standards and finally institutions, mainly the family and educational system, produce and teach the skills required to increase productivity

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Garfinkel asking students to go home and pretend to be lodgers. Comparative Method > Comparing similarities + differences between the societies -{allows analysis + allows soc. change over a long period. > Also known as the natural expt or "Quasi-expt" -{ less moral + ethical problems therefore less likely to affect the behaviour of those studied.

  1. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    such as the USA do, British judges still possess a number of important legislative powers. With the power of judicial review, they can scrutinise the actions of all public bodies to ensure that their decisions are legal, fair and reasonable.

  2. Compare and Contrast Functionalism and Marxist Theories of the Role of Religion These Two ...

    This makes social change seem impossible and not desirable. Religion also causes people t forget the reasons why there is so much unhappiness in the world. This prevents people trying to achieve happiness for themselves and for others. The third point is that religion justifies social class.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work