In order to investigate my aim, my fourth objective is to investigate if hiphop can be related to as a religion. ‘KRS-One’ a famous hiphop rapper in the 90’s claims himself a philosopher of hiphop, and says, “His philosophy is to establish health, love, awareness and wealth in the lives of all that claim hiphop as their ideology.” KRS-One launched the Temple of Hiphop Culture in 1998 as a hiphop preservation society. It involves a functioning political movement and educational centre with the hope that it will rise a generation of responsible hiphoppers. With about 25,000 members, KRS-One claimed that the temple will eventually have a school in New Jersey with a nine -tier curriculum of breaking, beat-boxing, graffiti art, Disc jockey, fashion, language and knowledge. The temple of hiphop declared hiphop its own religion because they believe hiphop is divine and it proves the existence of God. Other pioneers of hiphop music like ‘Kool-Herc’ believed that “Hiphop was God’s answer to the forgotten youth of the seventies when a lot of youth’s blacks, whites, and Latinos were left for dead and forgotten”.
Investigating why youths turn to hip-hop culture for identity (which is my fifth objective) is because hiphop could be seen as a culture from the wider society because the attitude and lyrics has become a universal, underground culture for youth resistance from the wider society around the globe. Sociologist such as Eisentadt emphasized that young people were seen as more likely to identify themselves with other young people and share common norms and attitudes with them. The concept of youth culture implies a group of people who share some of the norms and values of the wider culture but who are in some sense culturally distinctive. According to Khaled Sabsabi a rapper and a youth community worker believes that hiphop is increasing the music of Sydney’s (Australia) youth culture because “they turn to hiphop for an identity, a voice and a sense of justice.
According to Albert Cohen’s concept of “status frustration”, it can be link to why more youths get into the hiphop culture this is because they are unable to achieve status or recognition in terms of the values of the wider society. These youths turn to a delinquent sub-culture by hanging out with other youths. Cohen suggests, “The youths then will create their own sub-culture in which many of the norms of the wider society are reversed. Stealing, fighting, vandalism and rowdiness which may be condemned by the society at large become a way of earning status”.
However following many criticisms of Cohen’s theory, Matza and Sykes (1961) point out that “many delinquent show genuine remorse and may attempt to use what they call techniques of neutralisation to excuse what they have done”. These involves justification of delinquent behaviour in terms of the wider society for example, a Rastafarian may claim that he only smokes cannabis because of his religion.
The Centre for Contemporary Cultural studies (CCC) in the 1970’s argued that cultural features such as youth styles are manifestations of structural features of the society like the economic system and its associated class relations. They claim that working class youth sub-culture developed because it was working class who experienced most extreme problems and contradictions of growing up in a capitalist society.
The CCC made use of Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, which is the way which the ruling class secures the consent of the working class to its rule because the ruling class ideology are values are dominant. Gramsci argues that the ruling-class hegemony is never complete because there are always group who reject the ruling-class ideology. Hip-hop sub-culture could be identified as one of the groups that reject the ruling class ideology.
Following both arguments criticising Cohen’s theory, it explains that the hiphop culture is a form of resistance from the wider society that is dominated and ruled by the bourgeoisies. The people within the hiphop culture comes together and share similar view, similar dress code, language and style, these have helped them gain their restraint from the ruling class.
METHODOLOGY
The methodological approach I will be adopting will be giving out questionnaires using closed questions, which is a quantitative approach. As suggested, some sociologists have tried to adopt the methods of natural sciences. To achieve this, they advocated the use of quantitative methods. The earliest attempt to use such methods in Sociology is known as positivism. Positivists believed it is possible to classify the social world in an objective way. Using these classifications it was possible to count sets of observable social facts and so produce statistics. The systematic weighing of evidence is a superior form of knowledge compared with subjective speculations and scientific research can never be accused of “taking sides”. For example, Durkhiem collected data on social facts such as the suicide rate and the membership of different religions. I choose to use a quantitative approach because I am more likely to get reliable information from my respondents that will support my investigation that in some aspect “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”. Using quantitative approach, data’s are seen to be reliable because if other researchers use the same method of investigation on similar material, the same result will be produced and the research can be repeated and the result checked. Quantitative approach will enable me to carry out a statistical measure and the result can be expressed in numerical form, this can later be used as a form of statistics to compare or make a general statement that can be tested.
. I will be giving out close-ended questions in the view to obtain statistical data. Questionnaires may be administered in a number of ways but I will be giving out my questionnaires to a certain group of people that fits into a certain age group. I will select my sample using quota sampling; this will allow me to control variables without having a sampling frame. I have decided to use quota sampling because I will know how many respondents with particular characteristics to question so that the overall sample reflects the characteristics of the population as a whole. My sample will include male and female within the age group of 14 to 25, not minding their class, race or educational background. I will be giving out 100 questionnaires to anyone that I get in contact with and that falls within the age group of 14 to 25 hopefully this will include equal number of males and females. The use of this sample method will save me time and money since it reduces the number of individuals to be studied and it is possible to generalize from it.
Having selected a research method and a method of selecting my sample, I will carry out a pilot study before embarking upon the main research project. A pilot study is a small scale preliminary study conducted before the main research in order to improve the design of the research because it helps avoid time and money being wasted on an inadequately designed questionnaire. I gave out copies of my first draft of the questionnaires to 10 people. From their response, I find out that they find it difficult to answer some of the questions I designed. I have the opportunity now to redesign the questionnaire for easy understanding before I conduct my main research.
I have thought about using other sociological methods like observation, interviews would have been more appropriate to research that in some aspect “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”. Carrying out observation and interviews will provide me with well-detailed result that will support the quantitative method, however I have been limited to one sociological method and I decided to give out questionnaires because it the cheapest way to get information from respondents and it is quick. Also, I am more likely to get reliable information from my respondents that will support my research because my result can then be expressed in numerical form e.g. percentages, tables. Positivist sociologist will support the view that the collection of quantitative data is less prone than qualitative data to arise bias because of the subjective involvement or interpretation of the researcher.
My adopted approach might be disadvantaged because questionnaires according to interpretive sociologist see statistical data as inadequate for producing sociological explanations of human behaviour. Critics argue that despite the reliability of questionnaire data it lacks validity because it doesn’t provide a true picture of what is being studied. For my hypothesis to be valid, it must give a true measurement or description of what it claims to measure or describe. For example, statistics on church attendance may be reliable but they do not give a true picture of religious commitment. To phenomenologist, assumptions on which questionnaires are based are entirely false.
Evidence
My first aim when designing my questionnaire was to find if there was a correlation between gender and hiphop as a religion I found that:
- Out of 50 males, 26 of them reject the view that hiphop is a religion, 13 of them don’t know while 11 agreed to the view that hiphop should be a religion.
- Out of 50 females, 38 rejected the view that hiphop is a religion, 8 of them don’t know and only 4 agreed the view that hiphop is a religion. (See below)
Differences expressed in graph
My research proves that more males than females listen to hiphop music and would see hiphop as a religion. When asked why, most males suggested that hiphop is male dominated and it portrays issues that can be linked to male dominance in the society like sex, money, murder, drugs, and violence. All of this are associated with male rather than females and that is why more male get into hiphop than females. However in recent times, girls are getting in to sex, money more and there are more female hiphop artist in the industry and this might have an effect in the future. This can be linked to my fifth objective because it explains why youths might turn into hiphop
My second objective was to get the view of my respondents on how music influences people. In other to achieve this aim, I stated options of how people can be influenced like, fashion, language, religion, style and attitude so they could tick as many as possible. I found out that most people had the view that music can influence a person generally. Most of my respondents think music can influence a person in various ways most especially language, dress code and attitude.
The pie chart above shows that 25% of my respondents accept that music influences their style, 16% accept music influences their attitude, and 21% accepts it influences their language, 25% accepts music influences their fashion and dress code and only 3% accepts music influences their religion and beliefs. This can have a strong link on why people might listen to certain types of music and why they aspire to the music they listen to. This can be related to my fourth and fifth objectives in the rationale section.
My next objective was to find out if people will agree with the view that hiphop is a religion. When carrying out my pilot study this was the question my samples found really difficult to answer, so I decided to have a yes, no, don’t know options. The findings are as follows:
Finally I wanted to find out if people see hiphop as a form of entertainment or as a deeper religious significance. My finding proposes that more people see hiphop as a form entertainment rather than religious because it involved money and if it is to be religion money shouldn’t be the main priority. My findings can be expressed in the chart below.
Overall, my findings do not have a correlation with my aim that “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”. My findings reveals that youths don’t share the ideology that hiphop is a religion, however hiphop is seen as a form of entertainment that expresses what goes around in the society and it can be seen as a universal underground culture for youth resistance and a way of protest. This can explain why youth turn into hiphop for identity. This explains my fifth objective
EVALUATION
My main aim at the beginning of my research was to carry out my research that in some aspect “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”. Not only was my aim realistic but also of interest to me because of how my friends and family members have considered me to be under the influence of hiphop music and also because I believe that young people who listen to hiphop music are influenced by the music. In order to research my area of interest, I had to come up with a suitable aim. The first aim I came up with was “to find out the effect of music on youths”, I later realized that the aim doesn’t portray my area of interest then I had to come up with my recent aim that in some aspect “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”, I also had to come up with set of objectives to support aim.
Researching this topic I found difficult because there was hardly any secondary research on hiphop as a religion. I had to look into other aspects like religion, culture and music to draw a correlation that will be necessary to my aim. In my context pages, I have tried to get information from different sources like the Internet, which I found really helpful because I got some information about a hiphop artist known as KRS One having hiphop, as is own religion. Also I made good use of textbooks like Haralambos and A-Z Sociology coursework handbook to help with my methodology section. The textbooks were of great use to me because I was able to find theories like Functionalist view on religion and other theories. I decided to use the positivist approach to carry out my research because I found it to be the easiest and reliable method to achieve my result.
I decided to use a questionnaire because I thought it was going to be the easiest way and the cheapest to carry out a study. Also large amount data can be collected and it’s easy to quantify, collate and correlate results. It’s also helpful particularly to identify trends and make direct comparisons. The drawbacks are the choice of questions may reflect the conscious or unconscious bias of whoever wrote the question and because the researcher had not thought of it; predetermined/fixed questions may not include a vital point i.e. the kind of point, which would only be discovered by talking to people. Furthermore, fixed questions lack depth. They rarely explain the respondent’s motives and it’s difficult, if not impossible to write unambiguous questions. However I found out that this method wasn’t suitable to my investigation because I needed to get individual opinions about hiphop being a religion rather than generalising from my study. For my research to be accepted as valid and reliable, it is important to note that it would have been beneficial if I was able to carry out other methodological approaches like observation and interviews but I am allowed a specific methodological approach. Carrying out observation and interviews could provide me with well-detailed result that will support the positivist view. My adopted methodological approach might be disadvantaged because questionnaires according to interpretive sociologist see statistical data as inadequate for producing sociological explanations of human behaviour. Critics argue that despite the reliability of questionnaire data it lacks validity because it doesn’t provide a true picture of what is being studied. For my research to be valid, it must give a true measurement or description of what it claims to measure or describe.
Designing my questionnaire was the hardest task faced because I found it difficult to design questions that could be linked to my aim. I did design some questions but I had to carry out a pilot study to get the view of a few samples about the questions I asked. The result from the pilot study enabled me to redesign my questionnaire so it will be more suitable to my aim. The questionnaire however did not really have a direct link to my aim but I was able to link it up. I could have also use triangulation
Triangulation is the process whereby you research a topic using more than one method in the hope that the results will validate each other and will cancel out problems of methodological bias. By combining theories, methods, and experimental materials, sociologist can hope to overcome the weakness or essential bias and the problems that come from using a single method, single observer, and single theory or study.
To summarize my research and the results I have gathered, I decided to carry out my aim that in some aspects “Hiphop is a contemporary religion for youths”, which I came up with five objectives that will guide me through my research and enable me achieve a good result. My objectives can be seen in the rationale chapter. At the end of my research, my finding reveals that youths don’t share the ideology that hiphop is a religion, but they can see hiphop as a form of entertainment and a way of protesting.
If I am to carry out this research again, I intend to change my aim to “The negative effect of hiphop music on youths”. I will carry out my research by adopting an interactionist approach; I will make use of interviews because I will obtain first hand information from individual who will be telling me their own personal experience.
Bibliography
Textbooks
- In the culture society: By Angela Mc Kobbie
(Art, fashion and popular music)
- Culture and identity By David Abbot
-
Sociology themes and perspective By Haralambos and Holborn (fourth edition 1999)
- A-Z Sociology Coursework Handbook By Joan Garrod, Ann Clynch and Tony Lawson
-
Investigating culture and identity By Paul Taylor
Websites