On personal experience and social context.

Authors Avatar

On personal experience and social context.” WW. # 4.

By: Mebratu K. Gebru – 992640255.

Submitted to: Prof. Marilyn Legge and TA Jennifer Janzen-Ball.

Submitted on: Oct. 14/ 2003.

        As the saying goes: “no one is an island, entire of himself.” Since our coming to this world all of us have had interactions first with our families and then with our own society. Family, the first school, serves as a shaper of everyone’s moral sensibilities. Though intellectual influence is preserved for schools, they themselves have their own moral influence. “As our lives are irreducibly social,” (Birch and Rasmussen, 85) the interactions that we have among our society also contribute for the kind of personality that we are. Based on the assigned readings and the writer’s personal experience, this paper briefly deals with the place of moral issues in social life, the role of personal experience in responding to the moral issues of one’s own society, and the religious influences on public affairs.

        Every society has its own moral values and ethical perspectives, which are exclusively based on its traditions, for in general “ethics does not exist without tradition.” (FCTW, 376). Also moral issues exist amidst private and public engagement, institutional patterns and social configurations (Birch and Rasmussen, 85). In every society there is a moral standard that enables the members of the society to redress social evils like gambling, adultery, sexual assault etc. Based on the moral vision of the society norms are set up, and  so every member of that society is expected to comply with these norms. The transgressors of the norms would be labeled as “deviants.”  Of course in diverse societies people who have different moral values live together. In this case, as Cahill says, ethics develops strategies that should be mentioned among them (FCTW, 371).

Join now!

        The personal interactions that individuals keep with others have their own impact on their attitudes towards moral values. Hence, the interactions are consequential, as they may bring forth either good or ill results (Birch and Rasmussen, 91). For example, teenagers who lacked sound upbringing in their childhood and had had contacts with morally perverted individuals would be insolent, and could not contribute for the general good of their society. Also those who were morally and emotionally abused in their childhood cannot be good parents when they grow up, as they have not ever experienced the privilege of having good parents ...

This is a preview of the whole essay