• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and assess the differences and similarities between the Functionalist and Marxist views on how society works.

Extracts from this document...


Outline and assess the differences and similarities between the Functionalist and Marxist views on how society works. Sociology has been classified as the last in a long line of emerging scientific disciplines, which people have developed and explored in order to make sense of their world. Indeed Comte, who actually invented the term 'sociology', had originally called the subject 'social physics'. Sociology can also be seen as the most complex of all these disciplines, because it attempts to deal with such a broad and flexible subject - what Giddens summarizes as 'human social life, groups and societies.' Early theories such as the positivist approach of Comte, the Functionalist views of Emile Durkheim and the conflict perspectives of Karl Marx have each, in turn, attempted to offer a view of why human beings behave as they do, and how they fit together within societies. Each theoretical approach has to some extent been shaped or influenced by the approach of others and many sociological perspectives display marked similarities, or a range of differences that can be traced to a reaction against previously held ideas. It is inevitable, and also desirable that such a broad subject as sociology should give rise to a variety of approaches: it would be impossible and also fruitless to categorise the vast amount of social change that has occurred over centuries by attempting to apply a single theoretical approach. ...read more.


Functionalism views education, which becomes linked with the family, as maintaining social cohesion through what has been called 'secondary socialization' of children into the desirable set of values, norms and customs - i.e. a state of value consensus. Durkheim himself wrote extensively about education, calling the school environment a 'society in miniature' which introduces children to and prepares them for the adult world. On the other hand a Marxist perspective would take the view that this discounts the vast amount of conflict inherent within society, and that it is not a value consensus which is being reached, but a state of oppression and once again the perpetuation of the dominant ideology, where children learn their obedience to capitalism. Whereas Functionalism (structural consensus) is based on consensus, Marxism (structural conflict) is based on the notion of conflict. Marx defined conflict as 'the motor of history' and is quoted as saying 'All human history thus far is the history of class struggles.' Marx believed that what ultimately shaped society and in turn controlled the individual, was economic power, and that all other social institutions were influenced by it. Although Marx was discussing history in general (as we can see from his theory of the 'four stages') he referred particularly to modern times and the rise of industrial capitalism. The Industrial Revolution had generated massive and radical social change, and also the capacity for a great new economic power. ...read more.


Browne's comments that 'sociological perspectives centre on how much freedom...the individual has to control society' then the similarities emerge. Both the Functionalist and the Marxist perspectives place emphasis on society as something which influences an individual, as opposed to the interpretivist or social action perspective put forward by Max Weber (who himself was influenced by many of Marx's ideas even though he disagreed with them). It is a different view yet again from the symbolic interpretivist one, or from the post-modernist perspective which argues that society is fragmented and unstructured. The most important factor to bear in mind when examining similarities and differences between Functionalism and Marxism - or for that matter any set of social perspectives, is that similarities and differences will always naturally occur. Sociological perspectives can 'borrow' from each other or react against each other - for example, much of feminist sociology can be linked to marxism. Difference in opinion is inextricably linked to the human capacity for social change, and the need to explore and explain. What was applicable to the society which Marx was discussing might not necessarily be applicable to another type of society. Each different society should be examined objectively and from a basis of 'value freedom'. As Giddens writes, 'Societies can no longer be understood through the application of general theories.' A subject as diverse as sociology demands to be viewed from a whole range of perspectives, and should not be limited to the relatively narrow margins of the structuralist approach. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Religion has been used to justify oppression. For example on the sugar plantations in the West Indies during the eighteenth century, slaves had to become Christians. Finally religious belief is often strongest among the poor and oppressed. The Neo-Marxist idea of the role of religion in society varies somewhat from traditional Marxism.

  2. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    (Sociology in focus 5th Edition, 2000, page 53) The main question asked by Marxist sociologists is how we all can benefit equally and how can we get rid of the social inequalities present in our society. They differ form functionalists in the way that they see the difference.

  1. Evaluate Marxist and Functionalist Views of Religion.

    The functionalist view gives very little consideration to hostility between religious groups. Conflict between groups within the same religion is a recurring feature of world religions.

  2. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    are inter-related, they see that the laws are made in the interest of everyone within the society. A Marxist believes that there are two classes, the Bourgeoisie who are the ruling class and the Proletariat who are the working class.

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    Religion offers a compensator. Compensators are a type of IOU - if individuals act in a particular way, they will eventually be rewarded. In the absence of immediate rewards, people are likely to turn to compensators. Since religion answers universal questions and offers compensators that meet universal human needs, religion can neither disappear, nor seriously decline.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    With certain phenomena, other methods are inappropriate. E.g. community studies, it would be impossible to get the same quality of insights. * Useful for development of other sociologists. An e.g. of this is Paul Willis's study of a single school which produced a no# of hypothesis about the relationship between education + capitalist societies.

  1. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    come to fill particular positions on the basis of achievement instead of their ascribed characteristics. However, although achievement is more important in society, social class, gender and ethnicity are also important in the sense that the quality of a person's educational achievement can be related to their ascribed characteristics.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    For example a means of producing food and shelter or a system for socialising new members of society may be regarded as prerequisites, as without food and shelter members of society would not survive. Similarly without socialisation, whereby new members learn the culture, language and values of their society, social life would become impossible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work