• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and assess the differences and similarities between the Functionalist and Marxist views on how society works.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and assess the differences and similarities between the Functionalist and Marxist views on how society works. Sociology has been classified as the last in a long line of emerging scientific disciplines, which people have developed and explored in order to make sense of their world. Indeed Comte, who actually invented the term 'sociology', had originally called the subject 'social physics'. Sociology can also be seen as the most complex of all these disciplines, because it attempts to deal with such a broad and flexible subject - what Giddens summarizes as 'human social life, groups and societies.' Early theories such as the positivist approach of Comte, the Functionalist views of Emile Durkheim and the conflict perspectives of Karl Marx have each, in turn, attempted to offer a view of why human beings behave as they do, and how they fit together within societies. Each theoretical approach has to some extent been shaped or influenced by the approach of others and many sociological perspectives display marked similarities, or a range of differences that can be traced to a reaction against previously held ideas. It is inevitable, and also desirable that such a broad subject as sociology should give rise to a variety of approaches: it would be impossible and also fruitless to categorise the vast amount of social change that has occurred over centuries by attempting to apply a single theoretical approach. ...read more.

Middle

Functionalism views education, which becomes linked with the family, as maintaining social cohesion through what has been called 'secondary socialization' of children into the desirable set of values, norms and customs - i.e. a state of value consensus. Durkheim himself wrote extensively about education, calling the school environment a 'society in miniature' which introduces children to and prepares them for the adult world. On the other hand a Marxist perspective would take the view that this discounts the vast amount of conflict inherent within society, and that it is not a value consensus which is being reached, but a state of oppression and once again the perpetuation of the dominant ideology, where children learn their obedience to capitalism. Whereas Functionalism (structural consensus) is based on consensus, Marxism (structural conflict) is based on the notion of conflict. Marx defined conflict as 'the motor of history' and is quoted as saying 'All human history thus far is the history of class struggles.' Marx believed that what ultimately shaped society and in turn controlled the individual, was economic power, and that all other social institutions were influenced by it. Although Marx was discussing history in general (as we can see from his theory of the 'four stages') he referred particularly to modern times and the rise of industrial capitalism. The Industrial Revolution had generated massive and radical social change, and also the capacity for a great new economic power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Browne's comments that 'sociological perspectives centre on how much freedom...the individual has to control society' then the similarities emerge. Both the Functionalist and the Marxist perspectives place emphasis on society as something which influences an individual, as opposed to the interpretivist or social action perspective put forward by Max Weber (who himself was influenced by many of Marx's ideas even though he disagreed with them). It is a different view yet again from the symbolic interpretivist one, or from the post-modernist perspective which argues that society is fragmented and unstructured. The most important factor to bear in mind when examining similarities and differences between Functionalism and Marxism - or for that matter any set of social perspectives, is that similarities and differences will always naturally occur. Sociological perspectives can 'borrow' from each other or react against each other - for example, much of feminist sociology can be linked to marxism. Difference in opinion is inextricably linked to the human capacity for social change, and the need to explore and explain. What was applicable to the society which Marx was discussing might not necessarily be applicable to another type of society. Each different society should be examined objectively and from a basis of 'value freedom'. As Giddens writes, 'Societies can no longer be understood through the application of general theories.' A subject as diverse as sociology demands to be viewed from a whole range of perspectives, and should not be limited to the relatively narrow margins of the structuralist approach. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The differences and similarities between functionism, marxism, and social action theory.

    the political, legal and educational systems or superstructure. Marx claimed that the infrastructure largely shapes the superstructure. As opposed to functionalism, Marxism believes conflict is the character of society and that social order is imposed by the rich and powerful and not on the basis of society.

  2. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    (Sociology in focus 5th Edition, 2000, page 53) The main question asked by Marxist sociologists is how we all can benefit equally and how can we get rid of the social inequalities present in our society. They differ form functionalists in the way that they see the difference.

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Neo-Marxists do not necessarily see the role of religion as reflecting the interests of the ruling class. Neither do they see religion as always a form of false consciousness for the oppressed. Instead Neo-Marxists see religion as an authentic expression and tool of resistance against class based oppression.

  2. Evaluate Marxist and Functionalist Views of Religion.

    Functionalists look at religion in a very positive way. They see that religion gives meaning to life, and that it helps answer our questions about ourselves, and the world we live in. Religion also helps others make sense of their experiences. A criticism of the functionalist view is that it ignores dysfunctional views of life.

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    In Britain, religion plays a less central role, so it is less significant in justifying social change. 3. Social Location where an established church or other religious organisation plays a major role in political and economical life, there is considerable scope for religion to have an impact on social change.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    ethnographic research. N.B. all researchers see themselves as positivists/Interpretivists i.e. existence of realists/Structuration theorists. Similarly, there has been one ?ing trend to combine research methods or adoption "tool box" approach to topic under study --> this blurs the simplistic distinction between two methodologies.

  1. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    are inter-related, they see that the laws are made in the interest of everyone within the society. A Marxist believes that there are two classes, the Bourgeoisie who are the ruling class and the Proletariat who are the working class.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    Therefore it is argued that the economic system is functional in that it provides food and shelter, while one of the major functions of the family is primary socialisation. [Haralambos & Holborn 6th ed.] This is supported by both Talcott Parsons and George Peter Murdock in their independent studies; Family Socialisation and Interaction process (1955)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work