• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate the usefulness of adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology.

Extracts from this document...


David Rowley Outline and evaluate the usefulness of adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology First we need to now what science is: science is having a theory. And be collecting data through empirical means and being able to test it, while being objective. From that you would think that adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology would be useful, while anti-positivists would argue that it is useful, but impossible. Anti-positivists/ Interpretivists reject the scientific method and believe it is impossible to use it on human society because it is impossible to avoid using values. Scientific approaches are also used in natural sciences like chemistry, biology, and they use the hypothetico-deductive method, and so it was used by Comte and Durkheim because it was the fashion of the time, but they altered this because they realised humans can not be studied in laboratories. So Durkheim can up with the comparative method, which involved collecting secondary data and dismissing laboratory experiments. Early sociologists such as Comte and Durkheim believed sociology should be a science of society and a lot of modern theories are based on adopting a scientific approach to sociology, such as Durkheim demonstrated on his work on suicide. ...read more.


Which would suggest science is not a useful approach to sociology because science does not fundamentally prove anything, but just comes across important pieces of research. More evidence to show that adopting a scientific approach to sociology doesn't work is research by scientists such as Darwin, who ignored gaps in fossil evidence on evolution. Sir Cyril Burt who was the psychologist responsible for the idea that children can be selected at 11 for particular types of education- has been accused of falsifying his research. So the scientific approach can not even be objective so how can it be value free, and sociology needs objective and value free research if it going to make assumptions about society. Realists such as Bhasker and Sayer suggest that both natural and social science is possible. They believe that scientists have a job to uncover and explain they believe careful methodology is the answer. An alternative approach to sociology could be through the methodology, rather than using scientific approaches such as questionnaires. You could use the interpertivist approach of research such as observation, interviews. ...read more.


It is generally accepted that the values and subjectivity are an unavoidable part of the research process. Merely to choose a topic to study is to attach importance to it. But recognising the influence of subjectivity does not mean we must abandon objectivity. This remains an ideal which sociologists strive for in a variety of ways- either by adopting scientific procedures, by declaring one's own values, or treating the world as an alien might. Once published, however, any piece of sociological research becomes property of scrutiny for many years. So by adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology. We can get an alternative approach to the anti-positivist study of sociology, therefore positivists can collect empirical data that can easily be tested and concluded from. And these studies can easily be re-tested or manipulated in different ways to see how it affects the out-come, and are more reliable than non-scientific approaches. And so adopting a scientific approach to sociology can be useful. Although it can be heavily criticised for not being value free or objective, but as long as sociologist scientists strive towards being value free and being objective their work can not be ignored. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Functionalists see inequality as inevitable. Interactionists introduce values into their work through identifying a problem "worthy" of investigation. * Soc/ists can't escape their own experiences or their intellectual values. They have their own perception of "problems" + there causes + consequences, therefore values + ideology are involved at every point of research from choice of topic to interpretation of data.

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation in sociological research

    You find out what they do, not what they say they do and the ways in which they think and that it also allows the observers (anthropologists) to gain a good overview of how and why a society functions. You also find yourself taking up the sympathy and empathy of

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    This journal will pursue logical analysis of the content of ideals, while not ignoring how ideals motivate value-judgements. It will present social policy, i.e., the statement of ideals, in addition to social science, i.e., the analysis of facts. In non-scientific discussions of policy, it must be made clear where the

  2. Philosophies of Social Science.

    To try to prove his point, Durkheim took an apparently extreme case in the seemingly individual act par excellence - suicide. Suicide seems to be the act of a lonely, isolated individual, perhaps suffering from a personal mental illness. But can it be shown to be a social act, prompted by a person's membership of a wider society?

  1. How successful was Durkheim in using the "Scientific method". In hindsight would you have ...

    For example, Catholicism and strong family networks could explain the lower suicide rates in southern European countries. From this Durkheim suggested four types of social structure with different levels of integration leading to different rates and types of suicide. In egoistic structures, like modern western countries, integration is weak so

  2. Scholarly detachment in scientific research.

    Smith argues that the government controls all the diversity in society and there is not an in between (values etc..), except when it comes to woman where she herself states that "we have learned as woman in sociology, that the discipline has not been one that we could enter and occupy in the same terms as men" (Smith 382).

  1. Is sociology a science?

    Ideally data collection is rigorous and systematic. A sociologist strives for objectivity and to avoid value judgements. Interactionism rejects the idea that sociology is a science and discards the idea of a social system. . Interactionism starts with the idea that people interact in terms of symbols, the most important of which is language.

  2. Coursework prose study

    Her husband manages to scrape the money together to buy her a new dress and she manages to persuade an old well off school friend of hers to lend her some jewellery. She is the belle of the ball but in her haste to leave at the end she loses

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work