• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate the usefulness of adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Rowley Outline and evaluate the usefulness of adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology First we need to now what science is: science is having a theory. And be collecting data through empirical means and being able to test it, while being objective. From that you would think that adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology would be useful, while anti-positivists would argue that it is useful, but impossible. Anti-positivists/ Interpretivists reject the scientific method and believe it is impossible to use it on human society because it is impossible to avoid using values. Scientific approaches are also used in natural sciences like chemistry, biology, and they use the hypothetico-deductive method, and so it was used by Comte and Durkheim because it was the fashion of the time, but they altered this because they realised humans can not be studied in laboratories. So Durkheim can up with the comparative method, which involved collecting secondary data and dismissing laboratory experiments. Early sociologists such as Comte and Durkheim believed sociology should be a science of society and a lot of modern theories are based on adopting a scientific approach to sociology, such as Durkheim demonstrated on his work on suicide. ...read more.

Middle

Which would suggest science is not a useful approach to sociology because science does not fundamentally prove anything, but just comes across important pieces of research. More evidence to show that adopting a scientific approach to sociology doesn't work is research by scientists such as Darwin, who ignored gaps in fossil evidence on evolution. Sir Cyril Burt who was the psychologist responsible for the idea that children can be selected at 11 for particular types of education- has been accused of falsifying his research. So the scientific approach can not even be objective so how can it be value free, and sociology needs objective and value free research if it going to make assumptions about society. Realists such as Bhasker and Sayer suggest that both natural and social science is possible. They believe that scientists have a job to uncover and explain they believe careful methodology is the answer. An alternative approach to sociology could be through the methodology, rather than using scientific approaches such as questionnaires. You could use the interpertivist approach of research such as observation, interviews. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is generally accepted that the values and subjectivity are an unavoidable part of the research process. Merely to choose a topic to study is to attach importance to it. But recognising the influence of subjectivity does not mean we must abandon objectivity. This remains an ideal which sociologists strive for in a variety of ways- either by adopting scientific procedures, by declaring one's own values, or treating the world as an alien might. Once published, however, any piece of sociological research becomes property of scrutiny for many years. So by adopting a scientific approach to the study of sociology. We can get an alternative approach to the anti-positivist study of sociology, therefore positivists can collect empirical data that can easily be tested and concluded from. And these studies can easily be re-tested or manipulated in different ways to see how it affects the out-come, and are more reliable than non-scientific approaches. And so adopting a scientific approach to sociology can be useful. Although it can be heavily criticised for not being value free or objective, but as long as sociologist scientists strive towards being value free and being objective their work can not be ignored. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Is sociology a science?

    Douglas believed family and friends were likely to be reluctant to admit the possibility of suicide and will, if necessary, seek to cover it up. He also felt Durkheim could not treat all suicides as the same type of

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Functionalists see inequality as inevitable. Interactionists introduce values into their work through identifying a problem "worthy" of investigation. * Soc/ists can't escape their own experiences or their intellectual values. They have their own perception of "problems" + there causes + consequences, therefore values + ideology are involved at every point of research from choice of topic to interpretation of data.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    this may become charisma of office (eg, the Big Potato, the Pope himself). Routinization also takes the form of the appropriation of powers of control and economic advantages by the disciples. Again, it can be either traditional or legal, depending on whether or not legislation of some sort is involved.

  2. Coursework prose study

    To which her friend replies that the necklace was made of paste not diamonds and worth nothing more than 500 francs at most. I think Madame Loisel can be viewed as a strong willed woman because she was determined to rid herself of the debt and lost the few luxuries she had in her life in order to repay it.

  1. Should Sociology Be Scientific?

    Durkheim found that in his study of suicide there was a relationship between suicide and religions, (e.g. Protestantism and a high suicide rate). After correlations are found between social facts the researcher may believe that one social fact causes another to make a hypothesis, such as crime causes a person

  2. Philosophies of Social Science.

    a value and individualism as way of knowing is underlined as we turn now to look at the rise of sociology as a critique of individualism and liberal capitalist society. Sociology and the Critique of Individualism By the middle of the 19th century, certainly in Britain, the impact of the various strands of individualism was pervasive.

  1. Scholarly detachment in scientific research.

    Smith argues that the government controls all the diversity in society and there is not an in between (values etc..), except when it comes to woman where she herself states that "we have learned as woman in sociology, that the discipline has not been one that we could enter and occupy in the same terms as men" (Smith 382).

  2. Durkhiem is frequently referred to as a positivist, Webber as the founder of interpretative ...

    (Craib, Ian. Classical Social Theory. 1997:26) Max Weber, born in 1868 in Germany, was the son of a Lawyer and was brought up in a household where Religon played a major role in his life. After attending Heidelberg University, he completed his first "Sociological" work on "The Situation of Farm Workers in Germany".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work