• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline Marx's view of class in capitalist society, and explain what you see as the major problems with this approach?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline Marx's view of class in capitalist society, and explain what you see as the major problems with this approach? Marx analyzed class in relation to the ownership of capital and the means of production. He divided the population into those who owned property and those who were propertyless, the capitalist class and the proletariat. He recognised the existence of groups that did not fit this framework e.g. peasants but suggested that these were hangovers of the pre-capitalist economy that would vanish with the maturation of the capitalist system. Class was more than just a way of describing the economic position of different groups. Marx saw class as tangible collectivities and as real social forces with the capacity to change society. However criticism refers to social class as no longer being relevant to the understanding of modern societies. Jorgensen, (1997) suggests Marx saw the origins of a class society rooted in the change of agriculture. The earliest forms of society Marx refers to as a "primitive communism" where nobody owned property and the land belonged to everyone. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs", The Communist Manifesto, (1848). The beginnings of a class system occurred with the development of sophisticated agricultural techniques. The notion of communal land changed and property boundaries were marked. Some people became more powerful than others did by acquiring and controlling the land. From this an increasingly powerful few owned the land and property and the rest worked for them. ...read more.

Middle

Gidden's suggests that this view underlies the assumption that classes are mere inequalities in the distribution of income and that class conflict can be "alleviated or eliminated" by the introduction of measures which minimise the differences between incomes. According to Hughes et al, (1995), Marx retained his firm belief that class played a major role in the transformation of capitalism. In pre-capitalist production, producers would bring goods to the market, sell their goods for money and buy other goods to sustain themselves and their families. Money would not function as capital but be a means of exchanging commodities of equivalent values. However, Marx argued that in capitalist production, the general relationship between money and commodities differs. The capitalists use money to produce commodities and the commodities are then sold at a profit to produce more money. However, according to Hughes et al, (1995), capitalists are drawn into two fundamental conflicts, competition from other capitalists and unavoidable conflict with the workers. Craib (1997) suggests that Marx spoke little about social class but that when he did he referred to social groups as being classes, concentrating on only two social classes. The significance of social class is still debated. It is sometimes suggested that class has no relevance to everyday life in contemporary society and ethnicity, gender or other factors have replaced it. Craib, (1997), suggests that Marx's analyses of class and class structure is useful but recognizes a problem understanding why conflict does not occur as indicated from Marxist analysis. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Bradley, (1996), criticises Marx for his failure to perceive the growing social and economic significance of new middle class, instead Marx concentrates on the relationship between capital and labour. Overall Bradley notes that the Marxist theory is useful but that insufficient attention is paid to other social grouping for example the unemployed and that Marx does not take into account gender or race and ethnicity. Also Marx's notion of class struggle and social revolution has been rejected by Weberians. Weber believed that social revolution would be an unlikely outcome and if did occur would not improve ordinary citizens lives but add to bureaucracy and tyranny. Weber also didn't feel it was a simple matter of one class in conflict with another, but that it would be more complex, with conflicts occurring within classes as well as between them. The "post-industrial" and "postmodern" frameworks inspire new approaches to class and criticise the Marxist Class theory. Bell, (1974), suggests that technological change would lead to the upgrading of the occupational structure. A new technical and professional elite would emerge, replacing the propertied capitalist class. Bell, (1974), suggests the general prosperity would be brought by post-industrial change and would mean that remaining manual workers would experience better working conditions, an increased standard of living and enhanced leisure time. Bell contradicts Marx's theory of "proletarianization and revolution". Postmodernism offers a more flexible approach moving the analysis of class to a broader framework dealing with its relation to other aspects of inequality, gender, race and age. However it still has traces of the frameworks of industrialization and capitalism from which it evolved. It still remains "economistic" and prefers to use an occupational definition of class. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    share a similar lifestyle, live in the same neighbourhood, attend the same church or go to the same country club. Those that do not meet these types of criteria are excluded from the group even though they may be in the same income bracket as the members of the group.

  2. Social Class.

    Lack of access to women practitioners can be a deterrent to Asian women taking up an invitation for cervical cancer screening4. Local studies have shown that access to female practitioners is poorest in areas with high concentrations of Asian residents and that practices with a female doctor or nurse are

  1. Mateship has long been a major aspect of the national image as projected by ...

    That is because the scepticism about authority made for the bonding of mates and the support for them to become more imperative. On the other hand, there is an exception in such great social cohesion. What should not be omitted when celebrating the mateship of the gold diggers is the hostility towards the Chinese diggers.

  2. Are issues of Social Class still relevant in modern society?

    As all teachers know, the children who do the best work, are easiest to control and stimulate, make the best prefects, stay at school longest, take part in extra-curricula activities, finish school with the best qualifications and references and get into the best jobs, tend to come from the middle class..."

  1. Why is there unequal division of household labour in most of the society?

    In this sense, the proportion of man's contribution rises with the wife's employment is only due to her own household labour time falls rather than to his rise. This kind of "cutting back" or the kind of "role expansion" as mentioned above is not a real reappointment of household labour.

  2. Social Stratification – Ethnicity, Gender and Class

    True, in the last 20 years, there has been an explosion of female centred explanations to social inequality however these too have been from the white female perspective. Sociology has not yet developed or accepted a valued and coherent concept for colour.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Such a distribution is always unequal and necessarily involves power. ''Classes, status groups and parties are phenomena of the distribution of power within a community'' (927). Status groups makes up the social order, classes the economic order, and parties the legal/political order.

  2. Gender Capital ? - Bourdieu and Gender Inequality

    experiences well into the junior-high levels, are unisexual as far as their friendship patterns are concerned' (McCandless, 1973:807). The networks that we all build are heavily influenced by our gender, and this has implications for future prospects. A recent study of the effects of organisational sex composition on the promotion and hiring of managers (see Cohen, Broschak & Haveman, 1998)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work