• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the arguments and evidence for and against the functionalist's view of the relationship between industrialisation and family structures.

Extracts from this document...


Outline the arguments and evidence for and against the functionalist's view of the relationship between industrialisation and family structures. Industrialisation is the transformation of societies from being agricultural to industrial, which took place in the eighteen and nineteenth centuries. Functionalists have many views on the issues of industrialisation and family structures. One of the leading functionalists was Talcott Parsons. He expressed many views on these issues. He and many other functionalists believed that industrialisation led to greater geographical mobility and the loss of regular contact with extended kin. They also said that the larger and wider family network was no longer important nor required, as emotional and personal needs would now be met by the nuclear unit. ...read more.


All members of the family, whatever age or sex, would be involved in some aspect of work such that duty and obligation to the family and community were key values in the pre-industrial societies. However, although all members of the family were involved in working to maintain the health of the family, the infant mortality rate was high and there was a low life expectancy. The functionalist view maintains that the nuclear unit allows for a more mobile workforce to meet the needs of modern society. It was also said that such a unit encouraged achievement, whereas in pre-industrial society jobs were created through the existing family trade (primarily agriculture) rather than through educational achievement. ...read more.


Others also cast doubt on the assumption that the extended family was the norm in pre-industrial society. One such individual was Peter Laslett who used evidence relating to population, size, birth and death rates and household composition to argue that the pre-industrial family was in fact a nuclear one. Other theorists have also argued that no one family structure was dominant or that family structure was influenced by the class system. It has also been argued that the issue is not simply whether there is a nuclear family or extended family structure, because other factors are relevant, such as various support networks which surround the family group. In conclusion it would seem that the functionalist view of the relationship between industrialisation and family structure can be regarded as over-simplistic or, at the very least, one which is open to challenge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Marriage is no longer important. Evaluate the arguments for and against

    4 star(s)

    Many people will get married as they are less likely to separate, as it is not that easy to get divorced and to get divorced, although it is easy nowadays, you have to go through quite a long, complicated process.

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    The proportion of single parent families increased from 8% in 1971 to 17% in 1989. 15% wee lone mothers and 2% lone fathers. The change in the reasons why people marry: * Philippe Aries (1973) "suggests that before the rise of individualism under capitalism, marriage was usually a matter of

  1. "Assess Sociological Explanations for the Relationship between the Family and Industrialisation"

    Fletcher believes that family became a unit of consumption instead of production. Marxists agree with this stand, and also add that the idea of consumption is the way post-industrial/modern society motivates it's workers, by making them by frivolous items with their wages, earnt at dissatisfying and irrelevant occupations.

  2. Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family

    Thirdly Parson also argued that the new nuclear unit provided the husband and wife with very clever social roles. the husband was the 'breadwinner' and was responsible for the economic welfare of the family whilst the wife was primarily responsible for the socialisation of the children and the emotional care and support of family members.

  1. Assess the view that sociological arguments and evidence support functionalist views of the role ...

    He has also been criticised for overstating the collective conscience because some religions can go against society's values. Other Sociologists agree that religion helps reinforce social values but not that this means they are worshipping society his case is

  2. Examine a range of diverse family structures and functions in Britain today

    aunts, or cousins.'1 It is one of the fundamental factor which form the traditional family pattern in most countries around the world, it may last from the tribal days to possible forty years ago. As an extended family, the members are either living closely or have a frequent contact.

  1. 'Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family'

    He concluded that 10% of households in England (1564 - 1821) include kin beyond the nuclear family. He claims hoe the nuclear family households may have been a characteristic of much of North West Europe and Laslett argues that this may have been important factor encouraging the process of industrialisation.

  2. The human family is a group composed of a woman, her dependent children, and ...

    from other troop members, allowing them to give their infants the attention they require. Among humans, the sexual division of labor has been developed beyond that of other primates. Until the recent advent of synthetic infant formulas, human females have more often than not been occupied much of their adult lives with child rearing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work