• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

People might be equal in the sight of God but they are far from equal in society (Haralambos, pg 69, 1986)

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast how differing sociological theories approach the problem of inequality in western society. It is common belief that those within society who have the necessary skills and attributes to perform and produce will succeed. But this assumes that everyone within society is given the same opportunities. As Haralambos points out people might be equal in the sight of God but they are far from equal in society (Haralambos, pg 69, 1986). To describe inequalities sociologists speak of social stratification, the study of any systematic inequalities between groups of people, which arise as the unintended consequence of social processes and relationships (Marshall, pg 643, 1994) Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) and Max Weber (1864 - 1920) were two of the most influential sociologists and they each developed their own theories about why inequalities exist. This essay will compare and contrast the differences and similarities between the theories of Marx and Weber and examine each of their theories in detail. Inequalities exist in all types of human society. It is necessary to make a distinction between social inequality, which is the existence of socially created inequalities and social stratification, which is a particular form of social inequality (Haralambos & Holborn, pg 21, 1995) Marx developed the idea of class into the class struggle. This class struggle, argues Marx, constrains and shapes the lives of all individuals in a society. ...read more.


Weber, unlike Marx, explains other dimensions of stratification besides class. One based on life styles that may be quite different from class systems (e.g. particular occupations might have traditional status regardless of their levels of income or wealth). Status groups for Weber, may have sources outside class, people who work in the same place feel that they have much in common, for example, even if they belong to different classes (Haralambos and Holburn, pg 37, 1995,) However, Weber did regard capitalism as a class society with economic relations forming the basis of inequality. Weber believed that the primary cause of inequality in capitalism was market capacity, the skills brought to the labour market by the employee (Bilton, pg 53, 1987). A lot of emphasis is placed on life chances when evaluating the work of Weber, especially the large division in life chances between manual and non manual workers. Bilton argues that there a number of problems with Weber's theories. Weberian theory concentrates on occupations and neglects wealth as a crucial element in the class structure. (Bilton, pg 54, 1987) Weber defines class as a group of people who share a similar position in a market economy, they receive similar financial rewards and therefore have similar life chances in common. Individuals with sought after skills, or a good education would have a higher class position. ...read more.


Weber sees class, as did Marx, as being based in power and the distribution of power. To conclude, this essay shows that Marx and Weber's theory agree that the ownership of property and the value of labour are fundamental sources of stratification. Marx puts his emphasis on the ownership of property while Weber focuses on labour value, but while Marx reduces everything down to one fundamental model based on his own analysis of capitalism as exploitation, Weber's theories on class and stratification show that other dimensions of stratification strongly influence people's lives. Marx looked upon inequality as evil and something that should be replaced, whereas Weber took a more neutral view, taking into account the existence of inequality and attempting to understand what inequality is and the consequences of it. We can conclude that Marx and Weber can be considered to "agree to disagree" over the relative importance of the concepts of class, status and power. Whereas Weber defined social class as any group of people who share a similar position in an economic market, Marx concentrated on the ownership of production and property. Bilton asks if Marx's analysis can be applicable today (Bilton et.al, pg 46, 1987), but as he points out the working class in capitalist societies has seen a rise in the standard of living and working conditions, and the growth of the new middle class of managerial, professional and clerical workers appears to contradict Marx's view that divisions among those without wealth would disappear. Marx's ideas seem therefore to have been disproved by twentieth century developments. (Bilton.et. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    means of production, but from economic differences, which have nothing directly to do with property. Status in Weber's theory refers to differences between social groups in the social honour or prestige they are accorded by others. In traditional societies, status was often determined on the basis of first-hand knowledge of

  2. Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies.

    (Haralambos and Holborn, 2000) People from different status formed these groups but their incomes are more or less the same. Therefore, they belong to the same class. 'Homosexuals from different class backgrounds are involved in Gay Rights organizations and events such as the annual Gay Pride celebration in Britain'.

  1. Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social ...

    Therefore classes are the product of market relationships. According to Weber, class divisions arise from economic differences, which have nothing directly to do with property. Classes are not defined here as based on an individual's relationship to the production process but are defined by factors of occupation and income (Giddens, 1997:246).

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    is more likely to have influenced male / female social development than the primary socialisation process within the family. Many of us have been brought up to believe that there are certain jobs for men and certain jobs for women.

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    This is like the D.M. where people make a social reality to make sense out of an often-senseless interaction. Schutz (Phenomenology) and Garfinkel (Eth) are meaning the same thing when they refer to typifications + tacit meanings. With Phenomenology, people have a stock of knowledge about the world, objects and people.

  2. Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

    contradictions of dominance and exploitation of the poor by the rich that has brought change throughout history would end, simply because the wealth would be evenly distributed. Weber on the other hand believed that people were put into order of patterns of inferior and superior ranks.

  1. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    Therefore, Marx believed that class form the basis of stratification in society where class is determined by the relationship to the means of productions. The relationship between the major social classes is one of dependency and conflict. In capitalist societies, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat depend on each other.

  2. I will examine the social class theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber, and ...

    Marx considered it to be transitional as he believed that it would eventually be absorbed into both the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, as its function in society was not sufficiently different from the other classes for it to survive in the long term.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work