• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Perhaps the biggest cause of problems in the modern world is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Discuss this assertion.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Science, Technology & Society ESSAY TITLE: Perhaps the biggest cause of problems in the modern world is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Discuss this assertion. Since the beginning of human life, science and technology was, is and will be side by side with man and mankind. Even from the simplest discoveries that helped mankind, anyone could see that mankind depends so much on science and technology that these days are almost impossible to know a fold of life that has nothing to do with them. However in this relationship, as in all relationships and kinds of them, there are some advantages and disadvantages. One major disadvantage is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Mankind has been evolved so much that people do not know what to expect next. What will be the next great discovery or innovation of science and technology that will amaze us? However all these discoveries and innovations have a price which grows bigger day by day. The price is the constant remotion of the ordinary people from all these technologies, which is used by an 'elite' which can understand the functions of technology or they have the knowledge to use all these technologies. ...read more.

Middle

But political choices fail down to unravel how a larger political interest can be of any help to the implementation of scientific method. Science sometimes feels repressed because it cannot serve its own needs for knowledge and research. As a direct result science cannot fulfil its own needs and goals. For example political interests specify the whole production and where to use this production and for what reasons. Technology has just to cope with it and manage to carry out the instructions of the political realm. So science cannot keep pace with society because society represses it and furthermore they have different goals. Politics make riddle the political morphology, as they want to be in control and ready to preclude the changes that will happen. This kind of politics has as a result the less allowance for the catastrophic implications of the technology in various folds of human life. As a conclusion, politics and society count on technology and especially in their capability to manage the development of technology, for their survival. Politics interfere straightforward in the funding, organisation and priorities of science and technology, as the scientific knowledge is linked to the values and judgements of the politics. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up all of the above, science and technology is an inevitable part of the society and society is an evitable part of science and technology. They co-exist and confront each other, because they want something from each other. There is an exchange of resources and operations. However they both are necessary parts of their proper function. For example society may demand useful things that science cannot provide or can but they have no proper use in society's needs. On the other hand, science and technology can provide society rather useful innovations with applications at many aspects of life. Although both of them have different goals and demands from each other, the key for their successful co-existence is somewhere in the middle. So science and technology have to provide society with something useful and practical, under their field of research, and society has to stop to demand the results of the scientific research in a very limited time, because science has to be sure before giving something new to the society. In conclusion, society cannot keep pace with science and technology because of many different reasons. Each one of these reasons contributes to the alienation of society and science and technology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Sociology is not, cannot be, and should not be a science.

    can be made to perhaps gain an understanding further based on the 'truth'. The majority of science, excluding para-scientific research and knowledge, is objective and where one scientist can measure a variable, such as the boiling point of dimethyltryptamine, another scientist can do the same and attain the same measure.

  2. The development of Spartan society.

    society, therefore giving the Spartans the 'power to declare war against any country they might choose.'37 Sparta was defeated in 669 BC at the battle of Hysiai by the Argives, but perhaps in response to this humiliation the Spartans developed their militaristic state.

  1. How and why is surveillance used in cities? To what extent is surveillance a ...

    Due to this lack of formal guidelines, it is possible for one group, e.g. young black males, to be classed as more suspicious, and be targeted more than middle aged females. Policing the streets is a form of surveillance that dates back to the early 1800's, another form of a

  2. What are the points of conversion and the points of departure between science and ...

    In medicine, knowledge needs to be reliable, but there is a special problem which makes the reliable study of medical treatments especially difficult. Science and common sense interconnect, scientific knowledge informs common sense. Although, the two can be seen as having distinctive characteristics.

  1. "Judgements about dialects are often essentially judgements about the speakers of those dialects. Discuss."

    the traits of respective dialects, though these views are based not on linguistic merit - rather its emulation of the 'received' or 'standardised' variety of the language (the most revered British dialect utilised by various official establishments such as Government and the BBC).

  2. Philosophies of Social Science.

    to show much more interest in holism. For this reason, Paul Cormack will focus on individualism and Rob Furbey on holism. There are difficult issues of sequencing here. Which came first - individualism or holism? The words 'chicken' and 'egg' come to mind!

  1. To what extent and why would you agree or disagree with the view that ...

    Naturally, the New Right reject this view of humans, again this can be rooted back to the importance of the individual and their assumption that humankind will very rarely act for the collective good. However, this argument ignores the cyclical nature of human relationships, any moral or collective consciousness is

  2. "Absolutism can never be acceptable in a modern society" Discuss.

    The more we question these ideas the more diversity in opinions there is created in a society - this is where you see the principles of relativism appearing. Therefore the further and further away a society goes from absolutism. God starts to become irrelevant - 'who is this God' -

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work