• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Perhaps the biggest cause of problems in the modern world is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Discuss this assertion.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Science, Technology & Society ESSAY TITLE: Perhaps the biggest cause of problems in the modern world is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Discuss this assertion. Since the beginning of human life, science and technology was, is and will be side by side with man and mankind. Even from the simplest discoveries that helped mankind, anyone could see that mankind depends so much on science and technology that these days are almost impossible to know a fold of life that has nothing to do with them. However in this relationship, as in all relationships and kinds of them, there are some advantages and disadvantages. One major disadvantage is the failure of society to keep pace with, and control of, science and technology. Mankind has been evolved so much that people do not know what to expect next. What will be the next great discovery or innovation of science and technology that will amaze us? However all these discoveries and innovations have a price which grows bigger day by day. The price is the constant remotion of the ordinary people from all these technologies, which is used by an 'elite' which can understand the functions of technology or they have the knowledge to use all these technologies. ...read more.

Middle

But political choices fail down to unravel how a larger political interest can be of any help to the implementation of scientific method. Science sometimes feels repressed because it cannot serve its own needs for knowledge and research. As a direct result science cannot fulfil its own needs and goals. For example political interests specify the whole production and where to use this production and for what reasons. Technology has just to cope with it and manage to carry out the instructions of the political realm. So science cannot keep pace with society because society represses it and furthermore they have different goals. Politics make riddle the political morphology, as they want to be in control and ready to preclude the changes that will happen. This kind of politics has as a result the less allowance for the catastrophic implications of the technology in various folds of human life. As a conclusion, politics and society count on technology and especially in their capability to manage the development of technology, for their survival. Politics interfere straightforward in the funding, organisation and priorities of science and technology, as the scientific knowledge is linked to the values and judgements of the politics. ...read more.

Conclusion

To sum up all of the above, science and technology is an inevitable part of the society and society is an evitable part of science and technology. They co-exist and confront each other, because they want something from each other. There is an exchange of resources and operations. However they both are necessary parts of their proper function. For example society may demand useful things that science cannot provide or can but they have no proper use in society's needs. On the other hand, science and technology can provide society rather useful innovations with applications at many aspects of life. Although both of them have different goals and demands from each other, the key for their successful co-existence is somewhere in the middle. So science and technology have to provide society with something useful and practical, under their field of research, and society has to stop to demand the results of the scientific research in a very limited time, because science has to be sure before giving something new to the society. In conclusion, society cannot keep pace with science and technology because of many different reasons. Each one of these reasons contributes to the alienation of society and science and technology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Sociology is not, cannot be, and should not be a science.

    can be made to perhaps gain an understanding further based on the 'truth'. The majority of science, excluding para-scientific research and knowledge, is objective and where one scientist can measure a variable, such as the boiling point of dimethyltryptamine, another scientist can do the same and attain the same measure.

  2. "Absolutism can never be acceptable in a modern society" Discuss.

    Jesus said 'Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone'. This could be considered as the birth of relativism - to put situations/people - in relation to our own failings; to look beyond the law that says this is right and this is wrong and apply the law with compassion and forgiveness, as Jesus did.

  1. How and why is surveillance used in cities? To what extent is surveillance a ...

    similar type of surveillance that has increased over the last 20 years, would be the introduction of private security firms. Private security firms are common use today within shops, pubs and clubs, car parks and even in residential buildings. A good example of private security firms being used would be

  2. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    Recruitment: Advantage or Ability? As well as assessing how representative these elites are of the social structure, it is also important to study the typical 'avenues' taken to attain elite positions (such as the educational or occupational pathway), including those taken by members of the most privileged class into a relatively 'closed' elite (Giddens 1972 p349).

  1. Philosophies of Social Science.

    Paul will explore individualism in more detail next week. These notes will move on to focus on the reactions of many sociologists against an emerging world in which individualism was a prevailing doctrine, not least in economic thought and practice. These criticisms of individualism involved major developments of holistic social perspectives.1 In the end, the intention is to enable

  2. The development of Spartan society.

    are poor, they were easily and successfully bribed.'13 Perhaps, Xenophon best succinctly summarizes the role of the king within Spartan society, he is a 'priest in the divine sphere and a general in the human one.'14 Spartan political structure is further reflected here as the kings lack their conventional 'complete' power.

  1. "Judgements about dialects are often essentially judgements about the speakers of those dialects. Discuss."

    Therefore, one could discern that, if dialectal content necessitates the input of social background, judgments of dialects could be verified as the respective social traits of the speaker are evident in what they say and how it is said. In Britain, "people are often able to make instant and unconscious

  2. Scholarly detachment in scientific research.

    This shows us how yes knowledge will teach us how to do the math or learn the history dates but our own influences, needs, opinions will make our own decisions as to what we want to learn about. This could also be related back to a general teaching classroom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work