• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prostitution: Prohibit or Legalize? Both Sides of the Debate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Prostitution: Prohibit or Legalize? Both Sides of the Debate Introduction The debate over prostitution is one that divides feminists into two groups: the Radical Feminists who want prostitution abolished, and the Liberal Feminists who would like to see prostitution decriminalized, and normalized in our society. Scott Anderson (2002) describes in his essay the strong and weak points of both the radical feminists' and the liberals' arguments, with the most positive emphasis on the radical feminists position for abolishing the institution. Nick Larson's account of prostitution (2001) is much more objective than Anderson's, but he points out that decriminalizing prostitution, and transforming it into a "viable service-related occupation" (2001:62), would have many health and safety benefits for the prostitute. Both Larson and Dr. Maggie O'Neill (1996) would like to see brothel-keeping laws removed, so that women can work in environments with health and safety standards, and also for the protection that would come with operating in small groups of women with mutual interests. Yvonne Abraham with Sarah McNaught (1997) bring up valid points on either side of the debate, directly from such radical feminists as lawyer Catherine MacKinnon and anti-pornography theorist and ex-prostitute Andrea Dworkin, (who also has a quote in Anderson's essay (2002), describing the horror ...read more.

Middle

as "a kind of inhuman violence targeted at the female body," the social stigma attached to prostitutes and pimps. The fact that women earn lower wages than men, and that there are fewer employment options available to them is a factor that Davis (1979) approaches. He suggests that if the wages of working girls were raised, there would be less incentive for women to go into prostitution rather than the more socially accepted forms of employment. There would, therefore, be fewer prostitutes on the street, and the ones still there would be in higher demand, and would then be charging more for their services. The larger amounts of money being made by prostitutes would then entice even women who have legitimate occupations into the field of prostitution, and there would be as many prostitutes as there were to begin with. Social conditions that force women into the trade, and seem to undermine their ability to avoid the harms and abuses that accompany this sort of work also fall into this category. Many girls go into prostitution because of prior physical or sexual harassment and brutality, or because of homelessness, substance addiction, or financial emergency. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, where prostitution is decriminalized, police officers and prostitutes are on the same side. Prostitutes speak at police academies, and the communication pays off in safer working conditions (Abraham with McNaught, 1997). Conclusion In conclusion, the radical feminists want to completely get rid of prostitution in any form, because of its sexist, chauvinistic patriarchal nature, and because it is harmful and degrading to women. The liberal feminists want to make life better for the prostitute by allowing them to continue to work in the sex trade, with the law on their side, to protect them and make their working conditions as safe and healthy as any other worker in our society. Anderson (2002) has the fullest, most complete argument, presenting both sides equally, and giving substantial reasons for his siding with the radical feminists to abolish the sex trade, because to normalize it would be to give up sexual autonomy. Abraham with McNaught (1997) also have very convincing arguments for both sides of the debate, quotes directly from extreme radical feminists, and those from the other end of the spectrum as well. Davis (1979) also has good arguments, that are very objective. They are good material to read to begin forming a personal opinion on the debate. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Assess the nature-nurture debate in relation to genders

    The basis of division of labour is clearly laid down in childhood. Women are expected to be physically weaker, emotional and have motherly instincts and not to have strong sexual drives. Whereas men are stronger, less emotional more aggressive as I mentioned earlier and have powerful sexual drives.

  2. The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate

    Milton Friedman is an outspoken critic of CSR. In a New York Times article [Friedman, 1970] he states CSR advocates are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism" [p.1]. Friedman claims only people, not organisations, can have social responsibilities, and as such, should accomplish philanthropic activity with their own time and money,

  1. The cannabis debate

    (Runciman, 1999) The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 classifies drugs based on the harm they cause: > Class A (the most harmful) includes morphine and diamorphine (heroin). > Class B (an intermediate category) includes amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and cannabis resin.

  2. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    All participants were willing to talk in depth regarding their experience of domestic violence. Using both orientated and open-ended questions, the interviews were typically conducted by female researchers who unintentially, during the process of the study, became affiliated with the participants - this had the added advantage of producing both

  1. 'There are liberal feminists, socialist feminists and radical feminists, but no conservative feminists.' Discuss.

    Also, by advocating a 'personhood', liberal feminists may be making it harder for women to act collectively. This is why radical feminists advocate a 'sisterhood' of all women. Socialist feminism only became prominent in the second half of the twentieth century.

  2. How Do You Account For the Fact That the Regulation of Prostitution Has Usually ...

    The prostitute, however, had become an object of fascination and horror by the moral public. By the 1850's prostitution became the 'Great Social Evil.' They were seen to be without morals and were a threat. At a time where female sexuality was constructed as passive and being subservient to male desire, prostitutes posed a serious challenge to the notion.

  1. Sexism is a form of prejudice.

    when he is soba she is nothing but a skivvy to him. The Café is a sexist place. The people who work there are all women, no men. It's a man that owns it; he would rather see women slaving over the cooker.

  2. Legalisation of Prostitution.

    Many have their reasoning impaired by an unhappy family background or previous sexual abuse. They may be compelled to enter prostitution by circumstances beyond their control, such as drug addiction or the necessity to provide for a family. If such a profession is in fact legalized it will only prove

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work