• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prostitution: Prohibit or Legalize? Both Sides of the Debate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Prostitution: Prohibit or Legalize? Both Sides of the Debate Introduction The debate over prostitution is one that divides feminists into two groups: the Radical Feminists who want prostitution abolished, and the Liberal Feminists who would like to see prostitution decriminalized, and normalized in our society. Scott Anderson (2002) describes in his essay the strong and weak points of both the radical feminists' and the liberals' arguments, with the most positive emphasis on the radical feminists position for abolishing the institution. Nick Larson's account of prostitution (2001) is much more objective than Anderson's, but he points out that decriminalizing prostitution, and transforming it into a "viable service-related occupation" (2001:62), would have many health and safety benefits for the prostitute. Both Larson and Dr. Maggie O'Neill (1996) would like to see brothel-keeping laws removed, so that women can work in environments with health and safety standards, and also for the protection that would come with operating in small groups of women with mutual interests. Yvonne Abraham with Sarah McNaught (1997) bring up valid points on either side of the debate, directly from such radical feminists as lawyer Catherine MacKinnon and anti-pornography theorist and ex-prostitute Andrea Dworkin, (who also has a quote in Anderson's essay (2002), describing the horror ...read more.

Middle

as "a kind of inhuman violence targeted at the female body," the social stigma attached to prostitutes and pimps. The fact that women earn lower wages than men, and that there are fewer employment options available to them is a factor that Davis (1979) approaches. He suggests that if the wages of working girls were raised, there would be less incentive for women to go into prostitution rather than the more socially accepted forms of employment. There would, therefore, be fewer prostitutes on the street, and the ones still there would be in higher demand, and would then be charging more for their services. The larger amounts of money being made by prostitutes would then entice even women who have legitimate occupations into the field of prostitution, and there would be as many prostitutes as there were to begin with. Social conditions that force women into the trade, and seem to undermine their ability to avoid the harms and abuses that accompany this sort of work also fall into this category. Many girls go into prostitution because of prior physical or sexual harassment and brutality, or because of homelessness, substance addiction, or financial emergency. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, where prostitution is decriminalized, police officers and prostitutes are on the same side. Prostitutes speak at police academies, and the communication pays off in safer working conditions (Abraham with McNaught, 1997). Conclusion In conclusion, the radical feminists want to completely get rid of prostitution in any form, because of its sexist, chauvinistic patriarchal nature, and because it is harmful and degrading to women. The liberal feminists want to make life better for the prostitute by allowing them to continue to work in the sex trade, with the law on their side, to protect them and make their working conditions as safe and healthy as any other worker in our society. Anderson (2002) has the fullest, most complete argument, presenting both sides equally, and giving substantial reasons for his siding with the radical feminists to abolish the sex trade, because to normalize it would be to give up sexual autonomy. Abraham with McNaught (1997) also have very convincing arguments for both sides of the debate, quotes directly from extreme radical feminists, and those from the other end of the spectrum as well. Davis (1979) also has good arguments, that are very objective. They are good material to read to begin forming a personal opinion on the debate. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate

    and not by drawing resources from their enterprise or from the shareholder's pocket [Friedman, 1970]. David Henderson and Roger Kerr [Henderson, 2001; Kerr, 2004], members of the NZ Business Round Table, believe the responsibility of organisations is to produce goods and services for consumers.

  2. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    (Roberts, 1981, page 46) Participants for the study were selected from a London hospital, in which Oakley had spent 6 months observing women who were experiencing the process of becoming a mother. Oakley's method was to informally interview 66 'first time' mothers-to-be, who were all booked to give birth in the same hospital and all from the same cultural background.

  1. 'There are liberal feminists, socialist feminists and radical feminists, but no conservative feminists.' Discuss.

    Millet believed that patriarchy was present not only in the family but also in literature, art and public life, and should be challenged through 'consciousness raising': through discussion and education, women would become aware of the sexism that pervades their society and would be better equipped to challenge it.

  2. Assess the nature-nurture debate in relation to genders

    It carries the code which influences future development' Weeks.J (1985) Sociobiologists also argue that genes exist for every social phenomenon so that the random survival of the genes could explain all social practices from economic efficiency and educational attainment to gender divisions.

  1. The cannabis debate

    (Runciman, 1999) The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 classifies drugs based on the harm they cause: > Class A (the most harmful) includes morphine and diamorphine (heroin). > Class B (an intermediate category) includes amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and cannabis resin.

  2. Sexism is a form of prejudice.

    I am now going to discuss TV; the first area in TV is soap operas. There is a lot of sexism in soap operas, for example, someone not getting a job because of their sex, or a boy wanting to go out with a girl so he can sleep with her.

  1. Who won their debate - Miliband or Poulantzas?

    The essay will hence start by trying to define methodological individualism and methodological collectivism. Individualism is an approach to ethics, social science and political and social philosophy which emphasises the importance of human individuals in contrast to the social wholes, such as families, classes or societies, to which they belong.

  2. Homophobia: a Definition

    For the word to apply, the homophobe need not be filled with active hatred and fanatical bigotry or a desire to actively do harm to homosexuals. Although such cases exist, homophobia may also involve milder levels of emotion--distrust, passive dislike, with no more antipathy than the assertion that homosexuals should remain socially anonymous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work