• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Religion may encourage rather than inhibit Social Change," Critically discuss this statement with reference to contemporary society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Religion may encourage rather than inhibit Social Change," Critically discuss this statement with reference to contemporary society. Religion as a force of social change is not an idea that is generally accepted by traditional Marxists, they generally favour the idea that religion keeps society stationary. The main sociologist that argues that religion is a force of social change is Weber, he sees it as away of promoting change. However the relationship between religion and social change is complex, in some cases religion promotes social change and in others it hinders it. Functionalists and Feminists support the Marxist belief that religion is a conservative force. These perspectives believe that it is the changes in society that shape religion and not the other way round. Marxists believe that religion acts as a conservative force by maintaining a status quo for the benefit of the ruling class. The working class are kept in their place, and the pain caused by oppression and exploitation is eased. Functionalists believe that religion promotes integration and social solidarity, norms and values are promoted that help individuals cope in times of stress. Feminists also believe in religion being a conservative force, maintaining patriarchy. Not only does religion maintain the status quo, but it also encourages traditional beliefs and customs. ...read more.

Middle

He spans both structuralist and interpretive perspectives. Weber believed that social inquiry must begin with the individual, and attempt to understand the motives and ideas, which influence behaviour. Weber argued that ideas and beliefs can have important consequences for the way people think and act, only by understanding the meaning given to situations can we understand social action. In Weber's work "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" he pointed out that religion itself could be a source of major social change through the intervention of significant ideas or people. Weber looked at Calvinists, which he believed has key teachings and values that encouraged capitalism. Calvinists believed in predestination, an idea that people were already allocated places in heaven in advance. Calvinists would look for "signs" that they were among those chosen for salvation and reduce fear they may not be saved. These "signs" included working hard, material success gained through work and living a sober life. Weber believed that the idea of predestination lead to the rise of capitalism by making it possible for people to accumulate wealth and reinvest it, seeing poverty as a moral degradation so people were under moral obligation to look after the poor and because people did not enjoy their wealth by spending, instead reinvesting it to make more money. ...read more.

Conclusion

However Sects attract less privileged groups who have less to loose from social change. The presence of alternative non-religious avenues for change can promote change through religion. If change cannot be achieved through non-secular methods, perhaps a religious alternative might result. E.g. E. P. Thompson said on the role of Methodists, 1790-1850, that before this period the working class had a great hope of political change and only turned to Methodism when these hopes achieved very little. Finally, those in a powerful position in religious institutions have more of an impact of influencing social change. However, this can restrain parts of an organisation, e.g. the Pope clashed with Latin American Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests over Liberation Theology. In conclusion, according to Marxists and other perspectives coming from a structural perspective, religion does not promote, rather keeping society stable and encouraging the social structure. Weber and Nelson see religion as a promoting social change and undermining stability. They believe that religion can act as a catalyst for social change. However, religion can both encourage and inhibit social change, but it depends on the circumstances and of course the role of religion in society and how influential it is. Many may argue that religion is not as influential in today's society as it once was due to society becoming more secular, therefore is neither a force of social control, nor change. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Evaluate the view that religion acts as a Conservative force in Modern society

    However more recently religion has been accused of acting as an agent of social control over women. The term "agent of social control" literally means a tool utilised by an agency which diverts power away from a group and maintains the stratification of power and order of an institution or structure.

  2. Is religion a force for social change?

    Therefore, says Marx, religion is not a promoter of social change, as it reduces an individual's hostility to wards an unequal and exploitative society. The functionalist, Durkheim, would agree with Marx to a certain extent, that is, he believes that religion "reaffirms the conscience collective", although Durkheim sees this as

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Communities of villages, members of the sib, the guild or of partners in seafaring, hunting and warring expeditions have known two elemental principles: first, the dualism or in-group and out-group morality. For in-group morality the principled obligation to give brotherly support in distress has existed.

  2. What Civil Society Can Do to Develop Democracy

    This requires a broad coalition of organizations, unconnected to political parties or candidates, that deploys neutral monitors at all the different polling stations to ensure that the voting and vote counting is entirely free, fair, peaceful, and transparent. It is very hard to have credible and fair elections in a new democracy unless civil society groups play this role.

  1. The ancient civilizations of Central and South America

    4 The Inca's believed in an afterlife, and treated the people who died almost as well as they treated the huaca. If the royal emperor or king died, he was still attended to as if he were still alive. Servants would be present and would attend to his many daily problems, even though he was dead.

  2. 'Religion may encourage rather than inhibit social change'.

    For example recently in Latin America, Catholic priests demonstrated how the bourgeoisies used religion to justify inequality, and criticised them and therefore acted against all their interest. This example shows that when oppressed groups are willing to put an end to their grievance, the church can help to revolutionise their situation by criticising the rich and powerful and demanding changes.

  1. Pitted against Patriarchy

    The marginalization of Judith Hearne is typical of the ways in which certain identities lie outside an ideal community. When she fails to live up to the community's expectations, Moore exposes the ways in which the community attempts to silence her and contain the disruption she causes.

  2. Which sections of society were most drawn to support the Protestant Reformation and ...

    They may have seen the new order as a way to attain more freedom to practice their vocation without interference from above. The urban clergy, who tended to be more highly educated, showed more enthusiasm than the rural clergy. An enquiry conducted in Ulm in 1531 showed that only a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work