• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of British society, but did it exist before within the extended family

Extracts from this document...


Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of British society, but did it exist before within the extended family? The pre- industrial family was said to be an extended family consisting of three generations, the children, parents and the grandparents. The family would all work together in the farms to help provide for the entire families needs, children as young a 5 or 6 would have been found work to do. However this was until the Industrial revolution when factories become the main source of work and development. The pre-industrial societies were largely based on extended kinship networks; land and other resources were commonly owned by a range of relatives that extended well beyond the unit of the nuclear family. It was very common for families to work alongside their cousins and even live with them. This extended family was responsible for the production of the shelter, food and clothing for the family. Roles in the family were usually ascribed to the offspring rather than being achieved. These roles would hardly ever be rejected and in return for this commitment, the extended network would perform other functions for the members. The family gave its members the skills and the education in which to take their place in the family division of labour. ...read more.


However is this actually true? Laslett seems to suggest that the nuclear family has always existed but worked as an extended family and that industrialisation only occurred because of the nuclear family and not the other way around. So if Laslett is correct then there was no extended family but two nuclear families working as an extended unit, living under separate roofs. This greatly flaws Parsons and Young and Wilmot's theories of the extended family consisting of three generations. So has the nuclear family always been the norm of British society and has everything that has been developed has only been developed because of it? 'Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family' The Industrial Revolution was from 1750's - 1850's, which had four main effects. One was the Economic system becoming industrial from agriculture, the second was Mechanisation meaning production in factories becoming more efficient, the third was Urbanisation and the fourth was population explosion - low mobility rate and higher birth rate. Tallcott Parsons (1950's) believed that the extended family in pre Industrial Britain was the most beneficial as they were a unit of production and they were able to maintain a subsistence level of existence with very little reliance on non-family members. Parsons believed that post industrialisation, the nuclear family became the new dominant family structure for reasons such as geographical mobility. ...read more.


He applies the concept of 'role bargaining' to his study of the family meaning individuals attempt to obtain the best possible bargain in their relationships with others, which affects the family structure as they will maintain relationships with kin and submit to their control if they feel they are getting a good return on their investment of tome, energy and emotion. David cheal criticises Goode's theories as being closely related to the modernist view of progress. He particularly attacks Parsons saying faith in progress expressed by writers like parsons ignored contradictions within modernity. From a Marxist perspective the nuclear family benefited capitalism as it can be used as an ideological apparatus to promote the capitalist values rather than benefiting the whole of society, this is because consumer advertising is directed at the nuclear family nuclear for example adverts for cereals, it encourages them to pursue capitalist goals by stressing the importance of materialism. Although Radical feminists believe the nuclear family benefits the needs of men rather than all of society. This is because radicals believe that men and women are socialised into a set of ideas that largely confirms male power and superiority, it transmits patriarchal ideology encouraging the nation that the sexual division of labour is natural. It would appear that we are moving more into a nuclear family structure but it is unlikely for the movement to be as fast as Parsons suggests ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Is the Nuclear Family universal?

    4 star(s)

    Kibbutz children will grow up with the same social and cultural influences as that of a normal family even though it would be considered that the community is raising them. Murdock's main functions of a nuclear family can be applied to that of the Nayar, the Lakker and the Kibbutz

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    number of the population to be surveyed, this means that a generalisation cannot be made accurately. Also, another disadvantage of an interview is the fact that the interviewer can never be sure of whether or not the respondent is answering honestly, saying what he or she truly believes or the way they really do behave in society.

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    residing in it, which is the result of divorce, remarriage and chid birth outside of marriage. A cause for the new family model, according to Talcott Parson, (3) is because the family has "adapted to fulfil more specialised functions". By specialised functions, I believe he means the changing society, such

  2. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    (Andrew Ure (1835, The Blessings of the Factory System) The Philosophy of Manufacturers) In his writing Andrew Ure is writing from a very narrow viewpoint. He fails to state the hours the worker was at the machine for and that the worker had become unskilled, they had to keep pace with the machine also that the worker had no

  1. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    slower than that at which women are learning to do male tasks like plastering etc. This source is relevant to my study because selected tasks between husband and wife remain much the same, women doing more housework and men doing painting etc.

  2. "How important are kinship ties in industrial societies." Discuss.

    This being state d as these systems require a great deal of geographic mobility from its labour force. Such mobility would have been a difficulty if the family had any relations to their kin. Some of Parson's counterparts such as Sussman and Burchinal tend to believe that one should spurn Parson's concept of the isolated nuclear family.

  1. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    "The Political culture of the elite, therefore, allowed wide debate about the substance of policy but imposed great procedural restraints: government had to be carried on confidentially; the supremacy of Parliament could not be challenged; political debate had to b conducted in a ceremonial and ritualistic way governed by a 'gentlemanly' code."

  2. Why is there unequal division of household labour in most of the society?

    patriarchy that is "a system of values that asserts and maintains man's dominant position in society" (Morris, 1990:83). Abbott and Wallace also proposed that it is men's control over financial resources that gives them power in marriage and makes it difficult for a wife to be independent from her husband.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work