• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Social and action theories

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast Social Action Theories and Structural Theories. Sociological perspectives on society are divided into two areas; Structural and Action Theories. Both these theories aim to describe how society is structured, and what contributes to that make up. This document will look at the theories on which both structural and action perspectives are based. One aspect of society will be used as an example to show how each theory can have differing views on the same subject. The structural theory looks at society as a whole. This is called a macro theory as it takes an overall view of society. The basis of this theory is how the structure of society impacts on human behaviour. There are two approaches to the structural theory these are Functionalist and Marxist. Action theories in contrast to structural theories look at society from a micro perspective as it looks at the individual. Their perspective is that individual choices shape society. Structural Perspective The social structure is the framework around which any society is based. Both Functionalists and Marxists are Structuralists as they are both interested in the institutions that combine to make up the fabric of society for example the family, education, religion etc. ...read more.

Middle

Whereas in contrast the Functionalist would say that the working class have the same opportunities as everybody else and they can make of life what they want. * Interactionists would question the over concentration on economic relationships at the expense of social relationships such as family and friendship. They would argue that Marxists ignore the 'actors' choices in society. * Functionalism emphasises shared values and harmony whereas the conflict view of society sees it as divided into groups or classes whose interests conflict with each other. * The Marxist view ignores the subjective interpretations of class for example a persons subjective interpretation of their class might be quite different to their objective class position. * One of the strongest criticisms of Marx's work is that he predicted a revolution and as yet this has not occurred. He seemed to underestimate the flexibility of capitalism for example the Bourgeoisie can make concessions to the Proletariat by offering better wages and working conditions without relinquishing their power. Social Action Perspective These theories concentrate on relatively small scale levels of social interaction and are referred to as micro theories. It focuses on how individuals interact with one another in society. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are similarities between the Interactionist perspective and the Marxist as they both see laws as something that the people in power have put in place. Both would argue that some laws are only clear to the people who make them, not to the people who commit crime. By looking at all perspectives it's easy to see the problems they have in explaining crime. It can be concluded that both structural and action perspectives have advantages and disadvantages. The sociological perspectives complement each other in the sense that each explains some aspect of our behaviour convincingly. Interactionism could contribute to our understanding of society by taking the studies of individuals and combining with the Functionalist and Marxist theories to establish the relationship between the individual and the organised structure of rules, external to the individual. Structuralism does not explain how and why social change occurs. Instead of recognising the roles of individuals shaping their own destiny, they just regard them as part of the pre-determined social structure. The action theorists are humanists and are critical of this structuralist 'puppet theory', they recognise the impact individuals have on society but that society cannot function without humankind. Both theories are valuable studies as they form the basis of further sociological studies. Without them, the new contemporary studies such as Keat and Urry (1975) and Moore (1988) may never have been initiated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Different Sociological Perspectives on Crime

    the affluent teenager, whose music and dress sense became linked with deviant or at least values disapproved of by the public. Cohen says "the response was as much to what they stood for s what they did" about the Mods and Rockers.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    As an individual, we must learn how to interact and co-operate with others who are not related to us and not part of a group of our chosen friends. Because the child must obey school rules and interact with other members of the school community, school gives children a context

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    that of the dominant hosts, minimising cultural differences between the two, with the intention of becoming accepted and gaining mobility within that particular society. This process is known assimilation. (Pilkington, 1984) For this study, Paterson used both observation and participant observation and conducted interviews with 250 'white' and 150 Afro-Caribbean participants.

  2. Using examples describe a range of sociological perspectives and theories (including both classic and ...

    each have their own view points so naturally will all have their own weaknesses, which is what I'm going to look at now. Marxists only seem to look at the employment system, which excludes the jobless from this society. They are not really being exploited in exchange for wages because

  1. Critically evaluate the various sociological theories of crime and deviance including: Functionalist, Marxist, Labelling ...

    Before Durkhiem, most sociologists believed that crime was created by a small number of 'sick and unnatural' individuals. He introduced the idea that criminals are an integral part of society and have a role to play in it. A criticism of his work is that he does not offer any

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    So therefore their values are not represented by the state. They only represent the needs of the rich. The state benefit system was put into place to literally keep people in their place. Keep mums in homes making more "factory fodder"; make sure they are healthy enough to go to work.

  1. Gender Socialisation

    Although more gender roles are being challenged in the 21st century, it will be a long time before all societies can be challenged for a better and equal role for both genders, wherever there is poverty or no education traditional gender roles will be reinforced.

  2. The differences and similarities between functionism, marxism, and social action theory.

    the political, legal and educational systems or superstructure. Marx claimed that the infrastructure largely shapes the superstructure. As opposed to functionalism, Marxism believes conflict is the character of society and that social order is imposed by the rich and powerful and not on the basis of society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work