• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Societies have evolved a variety of structures for settling disputes. Select two contrasting examples- one from the textbook, to illustrate their methods and examine the success of arbitration in any one society.

Extracts from this document...


Societies have evolved a variety of structures for settling disputes. Select two contrasting examples- one from the textbook, to illustrate their methods and examine the success of arbitration in any one society. Settling disputes is a major part of politics and social control, which are vital for the harmonious function of any society. Different societies achieve this in different ways. In western state society formal offices are held and people given authority to judge and implement punishment or resolution. At the other end of the spectrum are the egalitarian societies, where authority is non-existent, no-one has any power to make anybody do anything, and inequality is very actively discouraged. There are a vast array of structures that come between the two extremes for example those that have a mixture of formal offices and informal methods. This essay examines first the structured court system of western state society, and then the less structured but still formal method of dispute settlement used by the Zapotec people of the Ralu'a village (or pueblo) in South America. This comparison shows that even though there are formal institutions in place in both societies, which may initially seem a poor comparison, however the objective with which they are used varies greatly and they are used to very different effect. ...read more.


Deviance is punished regardless of its impact on society, instilling a code of conduct and the power of authority, which can work as a preventative measure. Punishments such as incarceration and fines may instil bitterness and a desire for revenge. The dispute is not really settled; more that blame has been officially placed and the plaintiff compensated. In comparison are the Zapotec Indians of Ralu'a village in South America studied by Laura Nader (Spradley & McCurdey, 2003). The Zapotec have a number of levels for settling disputes. They have a mediation court system, but a number of more informal methods that are encouraged before court is reached. There are a number of implicit procedural laws, but settlements are usually made on a case-by -case basis with no formalised codifying. Their basic legal principle is "to make the balance". Our western legal systems focus primarily on placing blame, finding fault, and a relevant punishment for going against the culture's legal principle. The Zapotec are more concerned with maintaining the balance, finding a peaceful resolution, and the future relationships involved. Their aim is not to punish potential threats to the control of the state government but to maintain a harmonious, cohesive community. ...read more.


Cohesion is not nearly as vital to everyday life here as it is in smaller communities- disputes are resolved in a very individual way, which is impractical for larger populations- we could not consider intricately every detail of why someone may have hit someone else- we have to have definite boundaries. Hitting is thought of as wrong and not desirable for a peaceful community, thus the fact it is against the law simply prohibits violence regardless of the reason. This is a simple black and white law, and has consequences of which everyone is aware. The depersonalised system is consistent with the impersonal nature of our society. To conclude there are clear differences in the way each society tackles dispute settlement. There is the authoritative Western system that seeks prevention through a vast number of procedural and substantive laws with the primary aim of ensuring 'justice' and punishment. Then there is the more informal system of the Zapotec Indians, who regard restoring the balance and future relationships as more important than placing the blame. I cannot see either system working in the other's community due to the vast cultural differences, and differences in population size, however they seem to prove effective for each individual society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Young, male + black = gang member possibly carrying a weapon/drugs He argues that whether a person is arrested or not depends on "negotiation" - If the suspect gives the police respect, they will be treated better + may be let off with a warning.

  2. Does Boxing have a future?

    Boxing like contact sports share the fact that it has specific sets of rules. Contact as well as injury, which are within the rules, are deemed consensual. However, the biting of an opponents ear for example, a la Mike Tyson is not within the rules is assault, as it was not consented.

  1. Invisible Man: A Universally Applicable Tale of One Man's Journey of Self-Discovery.

    His physical invisibility as well as his deeper psychological attitude of being invisible helped him several times throughout the course of the novel. Because he realizes his fate as Invisible Man is inevitable, he embraces this identity and learns how to benefit from his position in society.

  2. evaluation of methods

    Conclusion AIM 1 My first aim was to do a survey to find about either younger Indians and elder Indians prefer arranged or love marriage. I found out that 70% of the population of 20 from the previous generation had an arranged marriage, but only 10% wants to get an arranged marriage from this generation.

  1. The ancient civilizations of Central and South America

    � The Aztecs believed that human sacrifices were a very important part of their religion, and were an excellent way to keep their demanding gods happy. They believed that these sacrifices maintained the cycle of life that was the Aztec empire, and prevented their world's destruction.

  2. Critically Examine the Subcultural Approach to Crime and Deviance.

    Where these values, in particular, differ from those of the wider culture within which the sub-culture exists, they may not necessarily be in opposition to such values. However, what such sub-cultural values represent is an "independent" product of - and solution to - the problems faced by people in their everyday lives.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Some range argue that death penalty may even have a brutalising effect upon society, Well since the abolition of the death penalty in 1981 in Britain, there was quite a rise in serious crime which isn't good obviously, The rates for unlawful killings in Britain have more than doubled since

  2. Notes on Violence in Society

    Parent abuse 1. Parents have a position of power and authority in a family and, within certain limits, it is assumed that they will decide how that power is used. 2. Adolescents were reported to have kicked, punched, beaten up, or used a gun or knife against a parent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work