• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory

Extracts from this document...


The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory were both highly influential in their definition of and approach to dealing with crime and criminal punishment. For centuries scholars and theorists have attempted to adopt a new and effective approach to criminal punishment, in the hope that one can understand and thus know how to deal with criminal behaviour in an effective manner. Yet, while the two theories are rather different, they also contain similarities, and both influence the criminal systems of even today around the world. In an attempt to compare and evaluate the two, a brief explanation is necessary, in order to understand exactly how they differ and combine on certain elements. The classical approach to criminal behaviour was the first to move away from the concept of classifying crime as a sin. It thus brought the shift from unfettered power to punish criminal behaviour on a spiritual level to a reason-based approach, with checks on authority. In contrast, the positivist approach adopts a statistical based approach, under which societal factors are assessed to determine which characteristics are more likely to cause crime. At once, one can see the fundamentally different bases upon which each theory is propped. ...read more.


And one can thus see how the former sought to focus on removing the causes of crime whereas the latter sought ways to punish criminals effectively yet fairly. Yet this is not to say that the classical approach does not seek to prevent or reduce crime. Indeed, punishment was seen as a deterrent; it merely proposed that the intensity of punishment was not necessarily a calculus of the intensity of deterrent effects. Thus, theorists such as Bentham proposed that punishment should outweigh the pleasure deduced from crime, but still on a minimal level; only that which is enough to deter others. Furthermore, concepts such as the speed with which punishment is administered and the publicity of it is seen as more productive of deterrence as the severity. The differences between the two theories are somewhat reminiscent of the eras in which they emerged. The classical theory occurred at a period of religious dominance, where corporal punishment was widely adopted, and the 'eye for an eye' concept allowed the torture of criminals based on the extent of their sinful behaviour. But this proved to be difficult to monitor, and punishments simply depended on the subjective opinion of the authoritative figure administering sentences. ...read more.


The positivist approach was too simplistic also, but on a different plane than that of the classical approach. Lombroso's attempt to classify criminal behaviour into four categories was helpful, but seemed too simplistic and rounded to lead to anything revolutionary. Where the classical approach was arguably too philosophical, the positivist approach appeared to anthropological, thus overlooking factors such as the social contract and concepts of utilitarianism to understand how to administer punishment on a more effective level. Having compared these two approaches to criminology, one can begin to understand their fundamental differences, yet also their similarities. Of course, one has only scratched the surface on these rather complex theories and the concepts they encapsulate, but the overall basis of their approaches is accurate, and appropriately profound enough to understand. Here we have two seemingly entirely different approaches, with some similarities and basic concepts. It is easy to understand how they differ, yet difficult to envisage why they failed to be slightly more realistic in their propositions and promises. However, only through these errors can one formulate different aspects of various theories and understand the different problems that emerged in the field of criminology throughout the decades. 1 P89, first book. 2 First book, p92 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Conformity = Accepting the definition Colonisation = Accepting the def while you are there Institutionalisation = Becoming so dependant an institution that is impossible to cope in normal outside society. Weber + SAT Structuralists argue they can explain human behaviour e.g.

  2. Evaluation of the difference between Positivist and Interpretivist methodologies

    This can be seen in Weber's research into the relationship between the Protestant work ethic and Capitalism.[17] People having no choice in how they behave because external objective forces cause their behaviour, seems to be the mainstay of the positivist theory, such as when Emile Durkheim tried to prove a

  1. Inventing Reality: Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    Since the outer reality does not offer him any hope, he is trying to make himself feel better by thinking that he is actually suffering by drinking alcohol. When talking to Raskolnikov, Marmeladov acknowledges that in drinking "it is not joy that [he] seeks, but sorrow only...[he] drinks, for he wishes doubly to suffer" (16).

  2. Modernity - a philosophical disposition

    Freud argues that we have an obsession in modern society with order and structure. Order and structure can lead to (1) obsessive and neurotic compulsion and (2) repression. Similarly Freud argues, that the repression of internal desires will lead to displaced aggression.

  1. What are "one-world theory"and "two-world theory"?

    These ideas form the western maxim, in which an axiom is inexistent, but is a concept realized by idea and reason. For Aristotle whose account of causes to examine the relation of form to matter is divergent from that of his teacher, Plato, change is always the actualization of some potential.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    However, it had not only a unique consistency (by virtue of being based on logical deduction, rather than religious experience) and was psychologically extraordinarily powerful. Pietism This sect sought to make the invisible Church of the elect visible on this earth.

  1. Compare the ways in which crime is presented in Moll Flanders and Roxana?Assess how ...

    If she were caught she would have faced public humiliation or possibly death- 'He had just brushed against me, but didn't notice me'. The close encounter causes tension and the word 'brush' expresses the danger of the situation. Roxana is an adulteress as; she is sexually involved with the Prince of France while still being legally married.

  2. Sociology synopsis - To what degree is torture considered cruel and unnatural?

    Therefore it is not the subject of knowledge that produces the knowledgeable person but the power knowledge relations the way in which this knowledge comes to be, through experience that determines knowledge. Pierre Bourdieu's 'Distinction' is how he thought society is stratified or more or less how it should be.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work