• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory

Extracts from this document...


The classical and positivist approaches to criminological theory were both highly influential in their definition of and approach to dealing with crime and criminal punishment. For centuries scholars and theorists have attempted to adopt a new and effective approach to criminal punishment, in the hope that one can understand and thus know how to deal with criminal behaviour in an effective manner. Yet, while the two theories are rather different, they also contain similarities, and both influence the criminal systems of even today around the world. In an attempt to compare and evaluate the two, a brief explanation is necessary, in order to understand exactly how they differ and combine on certain elements. The classical approach to criminal behaviour was the first to move away from the concept of classifying crime as a sin. It thus brought the shift from unfettered power to punish criminal behaviour on a spiritual level to a reason-based approach, with checks on authority. In contrast, the positivist approach adopts a statistical based approach, under which societal factors are assessed to determine which characteristics are more likely to cause crime. At once, one can see the fundamentally different bases upon which each theory is propped. ...read more.


And one can thus see how the former sought to focus on removing the causes of crime whereas the latter sought ways to punish criminals effectively yet fairly. Yet this is not to say that the classical approach does not seek to prevent or reduce crime. Indeed, punishment was seen as a deterrent; it merely proposed that the intensity of punishment was not necessarily a calculus of the intensity of deterrent effects. Thus, theorists such as Bentham proposed that punishment should outweigh the pleasure deduced from crime, but still on a minimal level; only that which is enough to deter others. Furthermore, concepts such as the speed with which punishment is administered and the publicity of it is seen as more productive of deterrence as the severity. The differences between the two theories are somewhat reminiscent of the eras in which they emerged. The classical theory occurred at a period of religious dominance, where corporal punishment was widely adopted, and the 'eye for an eye' concept allowed the torture of criminals based on the extent of their sinful behaviour. But this proved to be difficult to monitor, and punishments simply depended on the subjective opinion of the authoritative figure administering sentences. ...read more.


The positivist approach was too simplistic also, but on a different plane than that of the classical approach. Lombroso's attempt to classify criminal behaviour into four categories was helpful, but seemed too simplistic and rounded to lead to anything revolutionary. Where the classical approach was arguably too philosophical, the positivist approach appeared to anthropological, thus overlooking factors such as the social contract and concepts of utilitarianism to understand how to administer punishment on a more effective level. Having compared these two approaches to criminology, one can begin to understand their fundamental differences, yet also their similarities. Of course, one has only scratched the surface on these rather complex theories and the concepts they encapsulate, but the overall basis of their approaches is accurate, and appropriately profound enough to understand. Here we have two seemingly entirely different approaches, with some similarities and basic concepts. It is easy to understand how they differ, yet difficult to envisage why they failed to be slightly more realistic in their propositions and promises. However, only through these errors can one formulate different aspects of various theories and understand the different problems that emerged in the field of criminology throughout the decades. 1 P89, first book. 2 First book, p92 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Evaluation of the difference between Positivist and Interpretivist methodologies

    causal relationship within the reasons behind suicide by using the official statistics available. His findings were to be argued against by J.D. Douglas, as having taken the statistics too much at face value3. The phenomenologist, on the other hand, argues that human consciousness means "that we decide what to do

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    * There are no external causes of behaviour only the meanings + motives which people attach to their actions. * Subjective data + the meanings that actors attach to their actions = the basis of a sociological understanding. Weber vs.

  1. Inventing Reality: Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment

    belong to and consequently, are constantly seeking shelter in another type of reality: their inner world. Katerina Ivanovna is another character that is almost defeated by a reality where she had to continuously struggle with poverty and an endless series of humiliations.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Calculation is not possible without estimation in money prices and hence without market struggles. Money is the most abstract and impersonal element that exists in human life. The more the world of the capitalist economy follows its own immanent laws, the less accessible it is to any imaginable relationship with a religious ethic of brotherliness.

  1. Modernity - a philosophical disposition

    By examining Freud's theory of repression and displaced aggression in congruence to the film N!ai it will be concluded that the implementation of modernity has tragic effects. Freud thought the obsession with order and cleanliness can lead to a tyranny of order.

  2. What are "one-world theory"and "two-world theory"?

    These ideas form the western maxim, in which an axiom is inexistent, but is a concept realized by idea and reason. For Aristotle whose account of causes to examine the relation of form to matter is divergent from that of his teacher, Plato, change is always the actualization of some potential.

  1. Compare the ways in which crime is presented in Moll Flanders and Roxana?Assess how ...

    In Moll Flanders, Moll steals a lady's gold watch, Moll is almost caught but she is not suspected of taking the watch. These soap opera like episodes create intimacy between the protagonist and the reader and they have a continuing appeal to a contemporary reader, as they cause excitement, tension

  2. Sociology synopsis - To what degree is torture considered cruel and unnatural?

    What constitutes torture as being the final say or how mush torture is? Punishment is not just for a 'sentence' but indeed for its "very materiality as an instrument and vector of power; it is this whole technology of the 'soul' ..."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work